Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Under foliar zinc at 200 mg.L−1, maize proline was 5.15 mg.g−1 dw.

A claim from Effect of Spraying with Zinc and Ascorbic Acid on some Antioxidants of Maize (Zea mays L.) Affected by Heat Shock · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under foliar zinc at 200 mg.L−1, maize proline was 5.15 mg.g−1 dw.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse3
Treatment
foliar spraying with zince3
Outcome
prolinee2
Direction
higherinferrede2
Value
5.15e2
Qualifier
200 mg.L −1e1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The results showed a superiority concentration of 200 mg.L −1 for each of zinc and ascorbic acid in all studied traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 448–566
e2

“Which record in proline 5.15 and 5.23 mg.g −1 dw, catalase 49.74 and 49.51 U.min.g −1 fw., and peroxidase 52.16 and 51.74 U.min.g −1 fw respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 568–716
e3

“to investigate the effect of foliar spraying with zinc and ascorbic acid on some antioxidants of maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 94–196

Title

Effect of Spraying with Zinc and Ascorbic Acid on some Antioxidants of Maize (Zea mays L.) Affected by Heat Shock

Aiymen A. A. Al-Abassi; Nagham S. Abrahium; Hussein A. Mohammed IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science 2023. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/1225/1/012073

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-de33f63cf25d6abe1ae0f933d277a2e89b46588c5024e89d7b25a3cd2458030a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

zinc atom · physiology: osmolytes · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
See all 6 papers →

application · physiology: osmolytes · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 24 positive, 2 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.