Abstract
To combat with the adverse effect of Zn deficiency, a field experiment was carried out at instructional-cum-research farm of Assam Agricultural University, Jorhat, Assam during 2020–22 with 10 different treatments with both soil- and foliar-applied zinc laid on RBD. Result revealed substantial improvement in cob yield and quality of maize due to supplementation of both soil and foliar zinc. The addition of Zn @ 2.5 kg ha−1 and 0.5% foliar Zn at critical stages substantially increased 47.35% higher cob yield than without Zn supplementation. The combined application significantly increased the nutrient content and uptake and registered 35.42 and 110.61% more Zn content over control and substantially its uptake by grain. Considerable improvement in quality of maize was also noted due to the addition of Zn @ 2.5 kg ha−1 and 0.5% foliar-applied Zn. The supplementation of both soil- and foliar-applied zinc also optimized the crude as well as soluble protein of grain than without Zn besides improving the post-harvest nutrients of soil, PFP of N, P, and K including zinc mobilization efficiency index. The foliar-applied Zn was more effective in enhancing ZUE as compared to soil and their combined application. Comprehensively, the supplementation of both Zn @ 2.5 kg ha−1 and 0.5% foliar-applied Zn is found to be economically profitable over all other doses. The nutrient uptake by plants showed a positive impact in improving yield and quality of maize and each one increase uptake in N, P, K, Zn showed an increase in cob yield by 0.145, 1.029, 0.456, and 0.111, respectively. Similarly, N and Zn content in grain showed strong relationship for enhancing protein content of maize. Hence, the combined application of Zn @ 2.5 kg ha−1 and 0.5% foliar-applied Zn at critical stages may be recommended in Zinc-deficient acidic soil of India.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 13
Claim · model-written summary
Zn at 2.5 kg/ha with 0.5% foliar Zn at critical stages increased maize cob yield by 47.35% over no Zn.
- Treatment
- Zn @ 2.5 kg ha−1 and 0.5% foliar Zn at critical stagese1
- Outcome
- cob yielde1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Value
- 47.35%e1
- Comparator
- without Zn supplementatione1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“productivity and quality of maize”
e1“The addition of Zn @ 2.5 kg ha−1 and 0.5% foliar Zn at critical stages substantially increased 47.35% higher cob yield than without Zn supplementation”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined soil and foliar zinc increased grain Zn content by 35.42% over control.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“productivity and quality of maize”
e2“The combined application significantly increased the nutrient content and uptake and registered 35.42 and 110.61% more Zn content over control and substantially its uptake by grain”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined soil and foliar zinc increased Zn uptake by grain by 110.61%.
- Treatment
- combined applicatione2
- Outcome
- uptake by graine2
- Direction
- increasede2
- Value
- 110.61%e2
- Comparator
- controle2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“productivity and quality of maize”
e2“The combined application significantly increased the nutrient content and uptake and registered 35.42 and 110.61% more Zn content over control and substantially its uptake by grain”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil and foliar zinc optimized crude and soluble protein of maize grain compared with no Zn.
- Treatment
- supplementation of both soil- and foliar-applied zince3
- Outcome
- crude as well as soluble protein of graine3
- Direction
- optimizede3
- Comparator
- without Zne3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“productivity and quality of maize”
e3“The supplementation of both soil- and foliar-applied zinc also optimized the crude as well as soluble protein of grain than without Zn”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil and foliar zinc improved post-harvest soil nutrients.
- Treatment
- supplementation of both soil- and foliar-applied zince3
- Outcome
- post-harvest nutrients of soile4
- Direction
- improvinge4
- Comparator
- without Zne3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“productivity and quality of maize”
e3“The supplementation of both soil- and foliar-applied zinc also optimized the crude as well as soluble protein of grain than without Zn”
e4“besides improving the post-harvest nutrients of soil, PFP of N, P, and K including zinc mobilization efficiency index”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar-applied Zn was more effective than soil or combined application in enhancing zinc use efficiency (ZUE) of maize.
- Treatment
- foliar-applied Zne5
- Outcome
- ZUEe5
- Direction
- more effectivee5
- Comparator
- soil and their combined applicatione5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“productivity and quality of maize”
e5“The foliar-applied Zn was more effective in enhancing ZUE as compared to soil and their combined application”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil and foliar zinc at 2.5 kg/ha plus 0.5% foliar Zn was economically profitable over all other doses.
- Treatment
- supplementation of both Zn @ 2.5 kg ha−1 and 0.5% foliar-applied Zne6
- Outcome
- economically profitablee6
- Comparator
- all other dosese6
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“productivity and quality of maize”
e6“Comprehensively, the supplementation of both Zn @ 2.5 kg ha−1 and 0.5% foliar-applied Zn is found to be economically profitable over all other doses”
Claim · model-written summary
Each unit increase in N uptake increased maize cob yield by 0.145.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“productivity and quality of maize”
e7“each one increase uptake in N, P, K, Zn showed an increase in cob yield by 0.145, 1.029, 0.456, and 0.111, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Each unit increase in P uptake increased maize cob yield by 1.029.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“productivity and quality of maize”
e7“each one increase uptake in N, P, K, Zn showed an increase in cob yield by 0.145, 1.029, 0.456, and 0.111, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Each unit increase in K uptake increased maize cob yield by 0.456.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“productivity and quality of maize”
e7“each one increase uptake in N, P, K, Zn showed an increase in cob yield by 0.145, 1.029, 0.456, and 0.111, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Each unit increase in Zn uptake increased maize cob yield by 0.111.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“productivity and quality of maize”
e7“each one increase uptake in N, P, K, Zn showed an increase in cob yield by 0.145, 1.029, 0.456, and 0.111, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Grain N and Zn content showed a strong relationship with maize grain protein content.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“productivity and quality of maize”
e0“N and Zn content in grain showed strong relationship for enhancing protein content of maize”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined soil and foliar zinc at critical stages may be recommended for zinc-deficient acidic soil in India.
- Outcome
- combined application of Zne7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“productivity and quality of maize”
e7“the combined application of Zn @ 2.5 kg ha−1 and 0.5% foliar-applied Zn at critical stages may be recommended in Zinc-deficient acidic soil of India”
The same questions in other papers
zinc atom · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Results differ
198 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- positive
231 papers more in this group
See all 235 papers →zinc atom · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ
390 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- positive
437 papers more in this group
See all 441 papers →zinc atom · physiology: osmolytes · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →application · physiology: osmolytes · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
22 papers more in this group
See all 26 papers →application · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
150 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- no effect
157 papers more in this group
See all 161 papers →application · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
574 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction · 12 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
625 papers more in this group
See all 629 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.