Paper · 2023 · Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science

Grape pomace's potential on semi‐arid soil health enhances performance of maize, wheat, and grape crops

Isaac K. Mpanga; Günter Neumann; Judith K. Brown; et al.

5
claims
6
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Abstract Background Grape pomace (GP) is a by‐product of wineries after filtering the grape juice for wine production. GP contains seeds, pulp, skin, and stalks with acidic properties, and it is normally composted before using as a soil amendment. However, composting GP requires more time, labor, and equipment; furthermore, composting loses some of the desirable organic acids for arid soils. The acidic properties of these organic acids and the plant nutrients in GP make it a desirable amendment for arid soils in both non‐composted and composted forms. Aim This study investigates the potential of directly applying GP as a soil amendment and its impact on arid soil health and plant performance. Methods To test the potential of non‐composted GP as a soil amendment, greenhouse and field studies were conducted by combining GP with existing management practices (manure application for soil used in the greenhouse study and fertigation for the field study) to assess the effects of GP on soil health and crop (maize, wheat, and grape) performance. Results Adding 5% GP to an alkaline soil significantly increased maize and wheat growth and shoot nutrient concentrations in the greenhouse and grapes in the field (48% yield increase). The significance of GP on maize, wheat, and grapes was associated with soil nutrient enhancements (i.e., nutrients supplied, increase in organic matter and microbial biomass increase, reduction in pH, and better nutrient mobilization). Conclusion GP has the potential for direct use as a soil amendment for soil and crop health improvement, especially in arid soils with high pH and limited soil organic matter.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding 5% grape pomace to an alkaline soil significantly increased maize growth and shoot nutrient concentrations in the greenhouse.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
Adding 5% GP to an alkaline soile1
Outcome
growth and shoot nutrient concentrationse1
Direction
increasede1
Setting
greenhousee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Adding 5% GP to an alkaline soil significantly increased maize and wheat growth and shoot nutrient concentrations in the greenhouse and grapes in the field (48% yield increase)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1238 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding 5% grape pomace to an alkaline soil significantly increased wheat growth and shoot nutrient concentrations in the greenhouse.

Treatment
Adding 5% GP to an alkaline soile1
Outcome
growth and shoot nutrient concentrationse1
Direction
increasede1
Setting
greenhousee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Adding 5% GP to an alkaline soil significantly increased maize and wheat growth and shoot nutrient concentrations in the greenhouse and grapes in the field (48% yield increase)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1238 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding 5% grape pomace to an alkaline soil increased grape yield by 48% in the field.

Taxon
grapese1
Treatment
Adding 5% GP to an alkaline soile1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
increasee1
Value
48%e1
Setting
fielde1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“Adding 5% GP to an alkaline soil significantly increased maize and wheat growth and shoot nutrient concentrations in the greenhouse and grapes in the field (48% yield increase)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1238 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The effects of grape pomace on maize, wheat and grapes were associated with soil nutrient enhancements.

Taxon
maize, wheat, and grapese2
Outcome
significance of GPe2
Qualifier
soil nutrient enhancementse2

Verbatim

e2

“The significance of GP on maize, wheat, and grapes was associated with soil nutrient enhancements (i.e., nutrients supplied, increase in organic matter and microbial biomass increase, reduction in pH, and better nutrient mobilization)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1240–1474 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Grape pomace has potential for direct use as a soil amendment for soil and crop health, especially in arid soils.

Taxon
maize, wheat, and grapet0
Outcome
direct use as a soil amendmente3

Verbatim

t0

“Grape pomace's potential on semi‐arid soil health enhances performance of maize, wheat, and grape crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–103 · show in text ↑
e3

“GP has the potential for direct use as a soil amendment for soil and crop health improvement, especially in arid soils with high pH and limited soil organic matter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1487–1650 · show in text ↑

alkalinity · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 5 positive, 11 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

alkalinity · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 5 positive, 13 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

alkalinity · yield · VitisResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.