Paper · 2023 · Vestnik Altajskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta

EFFECTIVENESS OF APPLYING ECOGROW FERTILIZER WITH ACTIVE SILICON AS A STRAW DESTRUCTOR AND FOLIAR DRESSINGAT TILLERING STAGE IN SPRING WHEAT GROWING

Olga Antonova; Nikolay Akulinin; Evgeniya Komyakova; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The revealed positive patterns of the influence of silicon from silicon-containing preparations on enhancing the mineralization of organic residues and increasing the utilization rates of nutrients from mineral fertilizers allowed setting the goal to study the effectiveness of applying EcoGrow liquid concentrate with active silicon as a destructor of organic residues and foliar dressing at spring wheat tillering stage. Under the conditions of the temperately arid forest-outlier steppe of the Altai Region, against the background of subsurface tillage, the experiment was conducted with the application of organo-mineral fertilizer EcoGrow with silicon in rates of 15 and 20 L ha as a destructor of organic straw and foliar dressing (2 L ha) at tillering stage of the Uralosibirskaya spring wheat variety. This technology contributed to a slight decrease of the content levels of mobile forms of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and sulfur which was associated with their consumption by plants and the formation of a higher yield. Both with a single application and combined with foliar dressing, there was increased degree of flax linen decomposition by 5.74-29.1% with the greatest activity at a rate of 15 L ha + foliar dressing at tillering stage. The EcoGrow fertilizer with silicon in rates of 15 and 20 L ha contributed to increase of productive tillering, and the number of spikelets and grains per ear, respectively, from 14.8 to 15.1-15.3 and from 27.7 to 28.9-32.0 pieces; that ensured yield gain from 2.27 to 2.47-3.03 t ha or increased by 8.8-33.48% with a noticeable advantage of the double application of EcoGrow with Si in a rate of 15 L ha as a destructor and with foliar dressing. Besides, thousand-kernel weight increased, the protein content increased from 16.5 to 16.8-18.0% and gluten content - from 23.1 to 25.0-28.2%. Higher grain quality indices were formed against the background of EcoGrow application in a rate of 20 L ha.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EcoGrow technology slightly decreased soil mobile nutrient contents.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
This technologye0
Outcome
content levels of mobile forms of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and sulfure0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 128–140 · show in text ↑
e0

“This technology contributed to a slight decrease of the content levels of mobile forms of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and sulfur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–942 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EcoGrow increased flax linen decomposition by 5.74-29.1%, greatest at 15 L ha plus foliar dressing.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
single application and combined with foliar dressinge0
Outcome
degree of flax linen decompositione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
5.74-29.1%e0
Qualifier
greatest activity at a rate of 15 L ha + foliar dressing at tillering stagee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 128–140 · show in text ↑
e0

“Both with a single application and combined with foliar dressing, there was increased degree of flax linen decomposition by 5.74-29.1% with the greatest activity at a rate of 15 L ha + foliar dressing at tillering stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1034–1253 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EcoGrow increased productive tillering.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
EcoGrow fertilizer with silicon in rates of 15 and 20 L hae0
Outcome
productive tilleringe0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 128–140 · show in text ↑
e0

“The EcoGrow fertilizer with silicon in rates of 15 and 20 L ha contributed to increase of productive tillering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1255–1365 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EcoGrow increased spikelets per ear from 14.8 to 15.1-15.3.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
EcoGrow fertilizer with silicon in rates of 15 and 20 L hae0
Outcome
number of spikeletse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
15.1-15.3e0
Qualifier
14.8e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 128–140 · show in text ↑
e0

“The EcoGrow fertilizer with silicon in rates of 15 and 20 L ha contributed to increase of productive tillering, and the number of spikelets and grains per ear, respectively, from 14.8 to 15.1-15.3 and from 27.7 to 28.9-32.0 pieces”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1255–1485 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EcoGrow increased grains per ear from 27.7 to 28.9-32.0 pieces.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
EcoGrow fertilizer with silicon in rates of 15 and 20 L hae0
Outcome
grains per eare0
Direction
increasee0
Value
28.9-32.0 piecese0
Qualifier
27.7e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 128–140 · show in text ↑
e0

“The EcoGrow fertilizer with silicon in rates of 15 and 20 L ha contributed to increase of productive tillering, and the number of spikelets and grains per ear, respectively, from 14.8 to 15.1-15.3 and from 27.7 to 28.9-32.0 pieces”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1255–1485 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EcoGrow raised yield from 2.27 to 2.47-3.03 t ha, an 8.8-33.48% gain.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
double application of EcoGrow with Si in a rate of 15 L ha as a destructor and with foliar dressinge0
Outcome
yield gaine0
Direction
increasede0
Value
8.8-33.48%e0
Qualifier
2.27 to 2.47-3.03 t hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 128–140 · show in text ↑
e0

“that ensured yield gain from 2.27 to 2.47-3.03 t ha or increased by 8.8-33.48% with a noticeable advantage of the double application of EcoGrow with Si in a rate of 15 L ha as a destructor and with foliar dressing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1487–1700 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thousand-kernel weight increased.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
thousand-kernel weighte0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 128–140 · show in text ↑
e0

“Besides, thousand-kernel weight increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1702–1743 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Protein content increased from 16.5 to 16.8-18.0%.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
16.8-18.0%e0
Qualifier
16.5e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 128–140 · show in text ↑
e0

“the protein content increased from 16.5 to 16.8-18.0%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1745–1798 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gluten content increased from 23.1 to 25.0-28.2%.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
gluten contente0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
25.0-28.2%e0
Qualifier
23.1e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 128–140 · show in text ↑
e0

“gluten content - from 23.1 to 25.0-28.2%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1803–1843 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EcoGrow at 20 L ha produced higher grain quality indices.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
EcoGrow application in a rate of 20 L hae0
Outcome
grain quality indicese0
Direction
Highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 128–140 · show in text ↑
e0

“Higher grain quality indices were formed against the background of EcoGrow application in a rate of 20 L ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1845–1952 · show in text ↑

silicon atom · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

81 papers: 74 positive, 7 negative or no effect

73 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

77 papers more in this group

See all 81 papers →

silicon atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

90 papers: 85 positive, 5 negative or no effect

84 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

86 papers more in this group

See all 90 papers →

application · organism · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 24 positive, 5 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

fertilization · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

755 papers: 663 positive, 92 negative or no effect

662 papers in the same direction as this paper · 89 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

751 papers more in this group

See all 755 papers →

application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

877 papers: 795 positive, 82 negative or no effect

794 papers in the same direction as this paper · 75 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

873 papers more in this group

See all 877 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.