Paper · 2023 · Nanomaterials

Conferring of Drought and Heat Stress Tolerance in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Genotypes and Their Response to Selenium Nanoparticles Application

Ahmad A. Omar; Yasmin M. Heikal; Ehab M. Zayed; et al.

16
claims
28
verbatim quotes
69
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In this study, the role of selenium nanoparticles (SeNPs, 10 mg·L−1) has been investigated in modulating the negative effects of drought and heat stresses on eight bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotype seedlings. Those genotypes included Giza-168, Giza-171, Misr-1, Misr-3, Shandweel-1, Sids-1, Sids-12, and Sids-14. The study included six treatments as follows: regular irrigation with 100% Field Capacity (FC) at a temperature of 23 ± 3 °C (T1), drought stress with 60% FC (T2), heat stress of 38 °C for 5 h·day−1 (T3), foliar spray of 10 mg·L−1 of SeNPs only (T4), a combination of drought stress with foliar spray of 10 mg·L−1 of SeNPs (T5), and heat stress with foliar spray of 10 mg·L−1 of SeNPs (T6). The experiment continued for 31 days. Foliar application of SeNPs improved the plant growth, morpho-physiological and biochemical responses, and expression of stress-responsive genes in wheat (T. aestivum L.) seedlings. Overall, morpho-physiological traits such as plant height (PH), shoot fresh weight (SFW), shoot dry weight (SDW), root fresh weight (RFW), and root dry weight (RDW) of wheat genotypes grown under different conditions ranged from 25.37–51.51 cm, 3.29–5.15 g, 0.50–1.97 g, 0.72–4.21 g, and 0.11–1.23 g, respectively. From the morpho-physiological perspective, drought stress had a greater detrimental impact on wheat plants than heat stress, whereas heat stress significantly impacted the expression of stress-responsive genes. Stress responses to drought and heat varied between wheat genotypes, suggesting that different genotypes are more resilient to stress. Exogenous spraying of 10 mg·L−1 of SeNPs improved the photosynthetic pigments, photosynthetic rate, gas exchange, and transpiration rate of wheat plants and enhanced drought and heat tolerance by increasing the activity of antioxidant enzymes including catalase (CAT), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), and superoxide dismutase (SOD) and the expression level of stress-responsive genes. Our results showed that spraying wheat seedlings with 10 mg·L−1 of SeNPs enhanced SOD activity for all genotypes as compared to the control, with the Sids-12 genotype having the highest value (196.43 U·mg−1 FW·min−1) and the Giza-168 genotype having the lowest (152.30 U·mg−1 FW·min−1). The expression of PIP1, LEA-1, HSP70, and HSP90 stress-responsive genes was more significant in tolerant genotypes (Giza-171 and Giza-168) than in sensitive ones (Misr-1 and Misr-3) in response to drought and heat stresses. Under stress conditions, the shoot and root fresh weights, photosynthetic pigment content, stomatal conductance (SC), and transpiration rate (TR) were positively correlated with plant height (PH), while root and shoot dry weights, malondialdehyde (MDA), proline, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), and APX were negatively correlated. Multivariate analysis and biplot results revealed that genotypes Giza-168, Giza-171, Sids-12, and Sids-14 performed well in both stress situations and were classified as stress-tolerant genotypes. These best genotypes may be employed in future breeding projects as tools to face climate change. This study concluded that various physio-biochemicals and gene expression attributes under drought and heat stress could be modulated by foliar application of SeNPs in wheat genotypes, potentially alleviating the adverse effects of drought and heat stress.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar SeNPs improved wheat seedling growth and morphophysiological and biochemical responses.

Treatment
SeNPse0
Outcome
plant growth, morpho-physiological and biochemical responsese0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar application of SeNPs improved the plant growth, morpho-physiological and biochemical responses, and expression of stress-responsive genes in wheat (T. aestivum L.) seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 752–932 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar SeNPs improved expression of wheat stress-responsive genes.

Treatment
SeNPse0
Outcome
expression of stress-responsive genese0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar application of SeNPs improved the plant growth, morpho-physiological and biochemical responses, and expression of stress-responsive genes in wheat (T. aestivum L.) seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 752–932 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought had a greater detrimental impact on wheat than heat.

Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
impact on wheat plantse0
Direction
greater detrimentale0
Comparator
heat stresse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drought stress had a greater detrimental impact on wheat plants than heat stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1292–1372 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Heat significantly affected expression of stress-responsive genes in wheat.

Treatment
heat stresse0
Outcome
expression of stress-responsive genese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“heat stress significantly impacted the expression of stress-responsive genes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1382–1458 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–56 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought and heat responses varied among wheat genotypes.

Material
wheat genotypese0
Outcome
Stress responses to drought and heate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stress responses to drought and heat varied between wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1460–1527 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SeNP spraying improved wheat photosynthetic pigments, photosynthetic rate, and gas exchange.

Treatment
10 mg·L−1 of SeNPse0
Outcome
photosynthetic pigments, photosynthetic rate, gas exchangee0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Exogenous spraying of 10 mg·L−1 of SeNPs improved the photosynthetic pigments, photosynthetic rate, gas exchange, and transpiration rate of wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1595–1747 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SeNP spraying improved wheat transpiration rate.

Treatment
10 mg·L−1 of SeNPse0
Outcome
transpiration ratee0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Exogenous spraying of 10 mg·L−1 of SeNPs improved the photosynthetic pigments, photosynthetic rate, gas exchange, and transpiration rate of wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1595–1747 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SeNPs increased antioxidant enzyme activity and stress-responsive gene expression, which the authors linked to enhanced drought and heat tolerance.

Gene
antioxidant enzymese0
Outcome
drought and heat tolerancee0
Qualifier
increasing the activity of antioxidant enzymese0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“enhanced drought and heat tolerance by increasing the activity of antioxidant enzymes including catalase (CAT), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), and superoxide dismutase (SOD) and the expression level of stress-responsive genes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1752–1974 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SeNPs enhanced SOD activity across all wheat genotypes compared with control.

Treatment
10 mg·L−1 of SeNPse0
Gene
SODe0
Outcome
SOD activitye0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spraying wheat seedlings with 10 mg·L−1 of SeNPs enhanced SOD activity for all genotypes as compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2000–2115 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sids-12 had the highest SOD activity at 196.43 U·mg−1 FW·min−1.

Material
Sids-12e0
Outcome
SOD activitye1
Direction
higheste0
Value
196.43 U·mg−1 FW·min−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sids-12 genotype having the highest value (196.43 U·mg−1 FW·min−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2126–2192 · show in text ↑
e1

“enhanced SOD activity for all genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2049–2088 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–56 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Giza-168 had the lowest SOD activity at 152.30 U·mg−1 FW·min−1.

Material
Giza-168e0
Outcome
SOD activitye1
Direction
loweste0
Value
152.30 U·mg−1 FW·min−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Giza-168 genotype having the lowest (152.30 U·mg−1 FW·min−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2201–2261 · show in text ↑
e1

“enhanced SOD activity for all genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2049–2088 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–56 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Stress-responsive gene expression was more significant in tolerant Giza-171 and Giza-168 than sensitive Misr-1 and Misr-3.

Material
tolerant genotypese0
Gene
PIP1, LEA-1, HSP70, and HSP90e0
Outcome
expressione0
Direction
more significante0
Comparator
sensitive onese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The expression of PIP1, LEA-1, HSP70, and HSP90 stress-responsive genes was more significant in tolerant genotypes (Giza-171 and Giza-168) than in sensitive ones (Misr-1 and Misr-3) in response to drought and heat stresses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2263–2485 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–56 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under stress, fresh weights, photosynthetic pigment content, stomatal conductance, and transpiration rate correlated positively with plant height.

Outcome
shoot and root fresh weights, photosynthetic pigment content, stomatal conductance (SC), and transpiration rate (TR)e0
Direction
positivelye0
Comparator
plant height (PH)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under stress conditions, the shoot and root fresh weights, photosynthetic pigment content, stomatal conductance (SC), and transpiration rate (TR) were positively correlated with plant height (PH)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2487–2682 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–56 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under stress, root and shoot dry weights, MDA, proline, H2O2, and APX correlated negatively with plant height.

Outcome
root and shoot dry weights, malondialdehyde (MDA), proline, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), and APXe0
Direction
negativelye0
Comparator
plant height (PH)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while root and shoot dry weights, malondialdehyde (MDA), proline, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), and APX were negatively correlated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2684–2810 · show in text ↑
e1

“with plant height (PH)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2660–2682 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–56 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Giza-168, Giza-171, Sids-12, and Sids-14 performed well in both stress conditions and were classified as tolerant.

Material
Giza-168, Giza-171, Sids-12, and Sids-14e0
Outcome
performed well in both stress situations and were classified as stress-tolerant genotypese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“genotypes Giza-168, Giza-171, Sids-12, and Sids-14 performed well in both stress situations and were classified as stress-tolerant genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2867–3007 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–56 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose using the tolerant genotypes in future breeding for climate change.

Outcome
may be employed in future breeding projects as tools to face climate changee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These best genotypes may be employed in future breeding projects as tools to face climate change”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3009–3105 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–56 · show in text ↑

drought · organism · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 2 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.