Paper · 2024 · TURKISH JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY

Local organic and inorganic amendments to improve table grape production inMediterranean vineyards of southern Türkiye

SEMİH TANGOLAR; SIMONE PRIORI; SERPİL TANGOLAR; et al.

10
claims
21
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In the Mediterranean Region, calcareous soils are generally considered to be of low fertility. The use of large amounts of chemicals and irrigation to compensate for low productivity reduces the producer’s net profit and degrades physical and chemical properties of the soils. As a result, the selection of adaptable genotypes is important in agriculturally limited lands. Grapevine is one of the leading crops in the Mediterranean Basin due to its high tolerance to abiotic conditions. However, the fact that the grapevine grows in extreme soils does not mean that such crop does not respond to a good nutritional program, especially to the natural amendments. In this research, natural organic and inorganic soil amendments were tested on “Prima” grape cultivar grown in calcareous soils of the Mediterranean Basin, with the aim of developing environmentally friendly and cost-effective nutrition recommendations. Basaltic pumice (P), cereal straw (S), commercial dried compost (DC), grapevine pruning residue (PR), and farm cattle manure (FM) were used alone or in different combinations. The combination of P+PR+FM produced the best results for yield, cluster weight, and berry weight. However, it also resulted in the highest acidity and the lowest ripening index (total soluble solids/acidity). The highest ripening index values were obtained from S+FM and PR+FM applications. The treatments did not have different effects on total sugars, organic acids, and malvidin-3 glucoside anthocyanin, a relatively abundant component in V. vinifera grapes. However, P+PR+FM resulted in significantly higher levels of ascorbate peroxidase and total amino acids. The highest total anthocyanins were shown by DC, P+DC, and P+PR+FM. The results of the work demonstrated that the uses of different mixtures of natural and readily available materials have positive and diverse effects on grape quantity and quality in Mediterranean calcareous soils where vine is widely cultivated.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The P+PR+FM combination gave the best yield, cluster weight and berry weight.

Taxon
grapee0
Treatment
P+PR+FMe1
Outcome
yield, cluster weight, and berry weighte1
Direction
best resultse1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“natural organic and inorganic soil amendments were tested on “Prima” grape cultivar grown in calcareous soils of the Mediterranean Basin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–816 · show in text ↑
e1

“The combination of P+PR+FM produced the best results for yield, cluster weight, and berry weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1092–1188 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The P+PR+FM combination resulted in the highest acidity.

Taxon
grapee0
Treatment
P+PR+FMe1
Outcome
aciditye2
Direction
higheste2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“natural organic and inorganic soil amendments were tested on “Prima” grape cultivar grown in calcareous soils of the Mediterranean Basin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–816 · show in text ↑
e1

“The combination of P+PR+FM produced the best results for yield, cluster weight, and berry weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1092–1188 · show in text ↑
e2

“However, it also resulted in the highest acidity and the lowest ripening index (total soluble solids/acidity)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1299 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The P+PR+FM combination resulted in the lowest ripening index.

Taxon
grapee0
Treatment
P+PR+FMe1
Outcome
ripening indexe2
Direction
loweste2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“natural organic and inorganic soil amendments were tested on “Prima” grape cultivar grown in calcareous soils of the Mediterranean Basin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–816 · show in text ↑
e1

“The combination of P+PR+FM produced the best results for yield, cluster weight, and berry weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1092–1188 · show in text ↑
e2

“However, it also resulted in the highest acidity and the lowest ripening index (total soluble solids/acidity)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1299 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The S+FM application gave the highest ripening index values.

Taxon
grapee0
Treatment
S+FMe3
Outcome
ripening index valuese3
Direction
higheste3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“natural organic and inorganic soil amendments were tested on “Prima” grape cultivar grown in calcareous soils of the Mediterranean Basin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–816 · show in text ↑
e3

“The highest ripening index values were obtained from S+FM and PR+FM applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1301–1381 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The PR+FM application gave the highest ripening index values.

Taxon
grapee0
Treatment
PR+FMe3
Outcome
ripening index valuese3
Direction
higheste3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“natural organic and inorganic soil amendments were tested on “Prima” grape cultivar grown in calcareous soils of the Mediterranean Basin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–816 · show in text ↑
e3

“The highest ripening index values were obtained from S+FM and PR+FM applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1301–1381 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatments did not differ in total sugars, organic acids or malvidin-3 glucoside anthocyanin.

Taxon
V. vinifera grapese4
Treatment
The treatmentse4
Outcome
total sugars, organic acids, and malvidin-3 glucoside anthocyanine4
Direction
no_changeinferrede4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e4

“The treatments did not have different effects on total sugars, organic acids, and malvidin-3 glucoside anthocyanin, a relatively abundant component in V. vinifera grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1383–1552 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

P+PR+FM significantly increased ascorbate peroxidase and total amino acids.

Taxon
grapee0
Treatment
P+PR+FMe5
Outcome
ascorbate peroxidase and total amino acidse5
Direction
significantly highere5

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“natural organic and inorganic soil amendments were tested on “Prima” grape cultivar grown in calcareous soils of the Mediterranean Basin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–816 · show in text ↑
e5

“However, P+PR+FM resulted in significantly higher levels of ascorbate peroxidase and total amino acids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1554–1656 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DC gave the highest total anthocyanins.

Taxon
grapee0
Treatment
DCe6
Outcome
total anthocyaninse6
Direction
higheste6

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“natural organic and inorganic soil amendments were tested on “Prima” grape cultivar grown in calcareous soils of the Mediterranean Basin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–816 · show in text ↑
e6

“The highest total anthocyanins were shown by DC, P+DC, and P+PR+FM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1658–1724 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P+DC gave the highest total anthocyanins.

Taxon
grapee0
Treatment
P+DCe6
Outcome
total anthocyaninse6
Direction
higheste6

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“natural organic and inorganic soil amendments were tested on “Prima” grape cultivar grown in calcareous soils of the Mediterranean Basin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–816 · show in text ↑
e6

“The highest total anthocyanins were shown by DC, P+DC, and P+PR+FM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1658–1724 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P+PR+FM gave the highest total anthocyanins.

Taxon
grapee0
Treatment
P+PR+FMe6
Outcome
total anthocyaninse6
Direction
higheste6

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“natural organic and inorganic soil amendments were tested on “Prima” grape cultivar grown in calcareous soils of the Mediterranean Basin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–816 · show in text ↑
e6

“The highest total anthocyanins were shown by DC, P+DC, and P+PR+FM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1658–1724 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · VitisResults differ

107 papers: 97 positive, 10 negative or no effect

96 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

103 papers more in this group

See all 107 papers →

pruning · yield · VitisPositive and negative results

107 papers: 71 positive, 36 negative or no effect

70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

103 papers more in this group

See all 107 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.