Paper · 2023 · Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi

Phenological and Morphological Response of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Rhizobia and Azotobacter Inoculation

Engin TAKIL; Nihal KAYAN

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
3
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Excessive use of nitrogen has become a threat to human health and the environment due to high concentrations of nitrate and nitrite accumulating in surface and ground waters. Biological dinitrogen fixation (N2) is a very important natural process in world agriculture. Rhizobia is a common name for a certain Gram-negative group of Alphaproteobacteria and Betaproteobacteria that can form nodules on the root and fix nitrogen in symbiosis with legumes as their host plants. Azotobacter spp. is a free-living microorganism that has the ability to fix atmospheric nitrogen into the soil. Field trials were carried out of Eskişehir Osmangazi University Field Crops Department experiment areas during the production season of 2017 and 2019. The study was evaluated the effects on morphological and phenologocial characters of two N doses (0 and 25 kg ha-1 N), four bacteria inoculations (control, Rhizobia, Azotobacter, Rhizobia + Azotobacter) on chickpea cultivars (Azkan, Akca, Cakir, Isik). Experiment arranged in split split plot experimental design with three replications. Nitrogen application positively affected number of days to emergence, number of branches, branch diameter and grain yield. Phenological and morphological properties affected by climate conditions. The high temperature caused the number of days to emergence, number of days to flowering and number of days to maturity to be earlier in the second year. Plant height, first pod height and grain yield were higher first year than second year due to high precipitation. While the response of the cultivars was different in terms of phenological properties, Azkan cultivar gave the best results in terms of morphological properties. Rhizobia + Azotobacter inoculation gave the best results in terms of phenological and morphological characteristics except for number of days to maturity. Rhizobia + Azotobacter inoculation can lead to additional income generation of the farming community in Turkey. The use of biofertilizers may reduce the application of chemical fertilizers and we get healthy, pollution-free production for a better future for our increasing populations.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen application increased chickpea days to emergence, branching, branch diameter and grain yield.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Nitrogen applicatione0
Outcome
number of days to emergence, number of branches, branch diameter and grain yielde0
Direction
positively affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“Nitrogen application positively affected number of days to emergence, number of branches, branch diameter and grain yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1075–1197 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Climate conditions affected chickpea phenological and morphological properties.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Outcome
Phenological and morphological propertiese0
Setting
climate conditionse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“Phenological and morphological properties affected by climate conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1198–1271 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High temperature advanced chickpea emergence, flowering and maturity in the second year.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
high temperaturee0
Outcome
number of days to emergence, number of days to flowering and number of days to maturitye0
Direction
earliere0
Comparator
second yeare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“The high temperature caused the number of days to emergence, number of days to flowering and number of days to maturity to be earlier in the second year.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1272–1425 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chickpea plant and first pod height and grain yield were higher in the first year than the second.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Outcome
Plant height, first pod height and grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
second yeare0
Setting
first yeare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“Plant height, first pod height and grain yield were higher first year than second year due to high precipitation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1426–1539 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chickpea cultivars differed in phenological properties.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Outcome
response of the cultivars was different in terms of phenological propertiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“the response of the cultivars was different in terms of phenological properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1546–1625 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azkan performed best for chickpea morphological properties.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
Azkane0
Outcome
morphological propertiese0
Direction
beste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“Azkan cultivar gave the best results in terms of morphological properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1627–1700 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined Rhizobia and Azotobacter inoculation performed best for chickpea phenological and morphological traits except days to maturity.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Rhizobia + Azotobacter inoculatione0
Interactor
Rhizobiae0symbiont
Second interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere0other
Outcome
phenological and morphological characteristicse0
Direction
beste0
Qualifier
except for number of days to maturitye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“Rhizobia + Azotobacter inoculation gave the best results in terms of phenological and morphological characteristics except for number of days to maturity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1702–1856 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Combined inoculation may generate additional farming income in Turkey.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Rhizobia + Azotobacter inoculatione0
Outcome
additional income generatione0
Setting
Turkeye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“Rhizobia + Azotobacter inoculation can lead to additional income generation of the farming community in Turkey.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1857–1968 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

102 papers: 93 positive, 9 negative or no effect

92 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

98 papers more in this group

See all 102 papers →

inoculation · quality: phytochemicals · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.