Paper · 2023 · Journal of Mycopathological research

Evaluation of biocontrol agents, botanicals and fungicidesagainst White root rot of apple caused by D. necatrixunder pot conditions

Naveen Kumar; Shalini Verma; Vinay Kumar kardam

13
claims
28
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Evaluation of integrated management module against white root rot of apple caused by D. necatrix under pot conditions was checked.Evaluation of twenty three different combinations revealed that all the treatment combinations significantly lowered the disease incidence of W hite root rot of apple in comparison to control. The combinations viz.,T. viride + carbendazim, T. viride + (pyraclostrobin + metiram), T. viride + (flusilazole + carbendazim), B. oleracea var. capitata + carbendazim , B. oleracea var. capitata + (pyraclostrobin + metiram), B. oleracea var. capitata + (flusilazole + carbendazim), T. viride + B. oleracea var. capitata + carbendazim, T. viride + B. oleracea var. capitata + (pyraclostrobin + metiram), T. viride + B. oleracea var. capitata + (flusilazole + carbendazim), T. harzianum + carbendazim , T. harzianum + (pyraclostrobin + metiram), T. harzianum + (flusilazole + carbendazim), T. harzianum + B. oleracea var. capitata + carbendazim, T. harzianum + B. oleracea var. capitata + (pyraclostrobin + metiram), T. harzianum+ B. oleracea var. capitata + (flusilazole + carbendazim), carbendazim , pyraclostrobin + metiram and flusilazole + carbendazim were highly effective and provided complete control of the disease when applied twice at 7 days interval after soil inoculation. The combinations T. viride + B. oleracea var. capitata, T. harzianum + B. oleracea var. capitata, T. viride, T. harzianum and B. oleracea var. capitata were least effective showing only 11.11, 11.11, 25.92, 25.92 and 11.11 per cent disease incidence respectively. After 15 days of pathogen inoculation there was no disease incidence in any one of the treatment and disease appeared (33.33%) in T. viride and T. harzianum after 30 days of inoculation. It increased at slower rate (33.33 to 44.44 %) in T. viride + B. oleracea var. capitata, T. harzianum + B. oleracea var. capitata, T. viride and T. harzianum to 45 days. The rot weight of above treatments ranged between 24.47g-29.07g and the pH of the soil of all treatments ranged between 7.0-7.5. The total microbial count of treated plants lied between 10.67-14.3310 4 .

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All treatment combinations significantly lowered white root rot incidence on apple compared with control.

Treatment
treatment combinationse1
Interactor
D. necatrixt0pathogen
Outcome
disease incidencee1
Direction
lowerede1
Comparator
controle1
Setting
pot conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“all the treatment combinations significantly lowered the disease incidence of W hite root rot of apple in comparison to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 194–321 · show in text ↑
e0

“Evaluation of integrated management module against white root rot of apple caused by D. necatrix under pot conditions was checked”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–129 · show in text ↑
t0

“Evaluation of biocontrol agents, botanicals and fungicidesagainst White root rot of apple caused by D. necatrixunder pot conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbendazim, pyraclostrobin + metiram and flusilazole + carbendazim gave complete control of white root rot when applied twice at 7-day intervals.

Treatment
carbendazim, pyraclostrobin + metiram and flusilazole + carbendazime2
Interactor
D. necatrixt0pathogen
Outcome
complete control of the diseasee2
Direction
decreaseinferrede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“carbendazim , pyraclostrobin + metiram and flusilazole + carbendazim were highly effective and provided complete control of the disease when applied twice at 7 days interval after soil inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1306 · show in text ↑
t0

“Evaluation of biocontrol agents, botanicals and fungicidesagainst White root rot of apple caused by D. necatrixunder pot conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T. viride + B. oleracea var. capitata was least effective, with 11.11% disease incidence.

Treatment
T. viride + B. oleracea var. capitatae3
Interactor
D. necatrixt0pathogen
Second interactor
T. viridee3biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease incidencee3
Direction
lowerinferrede3
Value
11.11e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The combinations T. viride + B. oleracea var. capitata, T. harzianum + B. oleracea var. capitata, T. viride, T. harzianum and B. oleracea var. capitata were least effective showing only 11.11, 11.11, 25.92, 25.92 and 11.11 per cent disease incidence respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1570 · show in text ↑
t0

“Evaluation of biocontrol agents, botanicals and fungicidesagainst White root rot of apple caused by D. necatrixunder pot conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T. harzianum + B. oleracea var. capitata was least effective, with 11.11% disease incidence.

Treatment
T. harzianum + B. oleracea var. capitatae3
Interactor
D. necatrixt0pathogen
Second interactor
T. harzianume3biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease incidencee3
Direction
lowerinferrede3
Value
11.11e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The combinations T. viride + B. oleracea var. capitata, T. harzianum + B. oleracea var. capitata, T. viride, T. harzianum and B. oleracea var. capitata were least effective showing only 11.11, 11.11, 25.92, 25.92 and 11.11 per cent disease incidence respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1570 · show in text ↑
t0

“Evaluation of biocontrol agents, botanicals and fungicidesagainst White root rot of apple caused by D. necatrixunder pot conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T. viride was least effective, with 25.92% disease incidence.

Treatment
T. viridee3
Interactor
D. necatrixt0pathogen
Second interactor
T. viridee3biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease incidencee3
Direction
lowerinferrede3
Value
25.92e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The combinations T. viride + B. oleracea var. capitata, T. harzianum + B. oleracea var. capitata, T. viride, T. harzianum and B. oleracea var. capitata were least effective showing only 11.11, 11.11, 25.92, 25.92 and 11.11 per cent disease incidence respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1570 · show in text ↑
t0

“Evaluation of biocontrol agents, botanicals and fungicidesagainst White root rot of apple caused by D. necatrixunder pot conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T. harzianum was least effective, with 25.92% disease incidence.

Treatment
T. harzianume3
Interactor
D. necatrixt0pathogen
Second interactor
T. harzianume3biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease incidencee3
Direction
lowerinferrede3
Value
25.92e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The combinations T. viride + B. oleracea var. capitata, T. harzianum + B. oleracea var. capitata, T. viride, T. harzianum and B. oleracea var. capitata were least effective showing only 11.11, 11.11, 25.92, 25.92 and 11.11 per cent disease incidence respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1570 · show in text ↑
t0

“Evaluation of biocontrol agents, botanicals and fungicidesagainst White root rot of apple caused by D. necatrixunder pot conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. oleracea var. capitata alone was least effective, with 11.11% disease incidence.

Treatment
B. oleracea var. capitatae3
Interactor
D. necatrixt0pathogen
Outcome
disease incidencee3
Direction
lowerinferrede3
Value
11.11e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The combinations T. viride + B. oleracea var. capitata, T. harzianum + B. oleracea var. capitata, T. viride, T. harzianum and B. oleracea var. capitata were least effective showing only 11.11, 11.11, 25.92, 25.92 and 11.11 per cent disease incidence respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1570 · show in text ↑
t0

“Evaluation of biocontrol agents, botanicals and fungicidesagainst White root rot of apple caused by D. necatrixunder pot conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–131 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No disease incidence was seen in any treatment 15 days after pathogen inoculation.

Interactor
D. necatrixt0pathogen
Outcome
disease incidencee4
Qualifier
After 15 days of pathogen inoculatione4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“After 15 days of pathogen inoculation there was no disease incidence in any one of the treatment and disease appeared (33.33%) in T. viride and T. harzianum after 30 days of inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1572–1757 · show in text ↑
t0

“Evaluation of biocontrol agents, botanicals and fungicidesagainst White root rot of apple caused by D. necatrixunder pot conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–131 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Disease incidence of 33.33% appeared in T. viride and T. harzianum treatments after 30 days of inoculation.

Treatment
T. viride and T. harzianume4
Interactor
D. necatrixt0pathogen
Second interactor
T. viride and T. harzianume4biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease incidencee4
Value
33.33%e4
Qualifier
after 30 days of inoculatione4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“After 15 days of pathogen inoculation there was no disease incidence in any one of the treatment and disease appeared (33.33%) in T. viride and T. harzianum after 30 days of inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1572–1757 · show in text ↑
t0

“Evaluation of biocontrol agents, botanicals and fungicidesagainst White root rot of apple caused by D. necatrixunder pot conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Disease incidence in four combinations rose more slowly, to 33.33 to 44.44%, up to 45 days.

Treatment
T. viride + B. oleracea var. capitata, T. harzianum + B. oleracea var. capitata, T. viride and T. harzianume5
Interactor
D. necatrixt0pathogen
Outcome
disease incidencee1
Direction
increased at slower ratee5
Value
33.33 to 44.44 %e5
Qualifier
to 45 dayse5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“It increased at slower rate (33.33 to 44.44 %) in T. viride + B. oleracea var. capitata, T. harzianum + B. oleracea var. capitata, T. viride and T. harzianum to 45 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1759–1927 · show in text ↑
e1

“all the treatment combinations significantly lowered the disease incidence of W hite root rot of apple in comparison to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 194–321 · show in text ↑
t0

“Evaluation of biocontrol agents, botanicals and fungicidesagainst White root rot of apple caused by D. necatrixunder pot conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–131 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The rot weight of the above treatments on apple ranged between 24.47 g and 29.07 g.

Outcome
rot weighte6
Value
24.47g-29.07ge6
Qualifier
of above treatmentse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“The rot weight of above treatments ranged between 24.47g-29.07g and the pH of the soil of all treatments ranged between 7.0-7.5. The total microbial count of treated plants lied between 10.67-14.3310 4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1929–2130 · show in text ↑
t0

“Evaluation of biocontrol agents, botanicals and fungicidesagainst White root rot of apple caused by D. necatrixunder pot conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–131 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil pH of all treatments ranged between 7.0 and 7.5.

Outcome
pH of the soile6
Value
7.0-7.5e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“The rot weight of above treatments ranged between 24.47g-29.07g and the pH of the soil of all treatments ranged between 7.0-7.5. The total microbial count of treated plants lied between 10.67-14.3310 4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1929–2130 · show in text ↑
t0

“Evaluation of biocontrol agents, botanicals and fungicidesagainst White root rot of apple caused by D. necatrixunder pot conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–131 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The total microbial count of treated plants lay between 10.67 and 14.33 (as printed, ×10^4).

Outcome
total microbial counte6
Value
10.67-14.3310 4e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“The rot weight of above treatments ranged between 24.47g-29.07g and the pH of the soil of all treatments ranged between 7.0-7.5. The total microbial count of treated plants lied between 10.67-14.3310 4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1929–2130 · show in text ↑
t0

“Evaluation of biocontrol agents, botanicals and fungicidesagainst White root rot of apple caused by D. necatrixunder pot conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–131 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

pyraclostrobin · control · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

flusilazole · control · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

carbendazim · control · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.