Abstract
The present experiment was carried out at Horticulture Farm, Department of Fruit Science, College of Agriculture, IGKV, Raipur (C.G) with the objective to study the effect of IBA and bio-stimulants on sprouting behavior and shoot growth of Fig cuttings. The experiment was replicated thrice using Complete Randomized Design. Significant effect of IBA and bio-stimulants were observed on sprouting and shoot parameters of cuttings. The earliest and maximum number of sprouted cuttings, sprouting percentage of cuttings, length of longest and shortest shoot, number of shoot and fresh and dry weight of shoot were recorded in IBA 2000 ppm (19.80 days, 8.65, 86.34, 6.83 cm, 3.90 cm,4.00,15.94 gm and 5.95 gm., respectively). The highest survival percentage of cuttings was recorded in IBA 3000 ppm. Among bio-stimulants, PSB and Trichoderma virde were found to be the next best treatments in improving all the sprouting and shoot parameters in comparison to rest of the treatments.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
IBA 2000 ppm gave the earliest sprouting of fig cuttings (19.80 days).
- Taxon
- Ficus carica
Ficus caricat0 - Material
- cv. Dinkart0
- Treatment
- IBA 2000 ppme1
- Outcome
- sprouted cuttingse1
- Direction
- earlieste1
- Value
- 19.80 dayse1
- Setting
- Horticulture Farm, Department of Fruit Science, College of Agriculture, IGKV, Raipur (C.G)e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_(Ficus_carica)_-_Cagliari%2C_Italy_2024-03-26.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“fig (Ficus carica L.) cv. Dinkar”
e0“The present experiment was carried out at Horticulture Farm, Department of Fruit Science, College of Agriculture, IGKV, Raipur (C.G)”
e1“The earliest and maximum number of sprouted cuttings, sprouting percentage of cuttings, length of longest and shortest shoot, number of shoot and fresh and dry weight of shoot were recorded in IBA 2000 ppm (19.80 days, 8.65, 86.34, 6.83 cm, 3.90 cm,4.00,15.94 gm and 5.95 gm., respectively)”
Claim · model-written summary
IBA 2000 ppm gave the maximum number of sprouted fig cuttings (8.65).
- Taxon
- Ficus carica
Ficus caricat0 - Material
- cv. Dinkart0
- Treatment
- IBA 2000 ppme1
- Outcome
- number of sprouted cuttingse1
- Direction
- maximume1
- Value
- 8.65e1
- Setting
- Horticulture Farm, Department of Fruit Science, College of Agriculture, IGKV, Raipur (C.G)e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_(Ficus_carica)_-_Cagliari%2C_Italy_2024-03-26.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“fig (Ficus carica L.) cv. Dinkar”
e0“The present experiment was carried out at Horticulture Farm, Department of Fruit Science, College of Agriculture, IGKV, Raipur (C.G)”
e1“The earliest and maximum number of sprouted cuttings, sprouting percentage of cuttings, length of longest and shortest shoot, number of shoot and fresh and dry weight of shoot were recorded in IBA 2000 ppm (19.80 days, 8.65, 86.34, 6.83 cm, 3.90 cm,4.00,15.94 gm and 5.95 gm., respectively)”
Claim · model-written summary
IBA 2000 ppm gave the maximum sprouting percentage of fig cuttings (86.34).
- Taxon
- Ficus carica
Ficus caricat0 - Material
- cv. Dinkart0
- Treatment
- IBA 2000 ppme1
- Outcome
- sprouting percentage of cuttingse1
- Direction
- maximume1
- Value
- 86.34e1
- Setting
- Horticulture Farm, Department of Fruit Science, College of Agriculture, IGKV, Raipur (C.G)e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_(Ficus_carica)_-_Cagliari%2C_Italy_2024-03-26.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“fig (Ficus carica L.) cv. Dinkar”
e0“The present experiment was carried out at Horticulture Farm, Department of Fruit Science, College of Agriculture, IGKV, Raipur (C.G)”
e1“The earliest and maximum number of sprouted cuttings, sprouting percentage of cuttings, length of longest and shortest shoot, number of shoot and fresh and dry weight of shoot were recorded in IBA 2000 ppm (19.80 days, 8.65, 86.34, 6.83 cm, 3.90 cm,4.00,15.94 gm and 5.95 gm., respectively)”
Claim · model-written summary
IBA 2000 ppm gave the longest shoot length of fig cuttings (6.83 cm).
- Taxon
- Ficus carica
Ficus caricat0 - Material
- cv. Dinkart0
- Treatment
- IBA 2000 ppme1
- Outcome
- length of longeste1
- Direction
- longeste1
- Value
- 6.83 cme1
- Setting
- Horticulture Farm, Department of Fruit Science, College of Agriculture, IGKV, Raipur (C.G)e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_(Ficus_carica)_-_Cagliari%2C_Italy_2024-03-26.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“fig (Ficus carica L.) cv. Dinkar”
e0“The present experiment was carried out at Horticulture Farm, Department of Fruit Science, College of Agriculture, IGKV, Raipur (C.G)”
e1“The earliest and maximum number of sprouted cuttings, sprouting percentage of cuttings, length of longest and shortest shoot, number of shoot and fresh and dry weight of shoot were recorded in IBA 2000 ppm (19.80 days, 8.65, 86.34, 6.83 cm, 3.90 cm,4.00,15.94 gm and 5.95 gm., respectively)”
Claim · model-written summary
IBA 2000 ppm gave the shortest shoot length of fig cuttings (3.90 cm).
- Taxon
- Ficus carica
Ficus caricat0 - Material
- cv. Dinkart0
- Treatment
- IBA 2000 ppme1
- Outcome
- shortest shoote1
- Direction
- shorteste1
- Value
- 3.90 cme1
- Setting
- Horticulture Farm, Department of Fruit Science, College of Agriculture, IGKV, Raipur (C.G)e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_(Ficus_carica)_-_Cagliari%2C_Italy_2024-03-26.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“fig (Ficus carica L.) cv. Dinkar”
e0“The present experiment was carried out at Horticulture Farm, Department of Fruit Science, College of Agriculture, IGKV, Raipur (C.G)”
e1“The earliest and maximum number of sprouted cuttings, sprouting percentage of cuttings, length of longest and shortest shoot, number of shoot and fresh and dry weight of shoot were recorded in IBA 2000 ppm (19.80 days, 8.65, 86.34, 6.83 cm, 3.90 cm,4.00,15.94 gm and 5.95 gm., respectively)”
Claim · model-written summary
IBA 2000 ppm gave the maximum number of shoots per fig cutting (4.00).
- Taxon
- Ficus carica
Ficus caricat0 - Material
- cv. Dinkart0
- Treatment
- IBA 2000 ppme1
- Outcome
- number of shoote1
- Direction
- maximume1
- Value
- 4.00e1
- Setting
- Horticulture Farm, Department of Fruit Science, College of Agriculture, IGKV, Raipur (C.G)e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_(Ficus_carica)_-_Cagliari%2C_Italy_2024-03-26.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“fig (Ficus carica L.) cv. Dinkar”
e0“The present experiment was carried out at Horticulture Farm, Department of Fruit Science, College of Agriculture, IGKV, Raipur (C.G)”
e1“The earliest and maximum number of sprouted cuttings, sprouting percentage of cuttings, length of longest and shortest shoot, number of shoot and fresh and dry weight of shoot were recorded in IBA 2000 ppm (19.80 days, 8.65, 86.34, 6.83 cm, 3.90 cm,4.00,15.94 gm and 5.95 gm., respectively)”
Claim · model-written summary
IBA 2000 ppm gave the maximum fresh shoot weight of fig cuttings (15.94 gm).
- Taxon
- Ficus carica
Ficus caricat0 - Material
- cv. Dinkart0
- Treatment
- IBA 2000 ppme1
- Outcome
- fresh and dry weight of shoote1
- Direction
- maximume1
- Value
- 15.94 gme1
- Qualifier
- freshe1
- Setting
- Horticulture Farm, Department of Fruit Science, College of Agriculture, IGKV, Raipur (C.G)e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_(Ficus_carica)_-_Cagliari%2C_Italy_2024-03-26.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“fig (Ficus carica L.) cv. Dinkar”
e0“The present experiment was carried out at Horticulture Farm, Department of Fruit Science, College of Agriculture, IGKV, Raipur (C.G)”
e1“The earliest and maximum number of sprouted cuttings, sprouting percentage of cuttings, length of longest and shortest shoot, number of shoot and fresh and dry weight of shoot were recorded in IBA 2000 ppm (19.80 days, 8.65, 86.34, 6.83 cm, 3.90 cm,4.00,15.94 gm and 5.95 gm., respectively)”
Claim · model-written summary
IBA 2000 ppm gave the maximum dry shoot weight of fig cuttings (5.95 gm).
- Taxon
- Ficus carica
Ficus caricat0 - Material
- cv. Dinkart0
- Treatment
- IBA 2000 ppme1
- Outcome
- fresh and dry weight of shoote1
- Direction
- maximume1
- Value
- 5.95 gme1
- Qualifier
- drye1
- Setting
- Horticulture Farm, Department of Fruit Science, College of Agriculture, IGKV, Raipur (C.G)e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_(Ficus_carica)_-_Cagliari%2C_Italy_2024-03-26.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“fig (Ficus carica L.) cv. Dinkar”
e0“The present experiment was carried out at Horticulture Farm, Department of Fruit Science, College of Agriculture, IGKV, Raipur (C.G)”
e1“The earliest and maximum number of sprouted cuttings, sprouting percentage of cuttings, length of longest and shortest shoot, number of shoot and fresh and dry weight of shoot were recorded in IBA 2000 ppm (19.80 days, 8.65, 86.34, 6.83 cm, 3.90 cm,4.00,15.94 gm and 5.95 gm., respectively)”
Claim · model-written summary
IBA 3000 ppm gave the highest survival percentage of fig cuttings.
- Taxon
- Ficus carica
Ficus caricat0 - Material
- cv. Dinkart0
- Treatment
- IBA 3000 ppme2
- Outcome
- survival percentage of cuttingse2
- Direction
- higheste2
- Setting
- Horticulture Farm, Department of Fruit Science, College of Agriculture, IGKV, Raipur (C.G)e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_(Ficus_carica)_-_Cagliari%2C_Italy_2024-03-26.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“fig (Ficus carica L.) cv. Dinkar”
e0“The present experiment was carried out at Horticulture Farm, Department of Fruit Science, College of Agriculture, IGKV, Raipur (C.G)”
e2“The highest survival percentage of cuttings was recorded in IBA 3000 ppm”
Claim · model-written summary
Among bio-stimulants, PSB and Trichoderma virde were the next best treatments for improving sprouting and shoot parameters of fig cuttings, compared with the rest of the treatments.
- Taxon
- Ficus carica
Ficus caricat0 - Material
- cv. Dinkart0
- Treatment
- PSB and Trichoderma virdee3
- Interactor
- PSBe3symbiont
- Second interactor
- Trichoderma virdee3other
- Outcome
- sprouting and shoot parameterse3
- Direction
- next beste3
- Comparator
- rest of the treatmentse3
- Setting
- Horticulture Farm, Department of Fruit Science, College of Agriculture, IGKV, Raipur (C.G)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_(Ficus_carica)_-_Cagliari%2C_Italy_2024-03-26.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“fig (Ficus carica L.) cv. Dinkar”
e0“The present experiment was carried out at Horticulture Farm, Department of Fruit Science, College of Agriculture, IGKV, Raipur (C.G)”
e3“Among bio-stimulants, PSB and Trichoderma virde were found to be the next best treatments in improving all the sprouting and shoot parameters in comparison to rest of the treatments”
The same questions in other papers
indole-3-butyric acid · survival · Ficus carica (common fig)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →indole-3-butyric acid · quality: postharvest · Ficus carica (common fig)Results agree
6 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →indole-3-butyric acid · growth · Ficus carica (common fig)Results agree
24 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
21 papers more in this group
See all 25 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.