Paper · 2024 · International Journal of Advanced Biochemistry Research

Biology and management of fall army worm, Spodoptera frugiperda in maize crop at Karbi Anglong district of Assam

Manha Bathari; Bikash Hazarika; H Teragpi; et al.

8
claims
22
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The present investigation was carried out at AAU-Zonal Research Station, Diphu, Assam to study the biology of fall army worm and to evaluate various newer class of insecticides against Fall army worm, Spodoptera frugiperda in maize crop. The study revealed that the average mean of incubation period was found to be 4.3±0.03. Total developmental period from egg to adult was found to be 30-45 days with an average mean of 36.4±1.34.The egg laying capacity of the female moth varied 100-450 eggs with an average of 280.9±1.34. The efficacy study of newer class of insecticides revealed that all the treatments were effective in controlling the pest population with the highest reduction percentage in the treatment with Chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC (82.47) and Pyridalyl 10% EC (82.05) 10 DAT. The lowest was found in Azadirachtin 1500ppm (55.37) 10 DAT. However, a non chemical intervention during the initial stage of the pest occurance has been found to bring down the pest population in substiantial amount.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fall armyworm incubation averaged 4.3±0.03.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Interactor
Spodoptera frugiperdaSpodoptera frugiperdae1pest
Outcome
incubation periode0
Value
4.3±0.03e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera frugiperda
Spodoptera frugiperda · InteractorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the average mean of incubation period was found to be 4.3±0.03”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 262–324 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–77 · show in text ↑
e1

“fall army worm, Spodoptera frugiperda in maize crop”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 185–236 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fall armyworm egg-to-adult development lasted 30-45 days, averaging 36.4±1.34.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Interactor
Spodoptera frugiperdaSpodoptera frugiperdae1pest
Outcome
developmental period from egg to adulte0
Value
30-45 dayse0
Qualifier
36.4±1.34e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera frugiperda
Spodoptera frugiperda · InteractorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total developmental period from egg to adult was found to be 30-45 days with an average mean of 36.4±1.34”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 326–431 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–77 · show in text ↑
e1

“fall army worm, Spodoptera frugiperda in maize crop”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 185–236 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Female moths laid 100-450 eggs, averaging 280.9±1.34.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Interactor
Spodoptera frugiperdaSpodoptera frugiperdae1pest
Outcome
egg laying capacity of the female mothe0
Value
100-450 eggse0
Qualifier
280.9±1.34e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera frugiperda
Spodoptera frugiperda · InteractorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The egg laying capacity of the female moth varied 100-450 eggs with an average of 280.9±1.34”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 432–524 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–77 · show in text ↑
e1

“fall army worm, Spodoptera frugiperda in maize crop”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 185–236 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All insecticide treatments controlled the pest population.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
newer class of insecticidese1
Interactor
Spodoptera frugiperdaSpodoptera frugiperdae1pest
Outcome
pest populatione0
Direction
controllinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera frugiperda
Spodoptera frugiperda · InteractorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all the treatments were effective in controlling the pest population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–658 · show in text ↑
e1

“newer class of insecticides against Fall army worm, Spodoptera frugiperda in maize crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 149–236 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC had the highest pest reduction at 82.47 after 10 DAT.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SCe0
Interactor
Spodoptera frugiperdaSpodoptera frugiperdat0pest
Outcome
reduction percentagee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
82.47e0
Qualifier
10 DATe1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera frugiperda
Spodoptera frugiperda · InteractorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest reduction percentage in the treatment with Chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC (82.47)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–754 · show in text ↑
e1

“(82.05) 10 DAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–790 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spodoptera frugiperda in maize crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pyridalyl 10% EC gave 82.05 pest reduction after 10 DAT.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Pyridalyl 10% ECe0
Interactor
Spodoptera frugiperdaSpodoptera frugiperdat0pest
Outcome
reduction percentagee1
Direction
higheste1
Value
82.05e0
Qualifier
10 DATe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera frugiperda
Spodoptera frugiperda · InteractorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pyridalyl 10% EC (82.05) 10 DAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–790 · show in text ↑
e1

“the highest reduction percentage in the treatment with Chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC (82.47) and Pyridalyl 10% EC (82.05) 10 DAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–790 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spodoptera frugiperda in maize crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azadirachtin 1500ppm had the lowest pest reduction, 55.37 after 10 DAT.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Azadirachtin 1500ppme0
Interactor
Spodoptera frugiperdaSpodoptera frugiperdat0pest
Outcome
reduction percentagee1
Direction
loweste0
Value
55.37e0
Qualifier
10 DATe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera frugiperda
Spodoptera frugiperda · InteractorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest was found in Azadirachtin 1500ppm (55.37) 10 DAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–851 · show in text ↑
e1

“reduction percentage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–696 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spodoptera frugiperda in maize crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

An early nonchemical intervention substantially lowered the pest population.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
non chemical interventione0
Interactor
Spodoptera frugiperdaSpodoptera frugiperdat0pest
Outcome
pest populatione0
Direction
bring downe0
Qualifier
during the initial stage of the pest occurancee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera frugiperda
Spodoptera frugiperda · InteractorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a non chemical intervention during the initial stage of the pest occurance has been found to bring down the pest population in substiantial amount”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–1008 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spodoptera frugiperda in maize crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–77 · show in text ↑

chlorantraniliprole · Spodoptera frugiperda · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

48 papers: 47 positive, 1 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

conjugated linoleic acid · Spodoptera frugiperda · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

azadirachtin · Spodoptera frugiperda · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

insecticide · Spodoptera frugiperda · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 30 positive, 7 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.