Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The authors describe foliar fertilizer as enabling faster zinc absorption than soil application.

A claim from Application of Zn-containing foliar fertilisers for recovery of the grain productivity potential of Zn-deficient maize plants · 2021

Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors describe foliar fertilizer as enabling faster zinc absorption than soil application.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
application of foliar fertiliserse0
Outcome
zinc absorptione0
Direction
much fastere0
Comparator
from the soile0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of foliar fertilisers is extremely suitable as the possibility of much faster zinc absorption than from the soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1395–1524
t0

“maize plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–125

Title

Application of Zn-containing foliar fertilisers for recovery of the grain productivity potential of Zn-deficient maize plants

Krasimir Ivanov; Andon Vassilev; Anyo Mitkov; et al. Italian Journal of Agronomy 2021. doi:10.4081/ija.2021.1759

Other claims from this paper (2)

Record rev-e8c85a627e706e83e2a9764a01eee1b95780bef2084370c2fda5cb61b39aa442 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

application · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

161 papers: 151 positive, 10 negative or no effect

150 papers in the same direction as this claim · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

152 papers more in this group

See all 161 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,164 papers: 1,026 positive, 138 negative or no effect

1,025 papers in the same direction as this claim · 127 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

1,155 papers more in this group

See all 1,164 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.