Paper · 2025 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Combined application of soil and foliar application of zinc enhanced the productivity and quality of maize grown in acidic inceptisols

Gayatri Goswami Kandali; Anjali Basumatary; Samiron Dutta; et al.

13
claims
27
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

To combat with the adverse effect of Zn deficiency, a field experiment was carried out at instructional-cum-research farm of Assam Agricultural University, Jorhat, Assam during 2020–22 with 10 different treatments with both soil- and foliar-applied zinc laid on RBD. Result revealed substantial improvement in cob yield and quality of maize due to supplementation of both soil and foliar zinc. The addition of Zn @ 2.5 kg ha−1 and 0.5% foliar Zn at critical stages substantially increased 47.35% higher cob yield than without Zn supplementation. The combined application significantly increased the nutrient content and uptake and registered 35.42 and 110.61% more Zn content over control and substantially its uptake by grain. Considerable improvement in quality of maize was also noted due to the addition of Zn @ 2.5 kg ha−1 and 0.5% foliar-applied Zn. The supplementation of both soil- and foliar-applied zinc also optimized the crude as well as soluble protein of grain than without Zn besides improving the post-harvest nutrients of soil, PFP of N, P, and K including zinc mobilization efficiency index. The foliar-applied Zn was more effective in enhancing ZUE as compared to soil and their combined application. Comprehensively, the supplementation of both Zn @ 2.5 kg ha−1 and 0.5% foliar-applied Zn is found to be economically profitable over all other doses. The nutrient uptake by plants showed a positive impact in improving yield and quality of maize and each one increase uptake in N, P, K, Zn showed an increase in cob yield by 0.145, 1.029, 0.456, and 0.111, respectively. Similarly, N and Zn content in grain showed strong relationship for enhancing protein content of maize. Hence, the combined application of Zn @ 2.5 kg ha−1 and 0.5% foliar-applied Zn at critical stages may be recommended in Zinc-deficient acidic soil of India.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn at 2.5 kg/ha with 0.5% foliar Zn at critical stages increased maize cob yield by 47.35% over no Zn.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Zn @ 2.5 kg ha−1 and 0.5% foliar Zn at critical stagese1
Outcome
cob yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Value
47.35%e1
Comparator
without Zn supplementatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“productivity and quality of maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–106 · show in text ↑
e1

“The addition of Zn @ 2.5 kg ha−1 and 0.5% foliar Zn at critical stages substantially increased 47.35% higher cob yield than without Zn supplementation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 394–544 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined soil and foliar zinc increased grain Zn content by 35.42% over control.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
combined applicatione2
Outcome
Zn contente2
Direction
moree2
Value
35.42e2
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“productivity and quality of maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–106 · show in text ↑
e2

“The combined application significantly increased the nutrient content and uptake and registered 35.42 and 110.61% more Zn content over control and substantially its uptake by grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 546–726 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined soil and foliar zinc increased Zn uptake by grain by 110.61%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
combined applicatione2
Outcome
uptake by graine2
Direction
increasede2
Value
110.61%e2
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“productivity and quality of maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–106 · show in text ↑
e2

“The combined application significantly increased the nutrient content and uptake and registered 35.42 and 110.61% more Zn content over control and substantially its uptake by grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 546–726 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil and foliar zinc optimized crude and soluble protein of maize grain compared with no Zn.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
supplementation of both soil- and foliar-applied zince3
Outcome
crude as well as soluble protein of graine3
Direction
optimizede3
Comparator
without Zne3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“productivity and quality of maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–106 · show in text ↑
e3

“The supplementation of both soil- and foliar-applied zinc also optimized the crude as well as soluble protein of grain than without Zn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–990 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil and foliar zinc improved post-harvest soil nutrients.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
supplementation of both soil- and foliar-applied zince3
Outcome
post-harvest nutrients of soile4
Direction
improvinge4
Comparator
without Zne3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“productivity and quality of maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–106 · show in text ↑
e3

“The supplementation of both soil- and foliar-applied zinc also optimized the crude as well as soluble protein of grain than without Zn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–990 · show in text ↑
e4

“besides improving the post-harvest nutrients of soil, PFP of N, P, and K including zinc mobilization efficiency index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar-applied Zn was more effective than soil or combined application in enhancing zinc use efficiency (ZUE) of maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
foliar-applied Zne5
Outcome
ZUEe5
Direction
more effectivee5
Comparator
soil and their combined applicatione5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“productivity and quality of maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–106 · show in text ↑
e5

“The foliar-applied Zn was more effective in enhancing ZUE as compared to soil and their combined application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1218 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil and foliar zinc at 2.5 kg/ha plus 0.5% foliar Zn was economically profitable over all other doses.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
supplementation of both Zn @ 2.5 kg ha−1 and 0.5% foliar-applied Zne6
Outcome
economically profitablee6
Comparator
all other dosese6

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“productivity and quality of maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–106 · show in text ↑
e6

“Comprehensively, the supplementation of both Zn @ 2.5 kg ha−1 and 0.5% foliar-applied Zn is found to be economically profitable over all other doses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1368 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Each unit increase in N uptake increased maize cob yield by 0.145.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Compound
Ne7
Outcome
cob yielde7
Direction
increasee7
Value
0.145e7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“productivity and quality of maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–106 · show in text ↑
e7

“each one increase uptake in N, P, K, Zn showed an increase in cob yield by 0.145, 1.029, 0.456, and 0.111, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1469–1588 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Each unit increase in P uptake increased maize cob yield by 1.029.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Compound
Pe7
Outcome
cob yielde7
Direction
increasee7
Value
1.029e7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“productivity and quality of maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–106 · show in text ↑
e7

“each one increase uptake in N, P, K, Zn showed an increase in cob yield by 0.145, 1.029, 0.456, and 0.111, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1469–1588 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Each unit increase in K uptake increased maize cob yield by 0.456.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Compound
Ke7
Outcome
cob yielde7
Direction
increasee7
Value
0.456e7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“productivity and quality of maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–106 · show in text ↑
e7

“each one increase uptake in N, P, K, Zn showed an increase in cob yield by 0.145, 1.029, 0.456, and 0.111, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1469–1588 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Each unit increase in Zn uptake increased maize cob yield by 0.111.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Compound
Zne7
Outcome
cob yielde7
Direction
increasee7
Value
0.111e7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“productivity and quality of maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–106 · show in text ↑
e7

“each one increase uptake in N, P, K, Zn showed an increase in cob yield by 0.145, 1.029, 0.456, and 0.111, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1469–1588 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain N and Zn content showed a strong relationship with maize grain protein content.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Compound
N and Zne0
Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
enhancinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“productivity and quality of maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“N and Zn content in grain showed strong relationship for enhancing protein content of maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1601–1692 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Combined soil and foliar zinc at critical stages may be recommended for zinc-deficient acidic soil in India.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
combined application of Zne7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“productivity and quality of maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–106 · show in text ↑
e7

“the combined application of Zn @ 2.5 kg ha−1 and 0.5% foliar-applied Zn at critical stages may be recommended in Zinc-deficient acidic soil of India”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1701–1849 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

235 papers: 199 positive, 36 negative or no effect

198 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
    Zinc withdrawal reduced tissue zinc.

    Zinc Deficiency and Anther Development in Maize · 1987

    Same directionCited by this paperAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

  3. positive

231 papers more in this group

See all 235 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

441 papers: 391 positive, 50 negative or no effect

390 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

437 papers more in this group

See all 441 papers →

zinc atom · physiology: osmolytes · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

application · physiology: osmolytes · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 24 positive, 2 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

161 papers: 151 positive, 10 negative or no effect

150 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

157 papers more in this group

See all 161 papers →

application · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

629 papers: 575 positive, 54 negative or no effect

574 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction · 12 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

625 papers more in this group

See all 629 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.