Paper · 2024 · Water

Irrigation and Agricultural Opportunities: Evaluating Hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) Suitability and Productivity in Lebanon

Rhend Sleiman; Jocelyne Adjizian Gerard; Salim Fahed; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Within the prevalent challenges posed by climate change and decreasing resources, this research underscores the importance of adopting sustainable agricultural practices combined with efficient water resource management. Employing comprehensive climate and soil suitability analyses, this research analyzed the capacity of hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) to adapt to Lebanon’s heterogeneous environmental landscapes across two distinct growing seasons (autumn and spring). Both climate and edaphic suitability mapping were conducted to study hemp’s suitability. AquaCrop v.7.1 was used to simulate seed yield, biomass production, irrigation needs and yield water productivity in the different agro-homogeneous zones of Lebanon for the two considered seasons. The findings revealed that approximately 30% and 19% of Lebanon’s land exhibit suitability for hemp cultivation during the spring and autumn seasons, respectively. According to AquaCrop model simulations, under the prevailing climatic conditions, the predicted seed yield will range from 3.7 to 5.6 t ha−1 under rainfed conditions and will reach 11.1 t ha−1 for irrigated cultivation. Moreover, employing efficient irrigation techniques during the spring season showed a significant improvement in both yield and biomass of hemp. The enhancement was evident, with notable increases of 112.22% in yield and 96.43% in biomass compared to rainfed conditions. This research highlights the importance of identifying suitable regions within Lebanon capable of supporting hemp cultivation in a sustainable manner. Such research not only promises economic development but also aligns with broader global sustainability objectives.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

About 30% of Lebanon’s land is suitable for hemp cultivation in spring.

Outcome
suitabilitye2
Value
30%e2
Qualifier
springe2
Setting
Lebanon’s lande2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa
Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Bastique assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) to adapt to Lebanon’s heterogeneous environmental landscapes across two distinct growing seasons (autumn and spring)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–465 · show in text ↑
e2

“approximately 30% and 19% of Lebanon’s land exhibit suitability for hemp cultivation during the spring and autumn seasons, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–915 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

About 19% of Lebanon’s land is suitable for hemp cultivation in autumn.

Outcome
suitabilitye2
Value
19%e2
Qualifier
autumne2
Setting
Lebanon’s lande2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa
Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Bastique assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) to adapt to Lebanon’s heterogeneous environmental landscapes across two distinct growing seasons (autumn and spring)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–465 · show in text ↑
e2

“approximately 30% and 19% of Lebanon’s land exhibit suitability for hemp cultivation during the spring and autumn seasons, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–915 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

AquaCrop predicts a hemp seed yield of 3.7 to 5.6 t ha−1 under rainfed conditions.

Outcome
seed yielde3
Value
3.7 to 5.6 t ha−1e3
Setting
rainfed conditionse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa
Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Bastique assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) to adapt to Lebanon’s heterogeneous environmental landscapes across two distinct growing seasons (autumn and spring)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–465 · show in text ↑
e3

“the predicted seed yield will range from 3.7 to 5.6 t ha−1 under rainfed conditions and will reach 11.1 t ha−1 for irrigated cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigated hemp cultivation is predicted to reach 11.1 t ha−1 seed yield, higher than under rainfed conditions.

Treatment
irrigated cultivatione3
Outcome
seed yielde3
Direction
higherinferrede3
Value
11.1 t ha−1e3
Comparator
rainfed conditionse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa
Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Bastique assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) to adapt to Lebanon’s heterogeneous environmental landscapes across two distinct growing seasons (autumn and spring)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–465 · show in text ↑
e3

“the predicted seed yield will range from 3.7 to 5.6 t ha−1 under rainfed conditions and will reach 11.1 t ha−1 for irrigated cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)simulated

Claim · model-written summary

Efficient irrigation during the spring season increased hemp yield by 112.22% compared with rainfed conditions.

Treatment
efficient irrigation techniquese4
Outcome
yielde5
Direction
increasese5
Value
112.22%e5
Comparator
rainfed conditionse5
Setting
spring seasone4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa
Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Bastique assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“employing efficient irrigation techniques during the spring season showed a significant improvement in both yield and biomass of hemp”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1148–1281 · show in text ↑
e5

“notable increases of 112.22% in yield and 96.43% in biomass compared to rainfed conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1317–1407 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)simulated

Claim · model-written summary

Efficient irrigation during the spring season increased hemp biomass by 96.43% compared with rainfed conditions.

Treatment
efficient irrigation techniquese4
Outcome
biomasse5
Direction
increasese5
Value
96.43%e5
Comparator
rainfed conditionse5
Setting
spring seasone4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa
Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Bastique assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“employing efficient irrigation techniques during the spring season showed a significant improvement in both yield and biomass of hemp”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1148–1281 · show in text ↑
e5

“notable increases of 112.22% in yield and 96.43% in biomass compared to rainfed conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1317–1407 · show in text ↑

irrigation · growth · Cannabis sativaPositive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

irrigation · yield · Cannabis sativaPositive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.