Abstract
The field investigation was carried out at Department of Agronomy farm, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola during 2019-20. The experiment was laid out in randomized block design with three replications and seven different nitrogen levels treatment with an objective to study the growth and yield of cotton as influenced by various levels of nitrogen under rainfed condition. Treatments consisted of different nutrient management practices including FYM and nitrogen doses viz., Absolute Control (N1), FYM @ 5 t ha-1 (N2), N2 + 30 kg N ha-1 (N3), N2 + 60 kg N ha-1 (N4), N2 + 90 kg N ha-1 (N5), N2 +120 kg N ha-1 (N6) and N2 + 150 kg N ha-1 (N7). Cotton crop was sawn on 29th June 2019 while it was harvested in four pickings. The result revealed that a significant differences in plant height, leaf area, number of sympodial branches and dry matter accumulation and until harvest. Growth attributes viz., plant height and numbers of sympodial branches were maximum in treatment of FYM @ 5 t ha-1+150 kg N ha-1. However, leaf area and dry matter accumulation were maximum with treatment of FYM @ 5 t ha-1+120 kg N ha-1.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Cotton plant height differed significantly among nutrient treatments.
- Taxon
- cotton
Gossypium hirsutume1 - Treatment
- various levels of nitrogene1
- Outcome
- plant heighte0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“significant differences in plant height, leaf area, number of sympodial branches and dry matter accumulation”
e1“growth and yield of cotton as influenced by various levels of nitrogen”
Claim · model-written summary
Cotton leaf area differed significantly among nutrient treatments.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume1
- Treatment
- various levels of nitrogene1
- Outcome
- leaf areae0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“significant differences in plant height, leaf area, number of sympodial branches and dry matter accumulation”
e1“growth and yield of cotton as influenced by various levels of nitrogen”
Claim · model-written summary
Cotton sympodial branch number differed significantly among nutrient treatments.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume1
- Treatment
- various levels of nitrogene1
- Outcome
- number of sympodial branchese0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“significant differences in plant height, leaf area, number of sympodial branches and dry matter accumulation”
e1“growth and yield of cotton as influenced by various levels of nitrogen”
Claim · model-written summary
Cotton dry matter accumulation differed significantly among nutrient treatments.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume1
- Treatment
- various levels of nitrogene1
- Outcome
- dry matter accumulatione0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“significant differences in plant height, leaf area, number of sympodial branches and dry matter accumulation”
e1“growth and yield of cotton as influenced by various levels of nitrogen”
Claim · model-written summary
Cotton plant height was maximal with FYM at 5 t ha-1 plus 150 kg N ha-1.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume1
- Treatment
- FYM @ 5 t ha-1+150 kg N ha-1e0
- Outcome
- plant heighte0
- Direction
- maximume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“plant height and numbers of sympodial branches were maximum in treatment of FYM @ 5 t ha-1+150 kg N ha-1”
e1“growth and yield of cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
Cotton sympodial branch number was maximal with FYM at 5 t ha-1 plus 150 kg N ha-1.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume1
- Treatment
- FYM @ 5 t ha-1+150 kg N ha-1e0
- Outcome
- numbers of sympodial branchese0
- Direction
- maximume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“plant height and numbers of sympodial branches were maximum in treatment of FYM @ 5 t ha-1+150 kg N ha-1”
e1“growth and yield of cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
Cotton leaf area was maximal with FYM at 5 t ha-1 plus 120 kg N ha-1.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume1
- Treatment
- FYM @ 5 t ha-1+120 kg N ha-1e0
- Outcome
- leaf areae0
- Direction
- maximume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“leaf area and dry matter accumulation were maximum with treatment of FYM @ 5 t ha-1+120 kg N ha-1”
e1“growth and yield of cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
Cotton dry matter accumulation was maximal with FYM at 5 t ha-1 plus 120 kg N ha-1.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume1
- Treatment
- FYM @ 5 t ha-1+120 kg N ha-1e0
- Outcome
- dry matter accumulatione0
- Direction
- maximume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“leaf area and dry matter accumulation were maximum with treatment of FYM @ 5 t ha-1+120 kg N ha-1”
e1“growth and yield of cotton”
The same questions in other papers
nitrogen · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
149 papers more in this group
See all 153 papers →fertilization · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
176 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
198 papers more in this group
See all 202 papers →nitrogen · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
285 papers in the same direction as this paper · 53 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- no effect
339 papers more in this group
See all 343 papers →fertilization · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
496 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
546 papers more in this group
See all 550 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.