Paper · 2023 · Black Sea Journal of Agriculture

Determination of Tolerance and Sensitivity of Safflower Genotypes Based on Germination Indices and Comparison of Biochemical Contents Under Salt Stress

Sercan Önder; Nagihan Yavuz; Muhammet Tonguç

13
claims
25
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Safflower germination and seedling growth stages are extremely sensitive to salinity. The study aimed to identify safflower genotypes' germination, seedling growth responses, and biochemical changes in tolerant and susceptible genotypes in response to salt stress. Total of 28 genotypes were subjected to salt (NaCl) treatments (0, 180, 240 mM), and germination percentage, mean germination time, seedling and root lengths, and vigor index of the genotypes were determined. The genotype, treatments, and interaction effects were significant for germination, seedling, and biochemical parameters. The genotypes' germination percentage, seedling length, root length, and vigor index decreased under salt stress. While the reduction in germination percentage of salt-tolerant genotypes was between 6-21%, it was between 46-65% in sensitive genotypes at 240 mM salt treatment. Five tolerant (Shufu, Sidwill, Finch, Yuyao, Oleic Leed) and sensitive (Huaxian, Linas, 4022, Oker, Rehbein) genotypes were chosen based on reductions in germination percentage and vigor index, and the proline, hydrogen peroxide, and malondialdehyde (MDA) contents of these genotypes were investigated. The proline content of the genotypes increased by 26 to 56 fold at 180 mM salt concentration. The hydrogen peroxide content of sensitive and tolerant genotypes increased at 180 mM salt treatment, but at 240 mM salt treatment, the hydrogen peroxide content of the sensitive genotypes continued to increase by 6-50%, hydrogen peroxide content decreased in tolerant genotypes by 10-30%. MDA contents increased in the sensitive and tolerant genotypes, but the level of increase was higher in sensitive genotypes (307-631%) than the tolerant genotypes (103-323%) at 240 mM salt treatment. The heatmap generated by means of sensitive and tolerant genotypes showed 28 coefficients and 5 of which were significant. These results show that changes in hydrogen peroxide and MDA contents are different between tolerant and sensitive genotypes. They could be useful selection criteria along with germination percentages for determining tolerant and susceptible safflower genotypes at the seedling stage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotype, salt treatment and their interaction significantly affected germination, seedling and biochemical parameters.

Material
genotypee0
Outcome
germination, seedling, and biochemical parameterse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The genotype, treatments, and interaction effects were significant for germination, seedling, and biochemical parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 474–594 · show in text ↑
t0

“Safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt stress reduced germination percentage, seedling length, root length and vigor index.

Treatment
salt stresse0
Outcome
germination percentage, seedling length, root length, and vigor indexe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The genotypes' germination percentage, seedling length, root length, and vigor index decreased under salt stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–708 · show in text ↑
t0

“Safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–55 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 240 mM salt, tolerant genotypes lost 6-21% germination, while sensitive genotypes lost 46-65%.

Material
salt-tolerant genotypese0
Treatment
240 mM salt treatmente0
Outcome
germination percentagee0
Direction
reductione0
Value
6-21%e0
Qualifier
46-65%e0
Comparator
sensitive genotypese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the reduction in germination percentage of salt-tolerant genotypes was between 6-21%, it was between 46-65% in sensitive genotypes at 240 mM salt treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–871 · show in text ↑
t0

“Safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–55 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shufu, Sidwill, Finch, Yuyao and Oleic Leed were selected as tolerant genotypes.

Material
Shufu, Sidwill, Finch, Yuyao, Oleic Leede0
Outcome
tolerante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Five tolerant (Shufu, Sidwill, Finch, Yuyao, Oleic Leed)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 873–929 · show in text ↑
t0

“Safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–55 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Huaxian, Linas, 4022, Oker and Rehbein were selected as sensitive genotypes.

Material
Huaxian, Linas, 4022, Oker, Rehbeine0
Outcome
sensitivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sensitive (Huaxian, Linas, 4022, Oker, Rehbein) genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–991 · show in text ↑
t0

“Safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Proline content rose 26 to 56 fold at 180 mM salt.

Treatment
180 mM salt concentratione0
Outcome
proline contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
26 to 56 folde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The proline content of the genotypes increased by 26 to 56 fold at 180 mM salt concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1176–1268 · show in text ↑
t0

“Safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hydrogen peroxide content increased at 180 mM salt in both tolerant and sensitive genotypes.

Material
sensitive and tolerant genotypese0
Treatment
180 mM salt treatmente0
Outcome
hydrogen peroxide contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The hydrogen peroxide content of sensitive and tolerant genotypes increased at 180 mM salt treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1270–1370 · show in text ↑
t0

“Safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 240 mM salt, hydrogen peroxide content increased 6-50% in sensitive genotypes.

Material
sensitive genotypese0
Treatment
240 mM salt treatmente0
Outcome
hydrogen peroxide contente0
Direction
increasee0
Value
6-50%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at 240 mM salt treatment, the hydrogen peroxide content of the sensitive genotypes continued to increase by 6-50%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1376–1489 · show in text ↑
t0

“Safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 240 mM salt, hydrogen peroxide content decreased 10-30% in tolerant genotypes.

Material
tolerant genotypese0
Treatment
240 mM salt treatmente0
Outcome
hydrogen peroxide contente0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
10-30%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at 240 mM salt treatment, the hydrogen peroxide content of the sensitive genotypes continued to increase by 6-50%, hydrogen peroxide content decreased in tolerant genotypes by 10-30%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1376–1558 · show in text ↑
t0

“Safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 240 mM salt, MDA content increased 307-631% in sensitive genotypes.

Material
sensitive genotypese0
Treatment
240 mM salt treatmente0
Outcome
MDA contentse0
Direction
highere0
Value
307-631%e0
Comparator
tolerant genotypese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MDA contents increased in the sensitive and tolerant genotypes, but the level of increase was higher in sensitive genotypes (307-631%) than the tolerant genotypes (103-323%) at 240 mM salt treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1560–1758 · show in text ↑
t0

“Safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 240 mM salt, MDA content increased 103-323% in tolerant genotypes.

Material
tolerant genotypese0
Treatment
240 mM salt treatmente0
Outcome
MDA contentse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
103-323%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MDA contents increased in the sensitive and tolerant genotypes, but the level of increase was higher in sensitive genotypes (307-631%) than the tolerant genotypes (103-323%) at 240 mM salt treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1560–1758 · show in text ↑
t0

“Safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–55 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The genotype heatmap yielded 28 coefficients, five significant.

Outcome
coefficientse0
Value
28e0
Qualifier
5 of which were significante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The heatmap generated by means of sensitive and tolerant genotypes showed 28 coefficients and 5 of which were significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1760–1881 · show in text ↑
t0

“Safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–55 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Hydrogen peroxide and MDA changes were proposed as selection criteria alongside germination percentage.

Organ / stage
seedling stagee0
Outcome
useful selection criteriae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“They could be useful selection criteria along with germination percentages for determining tolerant and susceptible safflower genotypes at the seedling stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2009–2166 · show in text ↑

salinity · physiology: oxidative · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 1 positive, 5 negative or no effect

5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

salinity · growth · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Results agree

30 papers: 0 positive, 30 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.