Paper · 2023 · The Journal of Agricultural Science

Biofortification of maize growth, productivity and quality using nano-silver, silicon and zinc particles with different irrigation intervals

Essam E. Kandil; Sobhi F. Lamlom; El-Sayed M.S. Gheith; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
20
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Abstract The current study aimed to investigate biofortification of maize grown under different irrigation intervals, i.e. 15, 20 and 25 days (hereinafter referred to as IR15, IR20 and IR25, respectively), using foliar application treatments (silicon (Si), zinc (Zn), silver nanoparticles (AgNPs), Si + Zn, Si + AgNPs, Zn + AgNPs and Si + Zn + AgNPs) in two growing seasons, 2020 and 2021. A split-plot design with four replications was used, where irrigation intervals and foliar treatments were assigned in main plots and subplots, respectively. IR15 received a total of 7925 m 3 /ha irrigation water divided over seven irrigations, while IR20 received 5690 m 3 /ha divided over five irrigations and IR25 received 4564 m 3 /ha divided over four irrigations. The highest yield and grain quality were observed in plants irrigated at 15-day intervals. Spraying the canopy with Si, Zn and AgNPs, either individually or in combination, reduced the negative impact of water stress caused by longer irrigation intervals on plant growth, yield, yield components and grain protein content. In IR15 + AgNPs + Zn, most of the studied parameters, except for proline content, showed a high positive impact, especially on 100-kernel weight (KW). In contrast, IR25 + Si + AgNPs + Zn showed the highest positive effects on proline and protein contents but a negative impact on the harvest index. Collectively, IR15 + Si + AgNPs + Zn resulted in the highest values of all studied parameters, followed by IR15 + Si + AgNPs and IR15 + Si + Zn. In conclusion, our results suggest that an irrigation interval of 15 days combined with application of Si, Zn and AgNPs has the potential to improve yield and quality of maize under water deficit stress.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fifteen-day irrigation produced the highest yield and grain quality.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
15-day intervalse0
Outcome
yield and grain qualitye0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest yield and grain quality were observed in plants irrigated at 15-day intervals.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–850 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Si spray reduced the water-stress penalty on growth, yield, yield components and grain protein.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Sie0
Outcome
negative impact of water stresse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spraying the canopy with Si, Zn and AgNPs, either individually or in combination, reduced the negative impact of water stress caused by longer irrigation intervals on plant growth, yield, yield components and grain protein content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–1082 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn spray reduced the water-stress penalty on maize traits.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Zne0
Outcome
negative impact of water stresse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spraying the canopy with Si, Zn and AgNPs, either individually or in combination, reduced the negative impact of water stress caused by longer irrigation intervals on plant growth, yield, yield components and grain protein content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–1082 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AgNP spray reduced the water-stress penalty on maize traits.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
AgNPse0
Outcome
negative impact of water stresse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spraying the canopy with Si, Zn and AgNPs, either individually or in combination, reduced the negative impact of water stress caused by longer irrigation intervals on plant growth, yield, yield components and grain protein content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–1082 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IR15 with AgNPs and Zn benefited most measured parameters, especially kernel weight, except proline.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
IR15 + AgNPs + Zne0
Outcome
100-kernel weighte0
Direction
high positive impacte0
Qualifier
except for proline contente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In IR15 + AgNPs + Zn, most of the studied parameters, except for proline content, showed a high positive impact, especially on 100-kernel weight (KW).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1083–1233 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IR25 with Si, AgNPs and Zn increased proline and protein content.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
IR25 + Si + AgNPs + Zne0
Outcome
proline and protein contentse0
Direction
highest positive effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“IR25 + Si + AgNPs + Zn showed the highest positive effects on proline and protein contents but a negative impact on the harvest index.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1381 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IR25 with Si, AgNPs and Zn reduced the harvest index.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
IR25 + Si + AgNPs + Zne0
Outcome
harvest indexe0
Direction
negative impacte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“IR25 + Si + AgNPs + Zn showed the highest positive effects on proline and protein contents but a negative impact on the harvest index.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1381 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IR15 with Si, AgNPs and Zn gave the highest values across studied parameters.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
IR15 + Si + AgNPs + Zne0
Outcome
all studied parameterse0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
IR15 + Si + AgNPs and IR15 + Si + Zne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“IR15 + Si + AgNPs + Zn resulted in the highest values of all studied parameters, followed by IR15 + Si + AgNPs and IR15 + Si + Zn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1396–1526 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–32 · show in text ↑

silicon atom · physiology: osmolytes · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

441 papers: 391 positive, 50 negative or no effect

390 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

437 papers more in this group

See all 441 papers →

zinc atom · physiology: osmolytes · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

silicon atom · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

49 papers: 47 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

silver nanoparticle · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.