Paper · 2024 · International Journal of Phytoremediation

Enriched biochars with silicon and calcium nanoparticles mitigated salt toxicity and improved safflower plant performance

Kazem Ghassemi-Golezani; Seyyed Amirreza Mousavi; Salar Farhangi-Abriz

11
claims
29
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Modifying biochar with nano-nutrients is one of the most effective methods in improving the efficiency of biochar in reducing the adverse effects of environmental stresses such as salinity on plant growth and productivity. The possible effects of solid biochar, nano-silicon dioxide enriched biochar, nano-calcium carbonate enriched biochar, and combined application of these enriched biochars on physiological performance of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) were evaluated under different levels of salt stress (non-saline, 6 and 12 dSm−1). Salt stress increased sodium content, reactive oxygen species generation, and antioxidant enzymes activity, but decreased potassium, calcium, magnesium, iron, zinc, silicon, photosynthetic pigments, leaf water content, and seed yield (by about 36%) of safflower plants. The addition of biochar forms to the saline soil improved growth (up to 24.6%) and seed yield (up to 37%) of safflower by reducing sodium accumulation (by about 32%) and ROS generation and enhancing nutrient uptake, photosynthetic pigments, and water contents of leaves. The combined forms of enriched biochars were the best treatment on reducing salt stress effects on safflower plants. Therefore, application of enriched biochars has a high potential to reduce the harmful effects of salt stress on plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt stress increased sodium content, reactive oxygen species generation and antioxidant enzyme activity in safflower.

Treatment
Salt stresse0
Outcome
sodium content, reactive oxygen species generation, and antioxidant enzymes activitye0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
non-salinee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Salt stress increased sodium content, reactive oxygen species generation, and antioxidant enzymes activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 545–651 · show in text ↑
t0

“safflower plant performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–121 · show in text ↑
e1

“non-saline”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–526 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt stress decreased potassium, calcium and magnesium in safflower.

Treatment
salt stresse0
Outcome
potassium, calcium, magnesiume1
Direction
decreasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“different levels of salt stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 483–514 · show in text ↑
e1

“decreased potassium, calcium, magnesium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–696 · show in text ↑
t0

“safflower plant performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt stress decreased iron, zinc and silicon in safflower.

Treatment
salt stresse0
Outcome
iron, zinc, silicone1
Direction
decreasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“different levels of salt stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 483–514 · show in text ↑
e1

“decreased potassium, calcium, magnesium, iron, zinc, silicon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–717 · show in text ↑
t0

“safflower plant performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt stress decreased photosynthetic pigments and leaf water content in safflower.

Treatment
salt stresse0
Outcome
photosynthetic pigments, leaf water contente1
Direction
decreasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“different levels of salt stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 483–514 · show in text ↑
e1

“decreased potassium, calcium, magnesium, iron, zinc, silicon, photosynthetic pigments, leaf water content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–762 · show in text ↑
t0

“safflower plant performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt stress decreased seed yield of safflower by about 36%.

Treatment
salt stresse0
Outcome
seed yielde1
Direction
decreasede1
Value
36%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“different levels of salt stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 483–514 · show in text ↑
e1

“decreased potassium, calcium, magnesium, iron, zinc, silicon, photosynthetic pigments, leaf water content, and seed yield (by about 36%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–793 · show in text ↑
t0

“safflower plant performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding biochar forms to saline soil improved safflower growth by up to 24.6%.

Treatment
addition of biochar formse0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
improvede0
Value
up to 24.6%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The addition of biochar forms to the saline soil improved growth (up to 24.6%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–893 · show in text ↑
t0

“safflower plant performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding biochar forms to saline soil improved safflower seed yield by up to 37%.

Treatment
addition of biochar formse0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
improvede0
Value
up to 37%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The addition of biochar forms to the saline soil improved growth (up to 24.6%) and seed yield (up to 37%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–920 · show in text ↑
t0

“safflower plant performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar addition reduced sodium accumulation by about 32%.

Treatment
addition of biochar formse0
Outcome
sodium accumulatione1
Direction
reducinge1
Value
32%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The addition of biochar forms to the saline soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–863 · show in text ↑
e1

“reducing sodium accumulation (by about 32%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–980 · show in text ↑
t0

“safflower plant performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar addition reduced ROS generation in safflower.

Treatment
addition of biochar formse0
Outcome
ROS generatione1
Direction
reducinge1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The addition of biochar forms to the saline soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–863 · show in text ↑
e1

“reducing sodium accumulation (by about 32%) and ROS generation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–999 · show in text ↑
t0

“safflower plant performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar addition enhanced nutrient uptake, photosynthetic pigments and water contents of leaves in safflower.

Treatment
addition of biochar formse0
Outcome
nutrient uptake, photosynthetic pigments, and water contents of leavese1
Direction
enhancinge1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The addition of biochar forms to the saline soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–863 · show in text ↑
e1

“enhancing nutrient uptake, photosynthetic pigments, and water contents of leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1004–1084 · show in text ↑
t0

“safflower plant performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined forms of enriched biochars were the best treatment for reducing salt stress effects on safflower.

Treatment
combined forms of enriched biocharse0
Outcome
reducing salt stress effectse0
Direction
best treatmente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combined forms of enriched biochars were the best treatment on reducing salt stress effects on safflower plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1086–1201 · show in text ↑

biochar · growth · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

salinity · physiology: oxidative · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 1 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

salinity · physiology: photosynthesis · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 2 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

salinity · yield · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 1 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

biochar · physiology: oxidative · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

salinity · nutrient: content · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Results agree

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

biochar · yield · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.