Paper · 2023 · Geoderma

Enhanced plant growth in the presence of earthworms correlates with changes in soil microbiota but not nutrient availability

M.E. Hodson; P. Brailey-Crane; W.L. Burn; et al.

15
claims
30
verbatim quotes
29
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Earthworms enhance plant growth but the precise mechanism by which this occurs is not known. An understanding of the mechanism could potentially support changes in agricultural management reducing fertiliser usage and therefore costs and the carbon footprint of agriculture. We conducted a factorial experiment in which 5 strains of wheat were grown in the presence and absence of earthworms under regular watering and droughted conditions. The different wheat strains all responded in a similar fashion. Plant biomass was greater in the presence of earthworms and under regular watering. The presence of earthworms reduced the impact of drought on plant biomass and also slowed down the rate of drying of the droughted soils. Plant nutrient content (N, P, Si) showed no consistent pattern with treatments but plant total N, P and Si mirrored plant biomass and decreased in the order earthworm-present watered > earthworm-present droughted > earthworm-absent watered > earthworm-absent droughted. Nutrient availability in the soil, as assessed by chemical extractions showed no consistent pattern with treatments. Differential gene expression of plants was greater between watering treatments than between earthworm treatments. Genes that were differentially expressed between the earthworm treatments predominantly related to plant defences, abiotic stress and control of plant growth though a couple were linked to both nitrogen cycling and stress responses. The soil microbiome of the earthworm-present treatments was more associated with nutrient-rich environments, the promotion of plant growth and the suppression of plant pathogens whilst that of the earthworm-absent treatments included a variety of plant pathogens. Our data are consistent with enhanced plant growth being due to changes in the microbiome brought about by earthworm processing of the soil rather than changes in nutrient availability directly due to earthworm activity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The different wheat strains responded similarly to the treatments.

Material
different wheat strainse1
Outcome
responded in a similar fashione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The different wheat strains all responded in a similar fashion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 441–503 · show in text ↑
e2

“We conducted a factorial experiment in which 5 strains of wheat were grown in the presence and absence of earthworms under regular watering and droughted conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 275–439 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Earthworm presence increased plant biomass compared to earthworm absence.

Treatment
presence of earthwormse3
Interactor
earthwormCrassiclitellatae3other
Outcome
Plant biomasse3
Direction
greatere3
Comparator
absence of earthwormse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“We conducted a factorial experiment in which 5 strains of wheat were grown in the presence and absence of earthworms under regular watering and droughted conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 275–439 · show in text ↑
e3

“Plant biomass was greater in the presence of earthworms and under regular watering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–587 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Regular watering increased plant biomass compared to droughted conditions.

Treatment
regular wateringe3
Outcome
Plant biomasse3
Direction
greatere3
Comparator
droughted conditionse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“We conducted a factorial experiment in which 5 strains of wheat were grown in the presence and absence of earthworms under regular watering and droughted conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 275–439 · show in text ↑
e3

“Plant biomass was greater in the presence of earthworms and under regular watering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–587 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Earthworm presence reduced the impact of drought on plant biomass.

Treatment
presence of earthwormse4
Interactor
earthwormCrassiclitellatae4other
Outcome
impact of drought on plant biomasse4
Direction
reducede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“We conducted a factorial experiment in which 5 strains of wheat were grown in the presence and absence of earthworms under regular watering and droughted conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 275–439 · show in text ↑
e4

“The presence of earthworms reduced the impact of drought on plant biomass and also slowed down the rate of drying of the droughted soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–725 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Earthworm presence slowed the rate of drying of droughted soils.

Treatment
presence of earthwormse4
Interactor
earthwormCrassiclitellatae4other
Outcome
rate of drying of the droughted soilse4
Direction
slowed downe4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“We conducted a factorial experiment in which 5 strains of wheat were grown in the presence and absence of earthworms under regular watering and droughted conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 275–439 · show in text ↑
e4

“The presence of earthworms reduced the impact of drought on plant biomass and also slowed down the rate of drying of the droughted soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–725 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant nutrient content (N, P, Si) showed no consistent pattern with treatments.

Outcome
Plant nutrient content (N, P, Si)e5
Qualifier
no consistent pattern with treatmentse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“We conducted a factorial experiment in which 5 strains of wheat were grown in the presence and absence of earthworms under regular watering and droughted conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 275–439 · show in text ↑
e5

“Plant nutrient content (N, P, Si) showed no consistent pattern with treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–805 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant total N, P and Si decreased in the order earthworm-present watered > earthworm-present droughted > earthworm-absent watered > earthworm-absent droughted.

Interactor
earthwormCrassiclitellatae6other
Outcome
plant total N, P and Sie6
Direction
decreasede6
Qualifier
in the order earthworm-present watered > earthworm-present droughted > earthworm-absent watered > earthworm-absent droughtede6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“We conducted a factorial experiment in which 5 strains of wheat were grown in the presence and absence of earthworms under regular watering and droughted conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 275–439 · show in text ↑
e6

“Plant total N, P and Si mirrored plant biomass and decreased in the order earthworm-present watered > earthworm-present droughted > earthworm-absent watered > earthworm-absent droughted”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 810–995 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant total N, P and Si mirrored plant biomass.

Outcome
plant total N, P and Sie6
Comparator
plant biomasse6

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“We conducted a factorial experiment in which 5 strains of wheat were grown in the presence and absence of earthworms under regular watering and droughted conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 275–439 · show in text ↑
e6

“Plant total N, P and Si mirrored plant biomass and decreased in the order earthworm-present watered > earthworm-present droughted > earthworm-absent watered > earthworm-absent droughted”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 810–995 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient availability in the soil showed no consistent pattern with treatments.

Outcome
Nutrient availability in the soile7
Qualifier
no consistent pattern with treatmentse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“We conducted a factorial experiment in which 5 strains of wheat were grown in the presence and absence of earthworms under regular watering and droughted conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 275–439 · show in text ↑
e7

“Nutrient availability in the soil, as assessed by chemical extractions showed no consistent pattern with treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Differential gene expression of wheat was greater between watering treatments than between earthworm treatments.

Treatment
watering treatmentse3
Outcome
Differential gene expression of plantse3
Direction
greatere3
Comparator
earthworm treatmentse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“We conducted a factorial experiment in which 5 strains of wheat were grown in the presence and absence of earthworms under regular watering and droughted conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 275–439 · show in text ↑
e3

“Differential gene expression of plants was greater between watering treatments than between earthworm treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1114–1226 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genes differentially expressed between earthworm treatments related predominantly to plant defences, abiotic stress and control of plant growth.

Treatment
earthworm treatmentse3
Outcome
plant defences, abiotic stress and control of plant growthe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“We conducted a factorial experiment in which 5 strains of wheat were grown in the presence and absence of earthworms under regular watering and droughted conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 275–439 · show in text ↑
e3

“Genes that were differentially expressed between the earthworm treatments predominantly related to plant defences, abiotic stress and control of plant growth though a couple were linked to both nitrogen cycling and stress responses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1228–1459 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A couple of the genes differentially expressed between earthworm treatments were linked to both nitrogen cycling and stress responses.

Outcome
nitrogen cycling and stress responsese3
Qualifier
a couple were linked to bothe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“We conducted a factorial experiment in which 5 strains of wheat were grown in the presence and absence of earthworms under regular watering and droughted conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 275–439 · show in text ↑
e3

“Genes that were differentially expressed between the earthworm treatments predominantly related to plant defences, abiotic stress and control of plant growth though a couple were linked to both nitrogen cycling and stress responses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1228–1459 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The soil microbiome of earthworm-present treatments was more associated with nutrient-rich environments, plant growth promotion and suppression of plant pathogens.

Treatment
earthworm-present treatmentse3
Interactor
plant pathogense3pathogen
Outcome
soil microbiomee3
Qualifier
more associated with nutrient-rich environments, the promotion of plant growth and the suppression of plant pathogense3

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“We conducted a factorial experiment in which 5 strains of wheat were grown in the presence and absence of earthworms under regular watering and droughted conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 275–439 · show in text ↑
e3

“The soil microbiome of the earthworm-present treatments was more associated with nutrient-rich environments, the promotion of plant growth and the suppression of plant pathogens whilst that of the earthworm-absent treatments included a variety of plant pathogens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1461–1723 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The soil microbiome of earthworm-absent treatments included a variety of plant pathogens.

Treatment
earthworm-absent treatmentse3
Interactor
plant pathogense3pathogen
Outcome
soil microbiomee3
Qualifier
included a variety of plant pathogense3

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“We conducted a factorial experiment in which 5 strains of wheat were grown in the presence and absence of earthworms under regular watering and droughted conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 275–439 · show in text ↑
e3

“The soil microbiome of the earthworm-present treatments was more associated with nutrient-rich environments, the promotion of plant growth and the suppression of plant pathogens whilst that of the earthworm-absent treatments included a variety of plant pathogens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1461–1723 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Enhanced wheat growth is due to changes in the soil microbiome caused by earthworm processing of the soil rather than changes in nutrient availability.

Interactor
earthwormCrassiclitellatae3other
Outcome
enhanced plant growthe3
Qualifier
changes in the microbiomee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“We conducted a factorial experiment in which 5 strains of wheat were grown in the presence and absence of earthworms under regular watering and droughted conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 275–439 · show in text ↑
e3

“Our data are consistent with enhanced plant growth being due to changes in the microbiome brought about by earthworm processing of the soil rather than changes in nutrient availability directly due to earthworm activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1725–1944 · show in text ↑

irrigation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

242 papers: 177 positive, 65 negative or no effect

176 papers in the same direction as this paper · 61 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

238 papers more in this group

See all 242 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.