Paper · 2024 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Effect of formula fertilizers on peach yield, quality, and environmental footprint

Jiayang Ma; Tingyao Cai; Juanyu Wang; et al.

7
claims
19
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Peach production in China uses large inputs of mineral fertilizers but lower inputs of organic fertilizers, resulting in decreased peach quality and increased environmental risks. This study investigated the effects of formula fertilizers (combined organic and inorganic fertilizers) on peach yield, quality, and carbon and nitrogen footprints using three peach cultivars in two consecutive years. Two types of formula fertilizers had positive effects on improving the peach yield (5.6–13.6%), single fruit weight (9.0–32.5%), transverse diameter (3.6–13%) and longitudinal diameter (5.4–21.6%). Also, these fertilizers increased soluble solids (7.2–36.6%) and vitamin C (7.1–78%). In addition, the carbon footprint of peach decreased by 37–49%. This study demonstrates the potential of formula fertilizers to achieve balance between peach quality and environmental health.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Formula fertilizers raised peach yield by 5.6–13.6%.

Treatment
formula fertilizerse0
Outcome
peach yielde0
Direction
improvinge0
Value
5.6–13.6%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–38 · show in text ↑
e0

“Two types of formula fertilizers had positive effects on improving the peach yield (5.6–13.6%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 398–492 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Formula fertilizers raised single fruit weight by 9.0–32.5%.

Treatment
formula fertilizerse1
Outcome
single fruit weighte0
Direction
improvinge1
Value
9.0–32.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–38 · show in text ↑
e0

“single fruit weight (9.0–32.5%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 494–525 · show in text ↑
e1

“Two types of formula fertilizers had positive effects on improving the peach yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 398–480 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Formula fertilizers raised transverse diameter by 3.6–13%.

Treatment
formula fertilizerse1
Outcome
transverse diametere0
Direction
improvinge1
Value
3.6–13%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–38 · show in text ↑
e0

“transverse diameter (3.6–13%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–556 · show in text ↑
e1

“Two types of formula fertilizers had positive effects on improving the peach yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 398–480 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Formula fertilizers raised longitudinal diameter by 5.4–21.6%.

Treatment
formula fertilizerse1
Outcome
longitudinal diametere0
Direction
improvinge1
Value
5.4–21.6%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–38 · show in text ↑
e0

“longitudinal diameter (5.4–21.6%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–594 · show in text ↑
e1

“Two types of formula fertilizers had positive effects on improving the peach yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 398–480 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Formula fertilizers increased soluble solids by 7.2–36.6%.

Treatment
formula fertilizerse1
Outcome
soluble solidse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
7.2–36.6%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–38 · show in text ↑
e0

“these fertilizers increased soluble solids (7.2–36.6%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 602–656 · show in text ↑
e1

“formula fertilizers (combined organic and inorganic fertilizers)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 219–283 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Formula fertilizers increased vitamin C by 7.1–78%.

Treatment
formula fertilizerse1
Outcome
vitamin Ce0
Direction
increasede0
Value
7.1–78%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–38 · show in text ↑
e0

“these fertilizers increased soluble solids (7.2–36.6%) and vitamin C (7.1–78%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 602–680 · show in text ↑
e1

“formula fertilizers (combined organic and inorganic fertilizers)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 219–283 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Formula fertilizers decreased the peach carbon footprint by 37–49%.

Treatment
formula fertilizerse1
Outcome
carbon footprint of peache0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
37–49%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the carbon footprint of peach decreased by 37–49%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–744 · show in text ↑
e1

“formula fertilizers (combined organic and inorganic fertilizers)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 219–283 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Prunus persica (peach)Results differ

59 papers: 50 positive, 9 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

55 papers more in this group

See all 59 papers →

fertilization · quality: phytochemicals · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 11 positive, 4 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

fertilization · growth · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 33 positive, 3 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

fertilization · environment: emissions · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.