Paper · 2023 · Journal of Krishi Vigyan

Effect of Rice Stubble and Irrigation Scheduling on Growth and Yield of Wheat Crop

Hrishikesh Nath; Rajan Kumar; Britan Rahman; et al.

7
claims
16
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during the winter Rabi season of 2021 at Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, Pusa, Bihar, in order to study the possibility of improving the growth and yield of wheat under the effect of rice stubble and irrigation scheduling. The experiment was laid out in split-plot design, having 5 main-plot treatment, viz., I1, one irrigation at crown-root-initiation(CRI) stage; I2, two irrigation at the CRI +booting stage; I3, two irrigation at the CRI + milk stage; I4, three irrigation at the CRI + late jointing +milk stage; I5, four irrigation at the CRI + maximum tillering + flowering + dough stage and 3 subplot treatment, viz., R1 (rice stubbles cut at a height of 5 cm); R2 (rice stubbles cut at a height of 20 cm) and R3 (rice stubbles cut at a height of 35 cm)with 3 replication. Resulted indicated that, the growth parameters and yield attributes viz., of plant height, number of tillers/mrl, no. of tillers/m2, spike length, number of grains/ear, crop emergence (number of plants/m2), dry matter accumulation (g/m2) and crop growth rate (g/m2/day) were found to be maximum with I5 irrigation level, which was significantly superior to I1, I2, and I3 but statistically at par with I4. 4 irrigations (I5) and rice stubbles cut at a height of 20 cm (R2) resulted in the highest growth and yield-attributing characters. The grain yield and straw yield were increased up to 4 irrigations (I5). Treatment R2 gave the highest grain and straw yields which was at par with R1 treatment. The highest grain and straw yields were recorded with I5R2 treatment combination.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

I5 maximized wheat plant height, tillers and spike length, significantly above I1–I3 and statistically similar to I4.

Treatment
I5 irrigation levele0
Outcome
plant height, number of tillers/mrl, no. of tillers/m2e0
Direction
maximume0
Qualifier
statistically at par with I4e0
Comparator
I1, I2, and I3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant height, number of tillers/mrl, no. of tillers/m2, spike length, number of grains/ear, crop emergence (number of plants/m2), dry matter accumulation (g/m2) and crop growth rate (g/m2/day) were found to be maximum with I5 irrigation level, which was significantly superior to I1, I2, and I3 but statistically at par with I4.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–1238 · show in text ↑
e1

“I5, four irrigation at the CRI + maximum tillering + flowering + dough stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–646 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

I5 maximized wheat grains per ear, emergence and dry matter accumulation.

Treatment
I5 irrigation levele0
Outcome
number of grains/ear, crop emergence (number of plants/m2), dry matter accumulation (g/m2)e0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
I1, I2, and I3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant height, number of tillers/mrl, no. of tillers/m2, spike length, number of grains/ear, crop emergence (number of plants/m2), dry matter accumulation (g/m2) and crop growth rate (g/m2/day) were found to be maximum with I5 irrigation level, which was significantly superior to I1, I2, and I3 but statistically at par with I4.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–1238 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

I5 maximized wheat crop growth rate.

Treatment
I5 irrigation levele0
Outcome
crop growth rate (g/m2/day)e0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
I1, I2, and I3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“crop growth rate (g/m2/day) were found to be maximum with I5 irrigation level, which was significantly superior to I1, I2, and I3 but statistically at par with I4.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1075–1238 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four irrigations with rice stubble cut at 20 cm produced the highest growth and yield attributes.

Treatment
4 irrigations (I5) and rice stubbles cut at a height of 20 cm (R2)e0
Outcome
growth and yield-attributing characterse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“4 irrigations (I5) and rice stubbles cut at a height of 20 cm (R2) resulted in the highest growth and yield-attributing characters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1239–1370 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain and straw yields rose up to four irrigations.

Treatment
4 irrigations (I5)e0
Outcome
grain yield and straw yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The grain yield and straw yield were increased up to 4 irrigations (I5).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1371–1443 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice stubble cut at 20 cm yielded the highest grain and straw yields, statistically similar to R1.

Treatment
rice stubbles cut at a height of 20 cme1
Outcome
grain and straw yieldse0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
at par with R1 treatmente0
Comparator
R1 treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment R2 gave the highest grain and straw yields which was at par with R1 treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1444–1532 · show in text ↑
e1

“R2 (rice stubbles cut at a height of 20 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–765 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

I5R2 combination produced the highest grain and straw yields.

Treatment
I5R2 treatment combinatione0
Outcome
grain and straw yieldse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest grain and straw yields were recorded with I5R2 treatment combination.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1533–1614 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–82 · show in text ↑

Oryza sativa · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

154 papers: 128 positive, 26 negative or no effect

127 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

150 papers more in this group

See all 154 papers →

irrigation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

242 papers: 177 positive, 65 negative or no effect

176 papers in the same direction as this paper · 61 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

238 papers more in this group

See all 242 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.