Paper · 2024 · Scientific African

A new phosphorus fertilizer blend enhances grain legume yield and profitability in northern part of Ghana

Samuel Adjei-Nsiah; Jacob Ulzen

14
claims
26
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Low concentrations of phosphorus limit grain legumes’ yield in the northern part of Ghana. Smallholder farmers could benefit from P-fertilizer blends to improve yield. This study evaluated the responses of soybean, cowpea and groundnut to P-fertilizer blends and their profitability in researcher-managed and farmer-managed trials in Northern, Upper West, and Upper East regions. The experiment was set up in a cross-factorial arranged in randomized complete block design with four replications. The treatments were two types of P-fertilizer blends (triple superphosphate and new yaraLegume applied at 30 kg P ha−1), a control and three varieties each of soybean (TGX 1835-10E, TGX 1789-8E and TGX 1834-5E), cowpea (Padituya, Wang-Kae and Kirkhouse), and groundnut (Samnut 23, Samnut 22 and Yenyawwaso). P-fertilizer blends increased grain yield of grain legumes in researcher-managed trials. In the researcher-managed trials, P-fertilizer blends doubled the nodulation of soybean varieties but did not influence the nodulation of cowpea and groundnut. P-fertilizer blends increased P-agronomic efficiency over control; however, the different P-fertilizer blends had similar P-use efficiencies. In farmer-managed trials, only the yield of groundnuts varied with the different P-fertilizer blends in the Upper West region, suggesting that P utilization may be location-specific for groundnuts. P-fertilizer blends increased the grain yield of soybean and cowpea varieties in the Northern and Upper West regions but not the Upper East region. The interaction between soybean and cowpea varieties and P-fertilizer blends was not significant. P-fertilizer blends recorded a higher value cost ratios (VCRs) that can offset uncertainties in price fluctuations. The high VCRs indicated that P-fertilizer blends were profitable and could be used to improve the livelihoods of smallholder grain legume farmers. The study demonstrated that grain legumes responded to P-fertilizer blends and are profitable. However, the non-responsive nature of the Upper East soils needs to be investigated to make P-fertilizer blends profitable in the region.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P-fertilizer blends increased grain yield of grain legumes in researcher-managed trials.

Taxon
grain legumese2
Treatment
P-fertilizer blendse2
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
increasede2
Setting
researcher-managed trialse2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e2

“P-fertilizer blends increased grain yield of grain legumes in researcher-managed trials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–891 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In researcher-managed trials, P-fertilizer blends doubled the nodulation of soybean varieties.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe2
Material
TGX 1835-10E, TGX 1789-8E and TGX 1834-5Ee1
Treatment
P-fertilizer blendse2
Outcome
nodulatione2
Direction
doublede2
Setting
researcher-managed trialse2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“three varieties each of soybean (TGX 1835-10E, TGX 1789-8E and TGX 1834-5E), cowpea (Padituya, Wang-Kae and Kirkhouse), and groundnut (Samnut 23, Samnut 22 and Yenyawwaso)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–802 · show in text ↑
e2

“In the researcher-managed trials, P-fertilizer blends doubled the nodulation of soybean varieties but did not influence the nodulation of cowpea and groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–1051 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In researcher-managed trials, P-fertilizer blends did not influence nodulation of cowpea.

Material
Padituya, Wang-Kae and Kirkhousee1
Treatment
P-fertilizer blendse2
Outcome
nodulatione2
Direction
did not influencee2
Setting
researcher-managed trialse2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“three varieties each of soybean (TGX 1835-10E, TGX 1789-8E and TGX 1834-5E), cowpea (Padituya, Wang-Kae and Kirkhouse), and groundnut (Samnut 23, Samnut 22 and Yenyawwaso)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–802 · show in text ↑
e2

“In the researcher-managed trials, P-fertilizer blends doubled the nodulation of soybean varieties but did not influence the nodulation of cowpea and groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–1051 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In researcher-managed trials, P-fertilizer blends did not influence nodulation of groundnut.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae2
Material
Samnut 23, Samnut 22 and Yenyawwasoe1
Treatment
P-fertilizer blendse2
Outcome
nodulatione2
Direction
did not influencee2
Setting
researcher-managed trialse2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“three varieties each of soybean (TGX 1835-10E, TGX 1789-8E and TGX 1834-5E), cowpea (Padituya, Wang-Kae and Kirkhouse), and groundnut (Samnut 23, Samnut 22 and Yenyawwaso)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–802 · show in text ↑
e2

“In the researcher-managed trials, P-fertilizer blends doubled the nodulation of soybean varieties but did not influence the nodulation of cowpea and groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–1051 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P-fertilizer blends increased P-agronomic efficiency over control in grain legumes.

Taxon
grain legumet0
Treatment
P-fertilizer blendse3
Outcome
P-agronomic efficiencye3
Direction
increasede3
Comparator
controle3

Verbatim

t0

“A new phosphorus fertilizer blend enhances grain legume yield and profitability in northern part of Ghana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–105 · show in text ↑
e3

“P-fertilizer blends increased P-agronomic efficiency over control; however, the different P-fertilizer blends had similar P-use efficiencies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1053–1193 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The different P-fertilizer blends had similar P-use efficiencies in grain legumes.

Taxon
grain legumet0
Treatment
different P-fertilizer blendse3
Outcome
P-use efficienciese3
Direction
similare3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“A new phosphorus fertilizer blend enhances grain legume yield and profitability in northern part of Ghana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–105 · show in text ↑
e3

“P-fertilizer blends increased P-agronomic efficiency over control; however, the different P-fertilizer blends had similar P-use efficiencies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1053–1193 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Only the yield of groundnuts varied with the different P-fertilizer blends in the Upper West region in farmer-managed trials.

Taxon
groundnutsArachis hypogaeae5
Material
Samnut 23, Samnut 22 and Yenyawwasoe1
Treatment
different P-fertilizer blendse5
Outcome
yield of groundnutse5
Direction
variede5
Setting
Upper West regione5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“three varieties each of soybean (TGX 1835-10E, TGX 1789-8E and TGX 1834-5E), cowpea (Padituya, Wang-Kae and Kirkhouse), and groundnut (Samnut 23, Samnut 22 and Yenyawwaso)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–802 · show in text ↑
e5

“In farmer-managed trials, only the yield of groundnuts varied with the different P-fertilizer blends in the Upper West region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1320 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P-fertilizer blends increased grain yield of soybean varieties in the Northern and Upper West regions.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe6
Material
TGX 1835-10E, TGX 1789-8E and TGX 1834-5Ee1
Treatment
P-fertilizer blendse6
Outcome
grain yielde6
Direction
increasede6
Setting
Northern and Upper West regionse6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“three varieties each of soybean (TGX 1835-10E, TGX 1789-8E and TGX 1834-5E), cowpea (Padituya, Wang-Kae and Kirkhouse), and groundnut (Samnut 23, Samnut 22 and Yenyawwaso)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–802 · show in text ↑
e6

“P-fertilizer blends increased the grain yield of soybean and cowpea varieties in the Northern and Upper West regions but not the Upper East region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1393–1539 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P-fertilizer blends increased grain yield of cowpea varieties in the Northern and Upper West regions.

Material
Padituya, Wang-Kae and Kirkhousee1
Treatment
P-fertilizer blendse6
Outcome
grain yielde6
Direction
increasede6
Setting
Northern and Upper West regionse6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“three varieties each of soybean (TGX 1835-10E, TGX 1789-8E and TGX 1834-5E), cowpea (Padituya, Wang-Kae and Kirkhouse), and groundnut (Samnut 23, Samnut 22 and Yenyawwaso)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–802 · show in text ↑
e6

“P-fertilizer blends increased the grain yield of soybean and cowpea varieties in the Northern and Upper West regions but not the Upper East region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1393–1539 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P-fertilizer blends did not increase grain yield of soybean varieties in the Upper East region.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe6
Material
TGX 1835-10E, TGX 1789-8E and TGX 1834-5Ee1
Treatment
P-fertilizer blendse6
Outcome
grain yielde6
Direction
increasede6
Qualifier
but not the Upper East regione6
Setting
Upper East regione6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“three varieties each of soybean (TGX 1835-10E, TGX 1789-8E and TGX 1834-5E), cowpea (Padituya, Wang-Kae and Kirkhouse), and groundnut (Samnut 23, Samnut 22 and Yenyawwaso)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–802 · show in text ↑
e6

“P-fertilizer blends increased the grain yield of soybean and cowpea varieties in the Northern and Upper West regions but not the Upper East region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1393–1539 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P-fertilizer blends did not increase grain yield of cowpea varieties in the Upper East region.

Material
Padituya, Wang-Kae and Kirkhousee1
Treatment
P-fertilizer blendse6
Outcome
grain yielde6
Direction
increasede6
Qualifier
but not the Upper East regione6
Setting
Upper East regione6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“three varieties each of soybean (TGX 1835-10E, TGX 1789-8E and TGX 1834-5E), cowpea (Padituya, Wang-Kae and Kirkhouse), and groundnut (Samnut 23, Samnut 22 and Yenyawwaso)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–802 · show in text ↑
e6

“P-fertilizer blends increased the grain yield of soybean and cowpea varieties in the Northern and Upper West regions but not the Upper East region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1393–1539 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The interaction between soybean and cowpea varieties and P-fertilizer blends was not significant.

Taxon
soybean and cowpea varietiesGlycine maxVigna unguiculatae7
Treatment
P-fertilizer blendse7
Outcome
interactione7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“The interaction between soybean and cowpea varieties and P-fertilizer blends was not significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1541–1637 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P-fertilizer blends recorded a higher value cost ratio in grain legumes.

Taxon
grain legumet0
Treatment
P-fertilizer blendse1
Outcome
value cost ratios (VCRs)e1
Direction
highere1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“A new phosphorus fertilizer blend enhances grain legume yield and profitability in northern part of Ghana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–105 · show in text ↑
e1

“P-fertilizer blends recorded a higher value cost ratios (VCRs) that can offset uncertainties in price fluctuations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1639–1753 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P-fertilizer blends were profitable for grain legumes, as indicated by high value cost ratios.

Taxon
grain legumet0
Treatment
P-fertilizer blendse1
Outcome
profitablee1

Verbatim

t0

“A new phosphorus fertilizer blend enhances grain legume yield and profitability in northern part of Ghana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–105 · show in text ↑
e1

“The high VCRs indicated that P-fertilizer blends were profitable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1755–1819 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · symbiosis · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

32 papers: 28 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

113 papers: 107 positive, 6 negative or no effect

106 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

109 papers more in this group

See all 113 papers →

phosphorus · symbiosis · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 27 positive, 1 negative or no effect

27 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

phosphorus · symbiosis · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

81 papers: 71 positive, 10 negative or no effect

70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

77 papers more in this group

See all 81 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

355 papers: 303 positive, 52 negative or no effect

302 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

351 papers more in this group

See all 355 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.