Paper · 2022 · Bioscience Journal

Bioactive compounds and physical-chemical characteristics of two genotypes of peach trees submitted to nitrogen fertilization

Caroline Farias Barreto; Leticia Vanni Fereira; Renan Navroski; et al.

9
claims
12
verbatim quotes
5
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Nitrogen, which is the primary nutrient peach trees need, may affect their fruit quality. Thus, this study aimed at evaluating the effect of nitrogen fertilization on two genotypes of peach trees, regarding their fruit quality, in three consecutive crops. The experiment was carried out in the experimental area that belongs to the Embrapa Clima Temperado, located in Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul (RS), Brazil, from 2016, 2016, 2017 and 2018. Four doses of nitrogen (0, 60, 120 and 180 Kg ha-1) and two peach tree genotypes (‘Cascata 1513’ and ‘Cascata 1067’) were used. For the fruit, we evaluated epidermis color, pulp firmness, epidermis firmness, soluble solids concentration, titratable acidity, concentration of total phenolic compounds, anthocyanins and antioxidant activity. Fruit underwent physical, chemical and bioactive compound analyses. Results showed that the highest dose of nitrogen (180 Kg ha-1) applied to the soil retards fruit ripening, while no application of nitrogen fertilization brings fruit maturation forward. Nitrogen fertilization via soil does not favor anthocyanins in fruit. Doses of 60 and 120 Kg ha-1 of nitrogen are recommended because they lead to improvement in peach color, epidermis firmness and acidity. Peach tree genotypes influence soluble solids, juice pH, phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity of their fruit.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest nitrogen dose delayed peach ripening.

Taxon
peach treesPrunus persicat0
Treatment
highest dose of nitrogen (180 Kg ha-1)e0
Outcome
fruit ripeninge0
Direction
retardse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest dose of nitrogen (180 Kg ha-1) applied to the soil retards fruit ripening”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–954 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No nitrogen fertilization advanced peach maturation.

Taxon
peach treesPrunus persicat0
Treatment
no application of nitrogen fertilizatione0
Outcome
fruit maturatione0
Direction
brings fruit maturation forwarde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no application of nitrogen fertilization brings fruit maturation forward.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1035 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil nitrogen fertilization did not favor fruit anthocyanins.

Taxon
peach treesPrunus persicat0
Treatment
Nitrogen fertilization via soile0
Outcome
anthocyanins in fruite0
Direction
does not favore0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen fertilization via soil does not favor anthocyanins in fruit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1105 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–89 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 60 Kg ha-1 nitrogen for peach quality.

Outcome
Doses of 60e0
Qualifier
Kg ha-1 of nitrogene0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Doses of 60 and 120 Kg ha-1 of nitrogen are recommended because they lead to improvement in peach color, epidermis firmness and acidity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1242 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 120 Kg ha-1 nitrogen for peach quality.

Outcome
120 Kg ha-1 of nitrogene0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Doses of 60 and 120 Kg ha-1 of nitrogen are recommended because they lead to improvement in peach color, epidermis firmness and acidity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1242 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

60 Kg ha-1 nitrogen improved peach color, epidermis firmness and acidity.

Treatment
60e0
Outcome
peach color, epidermis firmness and aciditye0
Direction
improvemente0
Qualifier
Kg ha-1 of nitrogene0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Doses of 60 and 120 Kg ha-1 of nitrogen are recommended because they lead to improvement in peach color, epidermis firmness and acidity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1242 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

120 Kg ha-1 nitrogen improved peach color, epidermis firmness and acidity.

Treatment
120 Kg ha-1 of nitrogene0
Outcome
peach color, epidermis firmness and aciditye0
Direction
improvemente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Doses of 60 and 120 Kg ha-1 of nitrogen are recommended because they lead to improvement in peach color, epidermis firmness and acidity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1242 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peach genotype influenced soluble solids and juice pH.

Material
genotypese0
Outcome
soluble solids, juice pHe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Peach tree genotypes influence soluble solids, juice pH, phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity of their fruit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1243–1359 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peach genotype influenced fruit phenolics and antioxidant activity.

Material
genotypese0
Outcome
phenolic compounds and antioxidant activitye0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Peach tree genotypes influence soluble solids, juice pH, phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity of their fruit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1243–1359 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · quality: sugar starch · Prunus persica (peach)Results differ

13 papers: 6 positive, 7 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

fertilization · quality: phytochemicals · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.