Paper · 2024 · SVU-International Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Response of upland rice (Oryza sativa L.) variety NSIC Rc27 TO intercropping scheme at different sowing time of mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) intercrop

J.A. Labrador; D.M. Bañoc; A.G. Luz; et al.

11
claims
19
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

The intercropping system stands as a prevalent strategy for augmenting crop yield. To test the mentioned system, a study was conducted to evaluate the impact of intercropping systems and mungbean sowing time on upland rice using the NSIC Rc27 variety under different mungbean sowing times. The experiment was laid out in Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) using a split-plot arrangement with three replications, intercropping systems were distributed in the main plots while the sowing time of mungbean plants was arranged in sub-plots. Results showed that the tested factors and their interaction did not have significant effects on leaf area index (LAI), crop growth rate (CGR), relative growth rate (RGR), and yield components for both upland rice and mungbean. On the other hand, notable variations were observed in weed parameters, agronomic characteristics, and grain yield of both crops. Monocropping and early mungbean sowing time (14 days before upland rice establishment) led to early flowering but delayed maturity in upland rice. The land and area-time equivalent ratios were greater than one, indicating that both crops can be grown together, wherein simultaneous planting was the most effective treatment. The intercropping scheme resulted in a lower weed population. Monocropping upland rice yielded a net profit of PhP38,425 while intercropping with mungbean 14 days before upland rice establishment resulted in a higher net profit of PhP70,325. Similarly, monocropping mungbean yielded PhP197,175.00 while intercropping with upland rice 14 days earlier produced the highest net profit of PhP283,575.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tested factors and interaction had no significant effect on rice LAI, CGR and RGR.

Taxon
upland riceOryza sativat0
Treatment
tested factorse0
Outcome
leaf area index (LAI), crop growth rate (CGR), relative growth rate (RGR)e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tested factors and their interaction did not have significant effects on leaf area index (LAI), crop growth rate (CGR), relative growth rate (RGR), and yield components for both upland rice and mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–768 · show in text ↑
t0

“upland rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tested factors and interaction had no significant effect on mungbean yield components.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
tested factorse0
Outcome
yield componentse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tested factors and their interaction did not have significant effects on leaf area index (LAI), crop growth rate (CGR), relative growth rate (RGR), and yield components for both upland rice and mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–768 · show in text ↑
t0

“mungbean (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–139 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Monocropping with early mungbean sowing advanced rice flowering.

Taxon
upland riceOryza sativae0
Treatment
early mungbean sowing time (14 days before upland rice establishment)e0
Outcome
floweringe0
Direction
earlye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Monocropping and early mungbean sowing time (14 days before upland rice establishment) led to early flowering but delayed maturity in upland rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–1045 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Monocropping with early mungbean sowing delayed rice maturity.

Taxon
upland riceOryza sativae0
Treatment
early mungbean sowing time (14 days before upland rice establishment)e0
Outcome
maturitye0
Direction
delayede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Monocropping and early mungbean sowing time (14 days before upland rice establishment) led to early flowering but delayed maturity in upland rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–1045 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Land and area-time equivalent ratios exceeded one.

Taxon
upland riceOryza sativat0
Outcome
land and area-time equivalent ratiose0
Direction
greater thane0
Value
onee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“land and area-time equivalent ratios were greater than one”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1051–1109 · show in text ↑
t0

“upland rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–41 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Simultaneous planting was the most effective treatment.

Taxon
upland riceOryza sativat0
Treatment
simultaneous plantinge0
Outcome
most effective treatmente0
Direction
most effectivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“simultaneous planting was the most effective treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1169–1223 · show in text ↑
t0

“upland rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping lowered weed population.

Taxon
upland riceOryza sativat0
Treatment
intercropping schemee0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed populatione0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The intercropping scheme resulted in a lower weed population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1225–1285 · show in text ↑
t0

“upland rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–41 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Monocropped rice net profit was PhP38,425.

Taxon
upland riceOryza sativae0
Treatment
Monocroppinge0
Outcome
net profite0
Value
PhP38,425e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Monocropping upland rice yielded a net profit of PhP38,425”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1287–1345 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice intercropped with mungbean 14 days earlier had a higher net profit of PhP70,325.

Taxon
upland riceOryza sativae0
Treatment
intercropping with mungbean 14 days before upland rice establishmente0
Outcome
net profite0
Direction
highere0
Value
PhP70,325e0
Comparator
Monocropping upland ricee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping with mungbean 14 days before upland rice establishment resulted in a higher net profit of PhP70,325”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1352–1465 · show in text ↑
e1

“Monocropping upland rice yielded a net profit of PhP38,425”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1287–1345 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Monocropped mungbean net profit was PhP197,175.00.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Treatment
monocroppinge0
Outcome
yieldede0
Value
PhP197,175.00e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“monocropping mungbean yielded PhP197,175.00”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1478–1521 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mungbean intercropped with rice sown 14 days earlier had the highest net profit of PhP283,575.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
intercropping with upland rice 14 days earliere0
Outcome
net profite0
Direction
higheste0
Value
PhP283,575e0
Comparator
monocropping mungbeane1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping with upland rice 14 days earlier produced the highest net profit of PhP283,575”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1528–1620 · show in text ↑
e1

“monocropping mungbean yielded PhP197,175.00”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1478–1521 · show in text ↑
t0

“mungbean (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–139 · show in text ↑

Oryza sativa · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 14 positive, 2 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Vigna radiata · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 25 positive, 5 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

intercropping · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

95 papers: 77 positive, 18 negative or no effect

76 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

91 papers more in this group

See all 95 papers →

intercropping · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

49 papers: 28 positive, 21 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

intercropping · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.