Paper · 2024 · Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and Environment

Influence of native rhizobacteria co‐inoculation and formulation of bacterial inoculants on the growth and yield of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)

Hezekiah Korir; Nancy W. Mungai; Victor W. Wasike

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Incorporation of inoculum in different carrier materials may increase the efficacy of bacterial inocula. Materials and Methods Field experiments were conducted using two strains of rhizobium and phosphate‐solubilizing bacteria (PSB) and their respective combinations using different carrier materials in common bean‐growing regions in three soil types in Kenya. The field experiment was laid out in a split‐plot arrangement with the strain inoculations as the main plot while the subplots consisted of the carrier materials (filter mud, peat moss and yeast extract mannitol broth [YEMB]). Each main plot included two controls: uninoculated negative control and uninoculated controls that received N and P fertilizer. The experiment was conducted for two cropping seasons. Data were collected on the nodulation, shoot and root biomass and yield. Results Co‐inoculation of the common bean with Rhizobium phaseoli + Bacillus aryabhattai strains had significantly higher number of nodules (55 nodules per plant) compared to single R. phaseoli inoculation (38 nodules). The co‐inoculation of the rhizobia and the PSB yielded statistically at par with the application of diammonium phosphate (18:46:0) across the soil types and seasons. The use of filter mud as a carrier material led to a higher number of nodules for most of the rhizobia strains inoculation and their respective co‐inoculation with the bacillus strains. Significantly higher yield was obtained with the filter mud (1.64 Mg ha −1 ) while there was no significant difference in the yield of common bean between peat moss and YEMB as carrier materials for the bacterial strains. Conclusion The solid carrier material, specifically filter mud, showed potential for use in the formulation of inoculants. Specific co‐inoculation of rhizobia ( R. phaseoli and Rhizobium pusense strains) and PSB ( Paenibacillus polymyxa and B. aryabhattai ) increased the growth, nodulation and yield of common bean more efficiently than the control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-inoculation yielded more nodules than Rhizobium phaseoli alone.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
Co‐inoculation of the common bean with Rhizobium phaseoli + Bacillus aryabhattai strainse0
Interactor
Rhizobium phaseoliRhizobium phaseolie0symbiont
Second interactor
Bacillus aryabhattaiPriestia aryabhattaie0symbiont
Outcome
number of nodulese0
Direction
highere0
Value
55 nodules per plante0
Comparator
single R. phaseoli inoculatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Co‐inoculation of the common bean with Rhizobium phaseoli + Bacillus aryabhattai strains had significantly higher number of nodules (55 nodules per plant) compared to single R. phaseoli inoculation (38 nodules).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 875–1086 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobia and PSB co-inoculation yielded comparably to diammonium phosphate across soils and seasons.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
co‐inoculation of the rhizobia and the PSBe0
Interactor
rhizobiae0symbiont
Second interactor
PSBe0symbiont
Outcome
yielded statistically at pare0
Qualifier
across the soil types and seasonse0
Comparator
application of diammonium phosphate (18:46:0)e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The co‐inoculation of the rhizobia and the PSB yielded statistically at par with the application of diammonium phosphate (18:46:0) across the soil types and seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1252 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Filter mud carrier increased nodules for most inoculant combinations.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
filter mud as a carrier materiale0
Outcome
number of nodulese0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
most of the rhizobia strains inoculatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of filter mud as a carrier material led to a higher number of nodules for most of the rhizobia strains inoculation and their respective co‐inoculation with the bacillus strains.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1253–1438 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Filter mud carrier gave a significantly higher bean yield of 1.64 Mg ha −1.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
filter mude0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
1.64 Mg ha −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly higher yield was obtained with the filter mud (1.64 Mg ha −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1439–1515 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bean yield did not significantly differ between peat moss and YEMB carriers.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
peat mosse0
Outcome
yield of common beane0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Comparator
YEMBe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was no significant difference in the yield of common bean between peat moss and YEMB as carrier materials for the bacterial strains.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1522–1660 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobia and PSB co-inoculation improved bean growth, nodulation and yield relative to control.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
Specific co‐inoculation of rhizobiae0
Interactor
R. phaseoliRhizobium phaseolie0symbiont
Second interactor
Paenibacillus polymyxaPaenibacillus polymyxae0symbiont
Outcome
growth, nodulation and yield of common beane0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Paenibacillus polymyxa
Paenibacillus polymyxa · Second interactorDr. W.A. Clark · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Specific co‐inoculation of rhizobia ( R. phaseoli and Rhizobium pusense strains) and PSB ( Paenibacillus polymyxa and B. aryabhattai ) increased the growth, nodulation and yield of common bean more efficiently than the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1784–2011 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–127 · show in text ↑

Rhizobium phaseoli · symbiosis · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

growing medium · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

inoculation · Rhizobium phaseoli · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

inoculation · symbiosis · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

90 papers: 83 positive, 7 negative or no effect

82 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

86 papers more in this group

See all 90 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

118 papers: 96 positive, 22 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 96 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

114 papers more in this group

See all 118 papers →

inoculation · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

195 papers: 153 positive, 42 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 153 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

191 papers more in this group

See all 195 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.