Paper · 2024 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Integrated use of NPK chemical fertilizers and bio-stimulants improved soil fertility, fruit yield, quality and net returns in pomegranate ( Punica granatum L.)

Ashis Maity; K. Dhinesh Babu; B. B. Basak; et al.

8
claims
25
verbatim quotes
3
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Bio-stimulants are gaining importance for elevating the stagnated yield level resulting from continuous use of chemical fertilizers (CF) in many crops, however, their use in pomegranate have not been fully explored. Two years of field experiments were conducted on a 5-years old pomegranate cv. Bhagwa orchard to investigate the effects of different combinations of commercial bio-stimulant products namely, microbial-based product A containing consortium of Rhizophagus spp. (5 kg ha−1), seaweed extract-based granular formulation D (30 kg ha−1) and liquid formulation B (625 and 1250 ml ha−1) through soil application as well as wettable granular formulation, C (1 and 2 g l−1) and liquid formulation, E (1 ml l−1) through foliar sprays along with chemical fertilizers on soil fertility, trees’ nutrition, fruit yield and quality of pomegranate. Results showed that integrated use of CF and bio-stimulants significantly increased the number of bisexual flowers. However, the combination of microbial-based product A (5 kg ha−1), seaweed extract based liquid formulation B (625 ml ha−1) in soil and foliar spary of seaweed extract based wettable granular formulation C (1–2 g l−1) with CF resulted in production of the highest fruit yield (increased by 41.97–51.61%) with 23.08–33.38% increase in the exportable grade fruit and improved quality attributes viz. ascorbic acid, anthocyanin, non-reducing sugar, protein, and mineral content of fruits through enhancement in soil fertility and trees’ micronutrient status compared to only CF. These doses combinations of bio-stimulants along with CF gave rise to the highest benefit–cost ratio of 2.10–2.34:1 and hence can be recommended for sustainable pomegranate cultivation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated use of chemical fertilizers and bio-stimulants significantly increased the number of bisexual flowers in pomegranate.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatume0
Treatment
integrated use of CF and bio-stimulantse1
Outcome
number of bisexual flowerse1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pomegranate cv. Bhagwa orchard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–309 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results showed that integrated use of CF and bio-stimulants significantly increased the number of bisexual flowers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–962 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The microbial-based product A combined with seaweed extract formulations and CF gave the highest pomegranate fruit yield, increased by 41.97-51.61%.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatume0
Treatment
microbial-based product A (5 kg ha−1)e6
Outcome
fruit yielde2
Direction
increasede2
Value
41.97–51.61%e2
Comparator
only CFe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pomegranate cv. Bhagwa orchard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–309 · show in text ↑
e2

“resulted in production of the highest fruit yield (increased by 41.97–51.61%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1267 · show in text ↑
e6

“the combination of microbial-based product A (5 kg ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1029 · show in text ↑
e3

“compared to only CF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1519–1538 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same combination increased the exportable grade fruit by 23.08-33.38%.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatume0
Treatment
microbial-based product A (5 kg ha−1)e6
Outcome
exportable grade fruite4
Direction
increasee4
Value
23.08–33.38%e4
Comparator
only CFe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pomegranate cv. Bhagwa orchard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–309 · show in text ↑
e6

“the combination of microbial-based product A (5 kg ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1029 · show in text ↑
e3

“compared to only CF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1519–1538 · show in text ↑
e4

“with 23.08–33.38% increase in the exportable grade fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1268–1324 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same combination improved ascorbic acid, anthocyanin and non-reducing sugar content of pomegranate fruit.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatume0
Treatment
microbial-based product A (5 kg ha−1)e6
Outcome
ascorbic acid, anthocyanin, non-reducing sugare5
Direction
improvede5
Comparator
only CFe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pomegranate cv. Bhagwa orchard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–309 · show in text ↑
e6

“the combination of microbial-based product A (5 kg ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1029 · show in text ↑
e3

“compared to only CF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1519–1538 · show in text ↑
e5

“improved quality attributes viz. ascorbic acid, anthocyanin, non-reducing sugar, protein, and mineral content of fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1329–1448 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same combination improved protein and mineral content of pomegranate fruit.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatume0
Treatment
microbial-based product A (5 kg ha−1)e6
Outcome
protein, and mineral contente5
Direction
improvede5
Comparator
only CFe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pomegranate cv. Bhagwa orchard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–309 · show in text ↑
e6

“the combination of microbial-based product A (5 kg ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1029 · show in text ↑
e3

“compared to only CF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1519–1538 · show in text ↑
e5

“improved quality attributes viz. ascorbic acid, anthocyanin, non-reducing sugar, protein, and mineral content of fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1329–1448 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bio-stimulant doses combined with CF gave the highest benefit-cost ratio of 2.10-2.34:1 in pomegranate.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatume0
Treatment
doses combinations of bio-stimulants along with CFe6
Outcome
benefit–cost ratioe6
Direction
higheste6
Value
2.10–2.34:1e6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pomegranate cv. Bhagwa orchard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–309 · show in text ↑
e6

“These doses combinations of bio-stimulants along with CF gave rise to the highest benefit–cost ratio of 2.10–2.34:1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1540–1655 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The quality improvement is explained by enhanced soil fertility and tree micronutrient status.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatume0
Outcome
improved quality attributese5
Qualifier
enhancement in soil fertility and trees’ micronutrient statuse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pomegranate cv. Bhagwa orchard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–309 · show in text ↑
e3

“compared to only CF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1519–1538 · show in text ↑
e5

“improved quality attributes viz. ascorbic acid, anthocyanin, non-reducing sugar, protein, and mineral content of fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1329–1448 · show in text ↑
e7

“through enhancement in soil fertility and trees’ micronutrient status”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1449–1518 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Bio-stimulant combinations with CF can be recommended for sustainable pomegranate cultivation.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatume7
Outcome
sustainable pomegranate cultivatione7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“can be recommended for sustainable pomegranate cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1666–1724 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 38 positive, 2 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

fertilization · phenology · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.