Paper · 2023 · Al-Qadisiyah Journal For Agriculture Sciences

Response of Mung Bean (Vigna radita L.) to Fungal Inoculation (Glomus mosseae L. ) and Nano Chelating Zn Fertigation

محمد الركابي

3
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Field experiment conducted at winter season 2022-2023 on clay sandy soil in Al-Diwanyia. The experiment was design as CRBD with three replications arranged for split-pilot design, in lest significant differences ( LSD0.05 )the main treatment contend two groups inoculation and non inoculation within there four levels of Nano Zn( 0 , 1 , 2 , 3) g.L-1. I took sample of soil before planting to analysis it and to learn physical and chemical traits. Mung bean were sowing at rate20 kg.ha-1(3cm depth) at 1/9 , after 5 months I took a sample to measure . The results showed all factors and interactions were significant effect and increased all growth traits (plant content of protein , carbohydrates total Chlorophyll and fats,) lead to increased grain yield max values (8.2 Ton.ha-1) at interaction of Glomus mosseae e inoculation and 3 g.L-1 Nano Zn level, while min value(5.81 Ton.ha-1) at interaction no inoculation and 0 g.L-1 Nano Zn level.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Glomus mosseae inoculation significantly increased mung bean growth traits, including protein, carbohydrate, chlorophyll and fat content.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
inoculatione1
Interactor
Glomus mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaet0symbiont
Outcome
growth traitse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
non inoculatione1
Setting
Al-Diwanyiae2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed all factors and interactions were significant effect and increased all growth traits (plant content of protein , carbohydrates total Chlorophyll and fats,)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 552–726 · show in text ↑
e1

“the main treatment contend two groups inoculation and non inoculation within there four levels of Nano Zn( 0 , 1 , 2 , 3) g.L-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–350 · show in text ↑
e2

“Field experiment conducted at winter season 2022-2023 on clay sandy soil in Al-Diwanyia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–87 · show in text ↑
t0

“Response of Mung Bean (Vigna radita L.) to Fungal Inoculation (Glomus mosseae L. ) and Nano Chelating Zn Fertigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glomus mosseae inoculation with 3 g/L nano Zn gave the maximum mung bean grain yield of 8.2 Ton/ha.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
Glomus mosseae e inoculation and 3 g.L-1 Nano Zn levele3
Interactor
Glomus mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaet0symbiont
Outcome
grain yielde3
Direction
increasede3
Value
8.2 Ton.ha-1e3
Comparator
no inoculation and 0 g.L-1 Nano Zn levele4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“lead to increased grain yield max values (8.2 Ton.ha-1) at interaction of Glomus mosseae e inoculation and 3 g.L-1 Nano Zn level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–855 · show in text ↑
e4

“while min value(5.81 Ton.ha-1) at interaction no inoculation and 0 g.L-1 Nano Zn level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–943 · show in text ↑
t0

“Response of Mung Bean (Vigna radita L.) to Fungal Inoculation (Glomus mosseae L. ) and Nano Chelating Zn Fertigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–116 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The minimum mung bean grain yield of 5.81 Ton/ha occurred without inoculation and with 0 g/L nano Zn.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
no inoculation and 0 g.L-1 Nano Zn levele4
Interactor
Glomus mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaet0symbiont
Outcome
grain yielde3
Value
5.81 Ton.ha-1e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“lead to increased grain yield max values (8.2 Ton.ha-1) at interaction of Glomus mosseae e inoculation and 3 g.L-1 Nano Zn level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–855 · show in text ↑
e4

“while min value(5.81 Ton.ha-1) at interaction no inoculation and 0 g.L-1 Nano Zn level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–943 · show in text ↑
t0

“Response of Mung Bean (Vigna radita L.) to Fungal Inoculation (Glomus mosseae L. ) and Nano Chelating Zn Fertigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–116 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results differ

74 papers: 71 positive, 3 negative or no effect

70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

70 papers more in this group

See all 74 papers →

Funneliformis mosseae · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

inoculation · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

184 papers: 179 positive, 5 negative or no effect

178 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

180 papers more in this group

See all 184 papers →

inoculation · Funneliformis mosseae · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

26 papers: 26 positive, 0 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.