Paper · 2023 · Asian Soil Research Journal

Tillage and Crop Residue Effects on Soil Carbon and Moisture for Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Productivity in Semiarid Regions of Tigray, Ethiopia

Hailemariam Abrha; Berhe Abraha

9
claims
22
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Soil tillage is one of the basic agriculture operations. However, the appropriate tillage type, tillage time, and tillage frequency for effective moisture harvesting and sustainable soil fertility were not investigated for Tigray. A field experiment was conducted during 2016 to 2018 in Enderta district. It was done with the objective of evaluating the effect of different tillage practices on wheat productivity. The treatments were (I) permanent bed+ crop residue,(II) three times tillage with furrow, (III) two times tillage with furrow, and (IV) farmer’s practice tillage. A randomized complete block design with three replications was set up. Measurement of soil moisture content was conducted using the gravimetric method. Agronomic parameters were collected and analyzed using GenStat. Marginal rate of return was also estimated from the total revenue and total variable cost. Positive effect was found on soil fertility, soil moisture content, and grain yield due to the tillage practice and crop residue. Permanent bed+ crop residues and three tillage furrow increased soil moisture content, organic carbon, and total nitrogen, as well as the yield and yield components at the second and third year of experimentation. The highest grain yield 2952 kg ha-1 and biomass yield 8582 kg ha-1 were recorded at the three tillage furrow in the third year of experimentation. The 59,056 ETB was the highest net revenue recorded at three times tillage with furrows. From this result, it can be concluded that without adding any additional input instead of changing agricultural operation techniques, the economic benefit of farmers’ could be improved by 48%. Therefore, three tillage practices with furrow is the most economically feasible technology for farmers to increase wheat productivity in the semiarid area of Enderta district.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Permanent bed with crop residues increased soil moisture content, organic carbon and total nitrogen in the second and third year.

Taxon
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Permanent bed+ crop residuese1
Outcome
soil moisture content, organic carbon, and total nitrogene1
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
at the second and third year of experimentatione1
Setting
Enderta districte2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–93 · show in text ↑
e1

“Permanent bed+ crop residues and three tillage furrow increased soil moisture content, organic carbon, and total nitrogen, as well as the yield and yield components at the second and third year of experimentation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1227 · show in text ↑
e2

“A field experiment was conducted during 2016 to 2018 in Enderta district”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 231–303 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three tillage furrow increased soil moisture content, organic carbon and total nitrogen in the second and third year.

Taxon
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
three tillage furrowe1
Outcome
soil moisture content, organic carbon, and total nitrogene1
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
at the second and third year of experimentatione1
Setting
Enderta districte2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–93 · show in text ↑
e1

“Permanent bed+ crop residues and three tillage furrow increased soil moisture content, organic carbon, and total nitrogen, as well as the yield and yield components at the second and third year of experimentation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1227 · show in text ↑
e2

“A field experiment was conducted during 2016 to 2018 in Enderta district”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 231–303 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Permanent bed with crop residues increased yield and yield components in the second and third year.

Taxon
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Permanent bed+ crop residuese1
Outcome
yield and yield componentse1
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
at the second and third year of experimentatione1
Setting
Enderta districte2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–93 · show in text ↑
e1

“Permanent bed+ crop residues and three tillage furrow increased soil moisture content, organic carbon, and total nitrogen, as well as the yield and yield components at the second and third year of experimentation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1227 · show in text ↑
e2

“A field experiment was conducted during 2016 to 2018 in Enderta district”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 231–303 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three tillage furrow increased yield and yield components in the second and third year.

Taxon
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
three tillage furrowe1
Outcome
yield and yield componentse1
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
at the second and third year of experimentatione1
Setting
Enderta districte2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–93 · show in text ↑
e1

“Permanent bed+ crop residues and three tillage furrow increased soil moisture content, organic carbon, and total nitrogen, as well as the yield and yield components at the second and third year of experimentation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1227 · show in text ↑
e2

“A field experiment was conducted during 2016 to 2018 in Enderta district”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 231–303 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield was highest, at 2952 kg ha-1, at the three tillage furrow in the third year.

Taxon
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
three tillage furrowe3
Outcome
grain yielde3
Direction
higheste3
Value
2952 kg ha-1e3
Qualifier
in the third year of experimentatione3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–93 · show in text ↑
e3

“The highest grain yield 2952 kg ha-1 and biomass yield 8582 kg ha-1 were recorded at the three tillage furrow in the third year of experimentation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1229–1375 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biomass yield was highest, at 8582 kg ha-1, at the three tillage furrow in the third year.

Taxon
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
three tillage furrowe3
Outcome
biomass yielde3
Direction
higheste3
Value
8582 kg ha-1e3
Qualifier
in the third year of experimentatione3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–93 · show in text ↑
e3

“The highest grain yield 2952 kg ha-1 and biomass yield 8582 kg ha-1 were recorded at the three tillage furrow in the third year of experimentation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1229–1375 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Net revenue was highest, at 59,056 ETB, at three times tillage with furrows.

Taxon
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
three times tillage with furrowse4
Outcome
net revenuee4
Direction
higheste4
Value
59,056 ETBe4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–93 · show in text ↑
e4

“The 59,056 ETB was the highest net revenue recorded at three times tillage with furrows”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1377–1464 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Changing agricultural operation techniques without extra input could improve farmers economic benefit by 48%.

Taxon
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
changing agricultural operation techniquese5
Outcome
economic benefite5
Direction
improvede5
Value
48%e5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–93 · show in text ↑
e5

“From this result, it can be concluded that without adding any additional input instead of changing agricultural operation techniques, the economic benefit of farmers’ could be improved by 48%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1466–1657 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Three tillage practices with furrow is the most economically feasible technology for farmers to increase wheat productivity in the semiarid area of Enderta district.

Taxon
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Outcome
most economically feasible technology for farmers to increase wheat productivitye6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–93 · show in text ↑
e6

“three tillage practices with furrow is the most economically feasible technology for farmers to increase wheat productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1670–1793 · show in text ↑

irrigation · quality: grain · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

30 papers: 21 positive, 9 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

tillage · quality: grain · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

48 papers: 32 positive, 16 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

organic · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

322 papers: 281 positive, 41 negative or no effect

280 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

318 papers more in this group

See all 322 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

1,115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1,410 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

organic · quality: grain · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.