Abstract
A field investigation was conducted at Agronomy research farm A. S. (P.G) College, Lakhaoti, Bulandshahr during rabi seasons of 2006 and 2007. The treatments consisted of combination of four cropping systems viz. chickpea sole (M1), linseed sole (M2), chickpea+ linseed 2:1 ratio (M3) and pigeonpea + linseed 4:2 ratio (M4) in main plots; two irrigations viz. two irrigations at vegetative stages (30-40 days) and flowering stage (70-75 days) (S1) and one irrigation at flowering stage (70-75 days) (S2) in sub plots and three levels of phosphorous viz. control (L1), 30 kg P2O5/ha (L2) and 60 kg P2O5/ha (L3) in sub-sub plots in split plots design replicated thrice during the rabi season. The chickpea variety BG-362 and linseed variety neelam were used in the cropping systems during rabi season. The soil of the experimental site was low in organic carbon (0.47 and 0.48 kg/ha) and total nitrogen (154.0 and 155.1 kg/ha). It was low in available phosphorus (9.2 and 9.24 kg/ha) and medium in available potassium (203.0 and 203.6 kg/ha) and sandy loam in texture having alkaline reaction (pH 7.5). The weather during the both years of the experiment was by and large normal and devoid of any extreme conditions. The net return was found to be maximum under chickpea: linseed in 4:2 row ratio with two irrigations and 60 kg P2O5/ha. (Rs. 21,632 and Rs. 22,128) followed by sole chickpea with two irrigation and 60 kg P2O5/ha. Due to relatively higher gross return. The maximum B:C ratio of 1.87 and 1.91 was obtained from chickpea: linseed in 4:2 with one irrigation at flowering and 60 kg P2O5/ha, because of reduced cost of on irrigation and higher gross return of the system.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 3
Claim · model-written summary
Net return was maximum (Rs. 21,632 and Rs. 22,128) under chickpea:linseed in 4:2 row ratio with two irrigations and 60 kg P2O5/ha.
- Taxon
- linseede0
- Treatment
- chickpea: linseed in 4:2 row ratio with two irrigations and 60 kg P2O5/hae0
- Outcome
- net returne0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- Rs. 21,632 and Rs. 22,128e0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“The net return was found to be maximum under chickpea: linseed in 4:2 row ratio with two irrigations and 60 kg P2O5/ha. (Rs. 21,632 and Rs. 22,128)”
Claim · model-written summary
Net return was next highest under sole chickpea with two irrigations and 60 kg P2O5/ha, following the chickpea:linseed 4:2 system.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinume0 - Treatment
- sole chickpea with two irrigation and 60 kg P2O5/hae0
- Outcome
- net returne0
- Direction
- followed bye0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The net return was found to be maximum under chickpea: linseed in 4:2 row ratio with two irrigations and 60 kg P2O5/ha. (Rs. 21,632 and Rs. 22,128) followed by sole chickpea with two irrigation and 60 kg P2O5/ha”
Claim · model-written summary
The maximum B:C ratio (1.87 and 1.91) was obtained from chickpea:linseed in 4:2 with one irrigation at flowering and 60 kg P2O5/ha.
- Taxon
- linseede0
- Treatment
- chickpea: linseed in 4:2 with one irrigation at flowering and 60 kg P2O5/hae0
- Outcome
- B:C ratioe0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 1.87 and 1.91e0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“The maximum B:C ratio of 1.87 and 1.91 was obtained from chickpea: linseed in 4:2 with one irrigation at flowering and 60 kg P2O5/ha”
The same questions in other papers
Cicer arietinum · yield · Linum usitatissimum (flax)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
stage · yield · Linum usitatissimum (flax)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- no effect
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →phosphorus · yield · Linum usitatissimum (flax)Positive and negative results
26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
24 papers more in this group
See all 28 papers →irrigation · yield · Linum usitatissimum (flax)Positive and negative results
24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
24 papers more in this group
See all 28 papers →irrigation · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
112 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
120 papers more in this group
See all 124 papers →phosphorus · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
160 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
164 papers more in this group
See all 168 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.