Paper · 2023 · Agritrop (Cirad)

Afforestation of savannah using cocoa agroforestry: :impacts on ecosystem services and effects of associated tree species on soil fertility

Harmand, J-M.; Nijmeijer, A.; Sauvadet, M.; et al.

13
claims
21
verbatim quotes
0
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Past studies showed a gradual expansion of forest over savannah in forest-savannah transition zones in Central Africa. While the natural encroachment of savannah by forest is more and more impeded by human activities, farmers in Cameroon have proven that afforestation of savannah is achievable using cocoa and specific technics to build up an associated tree canopy. Furthermore, mature cocoa agroforestry systems created on savannah (S-cAFS) or in forest (F-cAFS) exhibit comparable multi-strata structures. By combining measurements of cocoa yield, litterfall, soil quality, carbon storage and tree species diversity along an age gradient (1 to 70 years), we showed that those variables in S- and F-cAFS tended to comparable levels after several decades. Results also emphasized the ability of S-cAFS to increase most of the ecosystem services (including soil fertility and plant diversity) although the time needed to reach levels found in F-cAFS varied strongly amongst variables. In addition to the previous study, we compared in a second time the impacts of the presence of shade trees on soil functions and cocoa yield in cocoa farms set up after savannah. To do so, we sampled 5 cocoa monocultures and 8 cAFS. Cocoa yield did not vary between these systems. Nonetheless, the soil P availability was improved in cAFS compared to monocultures. Within cAFS, unshaded cocoa conditions showed the lowest soil functions associated with the low leaf litter quality of cocoa plants. Tree species had contrasting effects on soil functions. Cocoa association with the fruit trees Canarium schweinfurthii and Dacryodes edulis did not improve soil fertility compared with unshaded cocoa, while associations with the legume tree Albizia adianthifolia, or the timber trees Milicia excelsa and Ceiba pentandra significantly improved soil N and P availability. These differences could be explained by the quality of the recycled litter, since low litter recalcitrance was strongly associated with increases in soil N and P availability, while soil pH and soil C contents increased with litter Ca restitution from C. pentandra. Our results highlighted the positive impacts of cAFS establishment in savannah on soil fertility, species diversity and carbon storage in biomass and soil over time. Furthermore, we showed that using specific trees for soil quality and compatible with cocoa, and other trees for the provision of goods, can ensure cocoa AFS multifunctionality and sustainability. Future research will need to understand how plant diversity in these cocoa systems, can help to adapt to climate change. Keywords: Cocoa agroforestry; ecosystem services; forest-savannah transition, litter traits, soil fertility

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Measured cocoa agroforestry variables in savannah and forest systems tended toward comparable levels after several decades.

Outcome
cocoa yield, litterfall, soil quality, carbon storage and tree species diversitye0
Direction
comparablee0
Comparator
F-cAFSe0
Setting
S- and F-cAFSe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“By combining measurements of cocoa yield, litterfall, soil quality, carbon storage and tree species diversity along an age gradient (1 to 70 years), we showed that those variables in S- and F-cAFS tended to comparable levels after several decades.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–757 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Savannah cocoa agroforestry increased most ecosystem services, including soil fertility and plant diversity.

Outcome
soil fertility and plant diversitye0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
time needed to reach levels found in F-cAFS varied strongly amongst variablese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results also emphasized the ability of S-cAFS to increase most of the ecosystem services (including soil fertility and plant diversity) although the time needed to reach levels found in F-cAFS varied strongly amongst variables.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–985 · show in text ↑
t0

“cocoa agroforestry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–50 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cocoa yield did not vary between monoculture and agroforestry systems.

Outcome
Cocoa yielde0
Direction
did not varye0
Comparator
5 cocoa monocultures and 8 cAFSe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cocoa yield did not vary between these systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1219–1266 · show in text ↑
e1

“we sampled 5 cocoa monocultures and 8 cAFS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1175–1218 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil phosphorus availability improved in cocoa agroforestry relative to monoculture.

Outcome
soil P availabilitye0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
monoculturese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nonetheless, the soil P availability was improved in cAFS compared to monocultures.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1267–1350 · show in text ↑
t0

“cocoa agroforestry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–50 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Unshaded cocoa had the lowest soil functions within agroforestry systems.

Outcome
soil functionse0
Direction
loweste0
Setting
unshaded cocoa conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Within cAFS, unshaded cocoa conditions showed the lowest soil functions associated with the low leaf litter quality of cocoa plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1351–1483 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Canarium schweinfurthii association did not improve cocoa soil fertility compared with unshaded cocoa.

Treatment
Canarium schweinfurthiie0
Interactor
Canarium schweinfurthiiCanarium schweinfurthiie0other
Outcome
soil fertilitye0
Direction
did not improvee0
Comparator
unshaded cocoae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Canarium schweinfurthii
Canarium schweinfurthii · InteractorMuhles · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cocoa association with the fruit trees Canarium schweinfurthii and Dacryodes edulis did not improve soil fertility compared with unshaded cocoa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1540–1683 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dacryodes edulis association did not improve cocoa soil fertility compared with unshaded cocoa.

Treatment
Dacryodes edulise0
Interactor
Dacryodes edulisPachylobus edulise0other
Outcome
soil fertilitye0
Direction
did not improvee0
Comparator
unshaded cocoae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pachylobus edulis
Pachylobus edulis · InteractorOwn work · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cocoa association with the fruit trees Canarium schweinfurthii and Dacryodes edulis did not improve soil fertility compared with unshaded cocoa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1540–1683 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Albizia adianthifolia association significantly improved soil nitrogen and phosphorus availability.

Treatment
Albizia adianthifoliae0
Interactor
Albizia adianthifoliaAlbizia adianthifoliae0other
Outcome
soil N and P availabilitye0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Albizia adianthifolia
Albizia adianthifolia · InteractorH Brisse (upload by Abalg) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“associations with the legume tree Albizia adianthifolia, or the timber trees Milicia excelsa and Ceiba pentandra significantly improved soil N and P availability.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1691–1853 · show in text ↑
t0

“cocoa agroforestry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Milicia excelsa association significantly improved soil nitrogen and phosphorus availability.

Treatment
Milicia excelsae0
Interactor
Milicia excelsaMilicia excelsae0other
Outcome
soil N and P availabilitye0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Milicia excelsa
Milicia excelsa · InteractorFenrith · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“associations with the legume tree Albizia adianthifolia, or the timber trees Milicia excelsa and Ceiba pentandra significantly improved soil N and P availability.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1691–1853 · show in text ↑
t0

“cocoa agroforestry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ceiba pentandra association significantly improved soil nitrogen and phosphorus availability.

Treatment
Ceiba pentandrae0
Interactor
Ceiba pentandraCeiba pentandrae0other
Outcome
soil N and P availabilitye0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ceiba pentandra
Ceiba pentandra · InteractorBurkhard Mücke · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“associations with the legume tree Albizia adianthifolia, or the timber trees Milicia excelsa and Ceiba pentandra significantly improved soil N and P availability.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1691–1853 · show in text ↑
t0

“cocoa agroforestry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–50 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower litter recalcitrance was strongly associated with increased soil nitrogen and phosphorus availability.

Organ / stage
littere0
Outcome
soil N and P availabilitye0
Direction
increasese0
Qualifier
low litter recalcitrancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“low litter recalcitrance was strongly associated with increases in soil N and P availability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1936–2028 · show in text ↑
t0

“cocoa agroforestry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–50 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil pH and carbon content increased with litter calcium restitution from C. pentandra.

Interactor
C. pentandraCeiba pentandrae0other
Compound
Cae0
Outcome
soil pH and soil C contentse0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ceiba pentandra
Ceiba pentandra · InteractorBurkhard Mücke · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil pH and soil C contents increased with litter Ca restitution from C. pentandra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2036–2118 · show in text ↑
t0

“cocoa agroforestry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–50 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that specific trees selected for soil quality and goods can support cocoa agroforestry multifunctionality and sustainability.

Outcome
cocoa AFS multifunctionality and sustainabilitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“using specific trees for soil quality and compatible with cocoa, and other trees for the provision of goods, can ensure cocoa AFS multifunctionality and sustainability.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2314–2482 · show in text ↑