Paper · 2023 · Egyptian Journal of Soil Science

Maximize faba bean productivity under salinity conditions

mohamed elsherpiny

15
claims
31
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Saline soil can be difficult to manage, as it lacks the nutrients needed for plant growth, but with the use of agricultural techniques and appropriate fertilization programs, agricultural productivity can be increased from these soils. So, a field trial was implemented to evaluate the possibility of alleviation of oxidative-stress induced by soil salinity stress on faba bean plant via soil addition of gypsum and compost and foliar application of selenium at different rates. Four soil amendment treatments [T0: Without any soil addition (control); T1: Gypsum at rate of 7.2 Mg ha-1; T2: Compost at rate of 7.2 Mg ha-1; T3: Gypsum +compost at rate of 3.6 Mg ha-1 for each of them] represented the main plots. While five selenium rates [Se0: Without selenium (control); Se1: With selenium (2.5 Se mgL-1); Se2: With selenium (5.0 Se mgL-1); Se3: With selenium (7.5 Se mgL-1); Se4: With selenium (10.0 Se mgL-1)] were allocated in the sub plots. The maximum values of both MDA and proline (9.51 and 9.61 for MDA and 6.64 and 6.71 for proline in both studied seasons, respectively) were achieved under control treatment. While the lowest one (4.99 and 5.05 for MDA and 3.84 and 3.89 for proline in the 1st and 2nd seasons, respectively) were realized under the combined treatment (gypsum+ compost). Concerning the selenium treatments, the maximum values of both MDA and proline (7.61 and 7.7 for MDA and 5.71 and 5.79 for proline in both studied seasons, respectively) were achieved with plants sprayed with 10.0 Se mg L-1 followed by the control treatment (grown without Se), while the lowest one (6.35 and6.44 for MDA and 4.95 and 5.01 for proline in both seasons, respectively) were realized with plants sprayed with 5.0 Se mg L-1. On the other hand, the combined treatment of gypsum and compost was the most effective in achieving the highest values for all traits of growth performance and productivity, followed by the treatment of compost alone then gypsum alone which was less effective and lately the control treatment. The selenium treatments had a significant and gradual impact on all the traits of growth performance and productivity, with an increase observed as the Se rate was increased from 0.0 mgL-1 to 5.0 mgL-1, followed by a significant and gradual decrease until the selenium concentration reached 10.0 mgL-1. Notably, the values obtained under the control treatment were superior to those observed under the Se4 treatment (10.0 mgL-1), indicating that excessive selenium application may have a negative effect on the traits. Generally, the combination of T3 and Se2 treatments resulted in the most favorable growth performance and productivity for faba bean cultivation under saline soil conditions.Finally, it is recommended that farmers dealing with salt-affected soil use a combination of gypsum and compost to improve soil quality and plant growth. Additionally, when adding selenium to the plant, it is crucial to consider the dose and avoid excessive application, as this may have a negative impact on plant growth, especially under salt-affected conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control soil amendment had maximum MDA in both seasons.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
control treatmente0
Outcome
MDAe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
9.51 and 9.61e0
Qualifier
both studied seasonse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum values of both MDA and proline (9.51 and 9.61 for MDA and 6.64 and 6.71 for proline in both studied seasons, respectively) were achieved under control treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1119 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–18 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control soil amendment had maximum proline in both seasons.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
control treatmente0
Outcome
prolinee0
Direction
maximume0
Value
6.64 and 6.71e0
Qualifier
both studied seasonse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum values of both MDA and proline (9.51 and 9.61 for MDA and 6.64 and 6.71 for proline in both studied seasons, respectively) were achieved under control treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1119 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–18 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gypsum plus compost had the lowest MDA in both seasons.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
gypsum+ composte0
Outcome
MDAe0
Direction
loweste0
Value
4.99 and 5.05e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lowest one (4.99 and 5.05 for MDA and 3.84 and 3.89 for proline in the 1st and 2nd seasons, respectively) were realized under the combined treatment (gypsum+ compost).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1297 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–18 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gypsum plus compost had the lowest proline in both seasons.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
gypsum+ composte0
Outcome
prolinee0
Direction
loweste0
Value
3.84 and 3.89e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lowest one (4.99 and 5.05 for MDA and 3.84 and 3.89 for proline in the 1st and 2nd seasons, respectively) were realized under the combined treatment (gypsum+ compost).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1297 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–18 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selenium at 10.0 Se mg L-1 yielded maximum MDA.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
plants sprayed with 10.0 Se mg L-1e0
Outcome
MDAe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
7.61 and 7.7e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the maximum values of both MDA and proline (7.61 and 7.7 for MDA and 5.71 and 5.79 for proline in both studied seasons, respectively) were achieved with plants sprayed with 10.0 Se mg L-1 followed by the control treatment (grown without Se)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1334–1574 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–18 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selenium at 10.0 Se mg L-1 yielded maximum proline.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
plants sprayed with 10.0 Se mg L-1e0
Outcome
prolinee0
Direction
maximume0
Value
5.71 and 5.79e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the maximum values of both MDA and proline (7.61 and 7.7 for MDA and 5.71 and 5.79 for proline in both studied seasons, respectively) were achieved with plants sprayed with 10.0 Se mg L-1 followed by the control treatment (grown without Se)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1334–1574 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–18 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selenium at 5.0 Se mg L-1 yielded the lowest MDA.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
plants sprayed with 5.0 Se mg L-1e0
Outcome
MDAe0
Direction
loweste0
Value
6.35 and6.44e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lowest one (6.35 and6.44 for MDA and 4.95 and 5.01 for proline in both seasons, respectively) were realized with plants sprayed with 5.0 Se mg L-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1582–1733 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–18 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selenium at 5.0 Se mg L-1 yielded the lowest proline.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
plants sprayed with 5.0 Se mg L-1e0
Outcome
prolinee0
Direction
loweste0
Value
4.95 and 5.01e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lowest one (6.35 and6.44 for MDA and 4.95 and 5.01 for proline in both seasons, respectively) were realized with plants sprayed with 5.0 Se mg L-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1582–1733 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–18 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gypsum plus compost ranked highest for growth and productivity, ahead of compost, gypsum and control.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
combined treatment of gypsum and composte0
Outcome
growth performance and productivitye0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
treatment of compost alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the combined treatment of gypsum and compost was the most effective in achieving the highest values for all traits of growth performance and productivity, followed by the treatment of compost alone then gypsum alone which was less effective and lately the control treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1753–2027 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–18 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth and productivity rose as selenium increased to 5.0 mgL-1.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
Se rate was increased from 0.0 mgL-1 to 5.0 mgL-1e0
Outcome
growth performance and productivitye0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all the traits of growth performance and productivity, with an increase observed as the Se rate was increased from 0.0 mgL-1 to 5.0 mgL-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2092–2229 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–18 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth and productivity declined as selenium increased to 10.0 mgL-1.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
selenium concentration reached 10.0 mgL-1e0
Outcome
growth performance and productivitye1
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“followed by a significant and gradual decrease until the selenium concentration reached 10.0 mgL-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2231–2329 · show in text ↑
e1

“all the traits of growth performance and productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2092–2145 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–18 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control outperformed the highest selenium dose for growth and productivity.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
Se4 treatment (10.0 mgL-1)e0
Outcome
growth performance and productivitye1
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the values obtained under the control treatment were superior to those observed under the Se4 treatment (10.0 mgL-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2340–2456 · show in text ↑
e1

“all the traits of growth performance and productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2092–2145 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–18 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined gypsum, compost and 5.0 selenium gave the most favorable growth and productivity.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
combination of T3 and Se2 treatmentse0
Outcome
growth performance and productivitye0
Direction
most favorablee0
Setting
saline soil conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the combination of T3 and Se2 treatments resulted in the most favorable growth performance and productivity for faba bean cultivation under saline soil conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2558–2720 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors recommend gypsum and compost for salt affected soil.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Outcome
use a combination of gypsum and composte0
Setting
salt-affected soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it is recommended that farmers dealing with salt-affected soil use a combination of gypsum and compost to improve soil quality and plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2730–2873 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–18 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors recommend avoiding excessive selenium application under salt affected conditions.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
seleniume0
Outcome
avoid excessive applicatione0
Setting
salt-affected conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“when adding selenium to the plant, it is crucial to consider the dose and avoid excessive application, as this may have a negative impact on plant growth, especially under salt-affected conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2889–3085 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–18 · show in text ↑

selenium atom · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results differ

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

selenium atom · physiology: oxidative · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

selenium atom · physiology: osmolytes · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

fertilization · physiology: osmolytes · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

application · physiology: oxidative · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

lime · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 13 positive, 1 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

fertilization · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

176 papers: 159 positive, 17 negative or no effect

158 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

172 papers more in this group

See all 176 papers →

lime · physiology: oxidative · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.