Paper · 2023 · Agronomy

Biostimulants Improve Yield and Quality in Preharvest without Impinging on the Postharvest Quality of Hass Avocado and Mango Fruit: Evaluation under Organic and Traditional Systems

Mariana Lucia Rojas-Rodríguez; Joaquín Guillermo Ramírez-Gil; Luis Felipe González-Concha; et al.

6
claims
15
verbatim quotes
12
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The fruit agribusiness sector is one of the most dynamic in Colombia. Within this sector, avocado and mango are of great importance, both in terms of area planted and volume exported. Increasing the productivity, quality, and postharvest life of these fruits is a priority, due to the high losses that occur in the preharvest and postharvest stages. One current alternative to achieve this are biostimulants, which have the potential to improve the productivity and quality of fruit. The objective of this work was to evaluate the effect of the preharvest application of two biostimulants on the yield and quality of avocados and mangos. The study was carried out in production systems for cv. Hass avocado (traditional and organic) and cv. Keitt mango (traditional). In each system, two treatments were evaluated: conventional and conventional + biostimulant. Under field conditions, yield and quality variables such as weight, number of fruits, visual appearance, and size were determined. In postharvest, the fruits obtained from preharvest treatments were subjected to two storage conditions (6 and 20 °C) during the ripening process. Postharvest quality variables such as respiration, ethylene rates, weight loss, color index, firmness, total soluble solids, and titratable acidity were evaluated. The results indicated that the use of biostimulants caused a significant increase (p ≤ 0.05) in the yield, number of fruits, and preharvest quality parameters of size and weight, without negatively affecting the postharvest quality of the fruits. The biostimulant increases the total weight of fruits in organic and conventional avocado by ~55 and 25%, respectively, while in mango, this figure increased by ~23%. Hence, biostimulants can be utilized to increase the productivity of fruit trees.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biostimulants raised total fruit weight of organic avocado by about 55%.

Taxon
avocadoPersea americanae0
Treatment
conventional + biostimulante1
Outcome
total weight of fruitse0
Direction
increasese0
Value
~55e0
Comparator
conventionale1
Setting
organice0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Persea americana
Persea americana · TaxonB.navez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The biostimulant increases the total weight of fruits in organic and conventional avocado by ~55 and 25%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1550–1668 · show in text ↑
e1

“two treatments were evaluated: conventional and conventional + biostimulant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–859 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biostimulants raised total fruit weight of conventional avocado by about 25%.

Taxon
avocadoPersea americanae0
Treatment
conventional + biostimulante1
Outcome
total weight of fruitse0
Direction
increasese0
Value
25%e0
Comparator
conventionale1
Setting
conventionale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Persea americana
Persea americana · TaxonB.navez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The biostimulant increases the total weight of fruits in organic and conventional avocado by ~55 and 25%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1550–1668 · show in text ↑
e1

“two treatments were evaluated: conventional and conventional + biostimulant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–859 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biostimulants raised mango total fruit weight by about 23%.

Treatment
conventional + biostimulante2
Outcome
total weight of fruitse1
Direction
increasede0
Value
~23%e0
Comparator
conventionale2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while in mango, this figure increased by ~23%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1670–1716 · show in text ↑
e1

“The biostimulant increases the total weight of fruits in organic and conventional avocado by ~55 and 25%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1550–1668 · show in text ↑
e2

“two treatments were evaluated: conventional and conventional + biostimulant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–859 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biostimulants significantly increased fruit number, size and weight.

Treatment
conventional + biostimulante2
Outcome
number of fruits, and preharvest quality parameters of size and weighte0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
conventionale2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Persea americana
Persea americana · TaxonB.navez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the use of biostimulants caused a significant increase (p ≤ 0.05) in the yield, number of fruits, and preharvest quality parameters of size and weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1330–1480 · show in text ↑
e1

“avocado and mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 90–107 · show in text ↑
e2

“two treatments were evaluated: conventional and conventional + biostimulant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–859 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preharvest biostimulants did not adversely affect postharvest fruit quality.

Treatment
conventional + biostimulante2
Outcome
postharvest quality of the fruitse0
Direction
without negatively affectinge0
Comparator
conventionale2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Persea americana
Persea americana · TaxonB.navez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“without negatively affecting the postharvest quality of the fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1482–1548 · show in text ↑
e1

“avocado and mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 90–107 · show in text ↑
e2

“two treatments were evaluated: conventional and conventional + biostimulant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–859 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude biostimulants can increase fruit-tree productivity.

Outcome
increase the productivity of fruit treese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Persea americana
Persea americana · TaxonB.navez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“biostimulants can be utilized to increase the productivity of fruit trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1724–1797 · show in text ↑
e1

“avocado and mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 90–107 · show in text ↑

other · growth · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

other · quality: general · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

other · growth · Persea americana (avocado)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.