Paper · 2023 · Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology

Physiological and Biochemical Responses in Five Wheat Cultivars to Supplemental Irrigation

L. Moradi; A. Siosemardeh; Y. Sohrabi; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess changes in proline, Glycine Betaine (GB), photosynthetic pigment concentration, Membrane Stability Index (MSI), and grain yield of wheat cultivars induced by Supplemental Irrigation (SI) in the terminal growth stages. Two field experiments with four irrigation levels (rainfed, SI at booting stage, SI at booting and anthesis stages, SI at booting, anthesis, and grain filling stages) and five cultivars (Rejaw, Sardari, Homa, Azar2, and Sirwan) were conducted during the 2015-2017 growing seasons. Results indicated that, overall, SI increased cultivars' chlorophyll concentration, MSI, and grain yield. Proline and GB highly accumulated under drought stress, but rapidly decreased after SI; the severity of the decrease in proline concentration was more remarkable. Sardari and Azar2 cultivars exhibited greater MSI, proline, and GB accumulation during drought stress and more rapid recovery from drought. Our results suggest that the ability of the wheat cultivars to maintain functions during drought and recover after SI during the terminal growth stage is essential for determining final grain yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Supplemental irrigation increased wheat chlorophyll concentration and membrane stability index.

Treatment
SIe0
Outcome
chlorophyll concentration, MSIe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SI increased cultivars' chlorophyll concentration, MSI, and grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–645 · show in text ↑
t0

“Physiological and Biochemical Responses in Five Wheat Cultivars to Supplemental Irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Supplemental irrigation increased wheat grain yield.

Treatment
SIe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SI increased cultivars' chlorophyll concentration, MSI, and grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–645 · show in text ↑
t0

“Physiological and Biochemical Responses in Five Wheat Cultivars to Supplemental Irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–90 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Proline and glycine betaine accumulated under drought stress.

Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
Proline and GBe0
Direction
highly accumulatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Proline and GB highly accumulated under drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–701 · show in text ↑
t0

“Physiological and Biochemical Responses in Five Wheat Cultivars to Supplemental Irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Proline and glycine betaine rapidly decreased after supplemental irrigation, with a larger proline decline.

Treatment
SIe0
Outcome
Proline and GBe0
Direction
rapidly decreasede0
Qualifier
decrease in proline concentration was more remarkablee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Proline and GB highly accumulated under drought stress, but rapidly decreased after SI; the severity of the decrease in proline concentration was more remarkable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–808 · show in text ↑
t0

“Physiological and Biochemical Responses in Five Wheat Cultivars to Supplemental Irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–90 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sardari and Azar2 had greater MSI, proline and GB accumulation under drought and faster recovery.

Material
Sardari and Azar2 cultivarse0
Outcome
MSI, proline, and GB accumulatione0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
during drought stresse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sardari and Azar2 cultivars exhibited greater MSI, proline, and GB accumulation during drought stress and more rapid recovery from drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–948 · show in text ↑
t0

“Physiological and Biochemical Responses in Five Wheat Cultivars to Supplemental Irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–90 · show in text ↑

irrigation · physiology: oxidative · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 9 positive, 5 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

irrigation · physiology: osmolytes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 12 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.