Paper · 2024 · International Journal of Advanced Biochemistry Research

Studies on the effect of IBA and bio-stimulants on sprouting behavior and shoot growth of cuttings in fig (Ficus carica L.) cv. Dinkar

Surabhi Sharma; GL Sharma; Deepti Patel; et al.

10
claims
30
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The present experiment was carried out at Horticulture Farm, Department of Fruit Science, College of Agriculture, IGKV, Raipur (C.G) with the objective to study the effect of IBA and bio-stimulants on sprouting behavior and shoot growth of Fig cuttings. The experiment was replicated thrice using Complete Randomized Design. Significant effect of IBA and bio-stimulants were observed on sprouting and shoot parameters of cuttings. The earliest and maximum number of sprouted cuttings, sprouting percentage of cuttings, length of longest and shortest shoot, number of shoot and fresh and dry weight of shoot were recorded in IBA 2000 ppm (19.80 days, 8.65, 86.34, 6.83 cm, 3.90 cm,4.00,15.94 gm and 5.95 gm., respectively). The highest survival percentage of cuttings was recorded in IBA 3000 ppm. Among bio-stimulants, PSB and Trichoderma virde were found to be the next best treatments in improving all the sprouting and shoot parameters in comparison to rest of the treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IBA 2000 ppm gave the earliest sprouting of fig cuttings (19.80 days).

Taxon
Ficus caricaFicus caricat0
Material
cv. Dinkart0
Treatment
IBA 2000 ppme1
Outcome
sprouted cuttingse1
Direction
earlieste1
Value
19.80 dayse1
Setting
Horticulture Farm, Department of Fruit Science, College of Agriculture, IGKV, Raipur (C.G)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus carica
Ficus carica · TaxonRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“fig (Ficus carica L.) cv. Dinkar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“The present experiment was carried out at Horticulture Farm, Department of Fruit Science, College of Agriculture, IGKV, Raipur (C.G)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–132 · show in text ↑
e1

“The earliest and maximum number of sprouted cuttings, sprouting percentage of cuttings, length of longest and shortest shoot, number of shoot and fresh and dry weight of shoot were recorded in IBA 2000 ppm (19.80 days, 8.65, 86.34, 6.83 cm, 3.90 cm,4.00,15.94 gm and 5.95 gm., respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–721 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IBA 2000 ppm gave the maximum number of sprouted fig cuttings (8.65).

Taxon
Ficus caricaFicus caricat0
Material
cv. Dinkart0
Treatment
IBA 2000 ppme1
Outcome
number of sprouted cuttingse1
Direction
maximume1
Value
8.65e1
Setting
Horticulture Farm, Department of Fruit Science, College of Agriculture, IGKV, Raipur (C.G)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus carica
Ficus carica · TaxonRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“fig (Ficus carica L.) cv. Dinkar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“The present experiment was carried out at Horticulture Farm, Department of Fruit Science, College of Agriculture, IGKV, Raipur (C.G)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–132 · show in text ↑
e1

“The earliest and maximum number of sprouted cuttings, sprouting percentage of cuttings, length of longest and shortest shoot, number of shoot and fresh and dry weight of shoot were recorded in IBA 2000 ppm (19.80 days, 8.65, 86.34, 6.83 cm, 3.90 cm,4.00,15.94 gm and 5.95 gm., respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–721 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IBA 2000 ppm gave the maximum sprouting percentage of fig cuttings (86.34).

Taxon
Ficus caricaFicus caricat0
Material
cv. Dinkart0
Treatment
IBA 2000 ppme1
Outcome
sprouting percentage of cuttingse1
Direction
maximume1
Value
86.34e1
Setting
Horticulture Farm, Department of Fruit Science, College of Agriculture, IGKV, Raipur (C.G)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus carica
Ficus carica · TaxonRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“fig (Ficus carica L.) cv. Dinkar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“The present experiment was carried out at Horticulture Farm, Department of Fruit Science, College of Agriculture, IGKV, Raipur (C.G)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–132 · show in text ↑
e1

“The earliest and maximum number of sprouted cuttings, sprouting percentage of cuttings, length of longest and shortest shoot, number of shoot and fresh and dry weight of shoot were recorded in IBA 2000 ppm (19.80 days, 8.65, 86.34, 6.83 cm, 3.90 cm,4.00,15.94 gm and 5.95 gm., respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–721 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IBA 2000 ppm gave the longest shoot length of fig cuttings (6.83 cm).

Taxon
Ficus caricaFicus caricat0
Material
cv. Dinkart0
Treatment
IBA 2000 ppme1
Outcome
length of longeste1
Direction
longeste1
Value
6.83 cme1
Setting
Horticulture Farm, Department of Fruit Science, College of Agriculture, IGKV, Raipur (C.G)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus carica
Ficus carica · TaxonRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“fig (Ficus carica L.) cv. Dinkar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“The present experiment was carried out at Horticulture Farm, Department of Fruit Science, College of Agriculture, IGKV, Raipur (C.G)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–132 · show in text ↑
e1

“The earliest and maximum number of sprouted cuttings, sprouting percentage of cuttings, length of longest and shortest shoot, number of shoot and fresh and dry weight of shoot were recorded in IBA 2000 ppm (19.80 days, 8.65, 86.34, 6.83 cm, 3.90 cm,4.00,15.94 gm and 5.95 gm., respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–721 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IBA 2000 ppm gave the shortest shoot length of fig cuttings (3.90 cm).

Taxon
Ficus caricaFicus caricat0
Material
cv. Dinkart0
Treatment
IBA 2000 ppme1
Outcome
shortest shoote1
Direction
shorteste1
Value
3.90 cme1
Setting
Horticulture Farm, Department of Fruit Science, College of Agriculture, IGKV, Raipur (C.G)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus carica
Ficus carica · TaxonRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“fig (Ficus carica L.) cv. Dinkar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“The present experiment was carried out at Horticulture Farm, Department of Fruit Science, College of Agriculture, IGKV, Raipur (C.G)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–132 · show in text ↑
e1

“The earliest and maximum number of sprouted cuttings, sprouting percentage of cuttings, length of longest and shortest shoot, number of shoot and fresh and dry weight of shoot were recorded in IBA 2000 ppm (19.80 days, 8.65, 86.34, 6.83 cm, 3.90 cm,4.00,15.94 gm and 5.95 gm., respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–721 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IBA 2000 ppm gave the maximum number of shoots per fig cutting (4.00).

Taxon
Ficus caricaFicus caricat0
Material
cv. Dinkart0
Treatment
IBA 2000 ppme1
Outcome
number of shoote1
Direction
maximume1
Value
4.00e1
Setting
Horticulture Farm, Department of Fruit Science, College of Agriculture, IGKV, Raipur (C.G)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus carica
Ficus carica · TaxonRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“fig (Ficus carica L.) cv. Dinkar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“The present experiment was carried out at Horticulture Farm, Department of Fruit Science, College of Agriculture, IGKV, Raipur (C.G)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–132 · show in text ↑
e1

“The earliest and maximum number of sprouted cuttings, sprouting percentage of cuttings, length of longest and shortest shoot, number of shoot and fresh and dry weight of shoot were recorded in IBA 2000 ppm (19.80 days, 8.65, 86.34, 6.83 cm, 3.90 cm,4.00,15.94 gm and 5.95 gm., respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–721 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IBA 2000 ppm gave the maximum fresh shoot weight of fig cuttings (15.94 gm).

Taxon
Ficus caricaFicus caricat0
Material
cv. Dinkart0
Treatment
IBA 2000 ppme1
Outcome
fresh and dry weight of shoote1
Direction
maximume1
Value
15.94 gme1
Qualifier
freshe1
Setting
Horticulture Farm, Department of Fruit Science, College of Agriculture, IGKV, Raipur (C.G)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus carica
Ficus carica · TaxonRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“fig (Ficus carica L.) cv. Dinkar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“The present experiment was carried out at Horticulture Farm, Department of Fruit Science, College of Agriculture, IGKV, Raipur (C.G)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–132 · show in text ↑
e1

“The earliest and maximum number of sprouted cuttings, sprouting percentage of cuttings, length of longest and shortest shoot, number of shoot and fresh and dry weight of shoot were recorded in IBA 2000 ppm (19.80 days, 8.65, 86.34, 6.83 cm, 3.90 cm,4.00,15.94 gm and 5.95 gm., respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–721 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IBA 2000 ppm gave the maximum dry shoot weight of fig cuttings (5.95 gm).

Taxon
Ficus caricaFicus caricat0
Material
cv. Dinkart0
Treatment
IBA 2000 ppme1
Outcome
fresh and dry weight of shoote1
Direction
maximume1
Value
5.95 gme1
Qualifier
drye1
Setting
Horticulture Farm, Department of Fruit Science, College of Agriculture, IGKV, Raipur (C.G)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus carica
Ficus carica · TaxonRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“fig (Ficus carica L.) cv. Dinkar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“The present experiment was carried out at Horticulture Farm, Department of Fruit Science, College of Agriculture, IGKV, Raipur (C.G)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–132 · show in text ↑
e1

“The earliest and maximum number of sprouted cuttings, sprouting percentage of cuttings, length of longest and shortest shoot, number of shoot and fresh and dry weight of shoot were recorded in IBA 2000 ppm (19.80 days, 8.65, 86.34, 6.83 cm, 3.90 cm,4.00,15.94 gm and 5.95 gm., respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–721 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IBA 3000 ppm gave the highest survival percentage of fig cuttings.

Taxon
Ficus caricaFicus caricat0
Material
cv. Dinkart0
Treatment
IBA 3000 ppme2
Outcome
survival percentage of cuttingse2
Direction
higheste2
Setting
Horticulture Farm, Department of Fruit Science, College of Agriculture, IGKV, Raipur (C.G)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus carica
Ficus carica · TaxonRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“fig (Ficus carica L.) cv. Dinkar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“The present experiment was carried out at Horticulture Farm, Department of Fruit Science, College of Agriculture, IGKV, Raipur (C.G)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–132 · show in text ↑
e2

“The highest survival percentage of cuttings was recorded in IBA 3000 ppm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–795 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Among bio-stimulants, PSB and Trichoderma virde were the next best treatments for improving sprouting and shoot parameters of fig cuttings, compared with the rest of the treatments.

Taxon
Ficus caricaFicus caricat0
Material
cv. Dinkart0
Treatment
PSB and Trichoderma virdee3
Interactor
PSBe3symbiont
Second interactor
Trichoderma virdee3other
Outcome
sprouting and shoot parameterse3
Direction
next beste3
Comparator
rest of the treatmentse3
Setting
Horticulture Farm, Department of Fruit Science, College of Agriculture, IGKV, Raipur (C.G)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus carica
Ficus carica · TaxonRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“fig (Ficus carica L.) cv. Dinkar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“The present experiment was carried out at Horticulture Farm, Department of Fruit Science, College of Agriculture, IGKV, Raipur (C.G)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–132 · show in text ↑
e3

“Among bio-stimulants, PSB and Trichoderma virde were found to be the next best treatments in improving all the sprouting and shoot parameters in comparison to rest of the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–978 · show in text ↑

indole-3-butyric acid · survival · Ficus carica (common fig)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

indole-3-butyric acid · quality: postharvest · Ficus carica (common fig)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

indole-3-butyric acid · growth · Ficus carica (common fig)Results agree

25 papers: 25 positive, 0 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.