Paper · 2023 · International Journal of Environment and Climate Change

Influence of Nano Zinc Foliar Application on Yield and Economics of Sweet Corn (Zea mays L. saccharata) in Telangana, India

Shreedevi Jinnur; P. Satish; S. A. Hussain; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The Field experiment was conducted at College farm, College of Agriculture, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad during rabi season of 2022 on zinc deficient soils to evaluate the effect of nano zinc on growth, yield and quality of sweet corn. The study included 9 treatments with 3 forms of Zn fertilizer viz., ZnSO4, Zn EDTA and Nano Zn. Results of the study indicated that foliar application of Zn EDTA at 5 g L-1 produced significantly highest yield parameters, cob yield (15.5 t ha-1), fodder yield (20.4 t ha-1), while the highest B:C ratio of 2.11 was associated with basal application of ZnSO4 at 25 kg ha-1. Foliar application of Nano Zinc performed significantly superior over control; however, it was not comparable with the most superior treatment (T9). Hence 100% basal application of Zinc could be recommended in Zn deficient soils of Telangana for higher returns.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar Zn EDTA at 5 g/L gave the significantly highest cob yield (15.5 t/ha) in sweet corn.

Taxon
Sweet Cornt0
Treatment
foliar application of Zn EDTA at 5 g L-1e0
Outcome
cob yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
15.5 t ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Sweet Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“foliar application of Zn EDTA at 5 g L-1 produced significantly highest yield parameters, cob yield (15.5 t ha-1), fodder yield (20.4 t ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 364–505 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar Zn EDTA at 5 g/L gave the significantly highest fodder yield (20.4 t/ha) in sweet corn.

Taxon
Sweet Cornt0
Treatment
foliar application of Zn EDTA at 5 g L-1e0
Outcome
fodder yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
20.4 t ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Sweet Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“foliar application of Zn EDTA at 5 g L-1 produced significantly highest yield parameters, cob yield (15.5 t ha-1), fodder yield (20.4 t ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 364–505 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest benefit-cost ratio of 2.11 was associated with basal application of ZnSO4 at 25 kg/ha.

Taxon
Sweet Cornt0
Treatment
basal application of ZnSO4 at 25 kg ha-1e0
Outcome
B:C ratioe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2.11e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Sweet Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“the highest B:C ratio of 2.11 was associated with basal application of ZnSO4 at 25 kg ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–603 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar application of nano zinc performed significantly superior to the control.

Taxon
Sweet Cornt0
Treatment
Foliar application of Nano Zince0
Outcome
performed significantly superiore0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

t0

“Sweet Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“Foliar application of Nano Zinc performed significantly superior over control; however, it was not comparable with the most superior treatment (T9)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–752 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar application of nano zinc was not comparable with the most superior treatment (T9).

Taxon
Sweet Cornt0
Treatment
Foliar application of Nano Zince0
Outcome
not comparablee0
Direction
not comparablee0
Comparator
the most superior treatment (T9)e0

Verbatim

t0

“Sweet Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“Foliar application of Nano Zinc performed significantly superior over control; however, it was not comparable with the most superior treatment (T9)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–752 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 100% basal application of zinc in Zn-deficient soils of Telangana for higher returns from sweet corn.

Taxon
Sweet Cornt0
Treatment
100% basal application of Zince0
Outcome
higher returnse0
Setting
Telanganae0

Verbatim

t0

“Sweet Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“100% basal application of Zinc could be recommended in Zn deficient soils of Telangana for higher returns”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–865 · show in text ↑

zinc sulfate · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

128 papers: 124 positive, 4 negative or no effect

123 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

124 papers more in this group

See all 128 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

441 papers: 391 positive, 50 negative or no effect

390 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

437 papers more in this group

See all 441 papers →

ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

application · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

629 papers: 575 positive, 54 negative or no effect

574 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction · 12 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

625 papers more in this group

See all 629 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.