Paper · 2024 · IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science

Effect of Shading and Foliar Spraying with Nutrient Solution on Vegetative Growth and Yield Traits of Sweet Orange Trees cv. Local.

M. A. Oudah; R. M. Hamad

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract This study was conducted in one of the private orchards at the village of Al-Budhiyab, Ramadi district, Anbar governorate, in the spring season 2023, on sweet orange young trees cv. local with age 8 years. The study investigated the effect of shading with Saran and foliar application with nutrient solution under the commercial name (Brexil Duo) on the growth and yield traits. The experiment included two factors, the first three levels of shading [0% (without shading), 50%, and 75%] and the second three levels of nutrient solution (0, 3 and 6 g.L -1 ). The results showed that shading level of 50% resulted in a significant increase in most characteristics that studied viz. (leaf area, leaf dry matter, chlorophyll a and b, fruit set, fruit size, and fruit weight), compared to the shading treatments of 0% (without shading) and 75%. On the other hand, foliar application with nutrient solution (3 g.L -1 ) resulted in a significant increase in leaf dry matter content and chlorophyll b. while application of the nutrient solution Brexil Duo at concentration (6 g.L -1 ) resulted in a significant increase in leaf chlorophyll a and fruit set. Furthermore, there was no significant increase in leaf area, fruit size and fruit weight was observed at this concentration.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

50% shading significantly increased leaf area and leaf dry matter relative to 0% and 75% shading.

Taxon
sweet orangeCitrus sinensise1
Material
locale1
Treatment
shading level of 50%e0
Outcome
leaf area, leaf dry mattere0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
shading treatments of 0% (without shading) and 75%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that shading level of 50% resulted in a significant increase in most characteristics that studied viz. (leaf area, leaf dry matter, chlorophyll a and b, fruit set, fruit size, and fruit weight), compared to the shading treatments of 0% (without shading) and 75%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–848 · show in text ↑
e1

“on sweet orange young trees cv. local with age 8 years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 159–214 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

50% shading significantly increased chlorophyll a and b relative to 0% and 75% shading.

Taxon
sweet orangeCitrus sinensise1
Treatment
shading level of 50%e0
Outcome
chlorophyll a and be0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
shading treatments of 0% (without shading) and 75%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that shading level of 50% resulted in a significant increase in most characteristics that studied viz. (leaf area, leaf dry matter, chlorophyll a and b, fruit set, fruit size, and fruit weight), compared to the shading treatments of 0% (without shading) and 75%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–848 · show in text ↑
e1

“on sweet orange young trees cv. local with age 8 years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 159–214 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

50% shading significantly increased fruit set, size and weight relative to 0% and 75% shading.

Taxon
sweet orangeCitrus sinensise1
Treatment
shading level of 50%e0
Outcome
fruit set, fruit size, and fruit weighte0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
shading treatments of 0% (without shading) and 75%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that shading level of 50% resulted in a significant increase in most characteristics that studied viz. (leaf area, leaf dry matter, chlorophyll a and b, fruit set, fruit size, and fruit weight), compared to the shading treatments of 0% (without shading) and 75%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–848 · show in text ↑
e1

“on sweet orange young trees cv. local with age 8 years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 159–214 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient solution at 3 g.L -1 significantly increased leaf dry matter and chlorophyll b.

Taxon
sweet orangeCitrus sinensise1
Treatment
foliar application with nutrient solution (3 g.L -1 )e0
Outcome
leaf dry matter content and chlorophyll be0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On the other hand, foliar application with nutrient solution (3 g.L -1 ) resulted in a significant increase in leaf dry matter content and chlorophyll b.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–1002 · show in text ↑
e1

“on sweet orange young trees cv. local with age 8 years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 159–214 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Brexil Duo at 6 g.L -1 significantly increased leaf chlorophyll a and fruit set.

Taxon
sweet orangeCitrus sinensise1
Treatment
application of the nutrient solution Brexil Duo at concentration (6 g.L -1 )e0
Outcome
leaf chlorophyll a and fruit sete0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while application of the nutrient solution Brexil Duo at concentration (6 g.L -1 ) resulted in a significant increase in leaf chlorophyll a and fruit set.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1157 · show in text ↑
e1

“on sweet orange young trees cv. local with age 8 years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 159–214 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Brexil Duo at 6 g.L -1 did not significantly increase leaf area, fruit size or fruit weight.

Taxon
sweet orangeCitrus sinensise2
Treatment
application of the nutrient solution Brexil Duo at concentration (6 g.L -1 )e1
Outcome
leaf area, fruit size and fruit weighte0
Direction
no significant increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Furthermore, there was no significant increase in leaf area, fruit size and fruit weight was observed at this concentration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1158–1282 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of the nutrient solution Brexil Duo at concentration (6 g.L -1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1009–1085 · show in text ↑
e2

“on sweet orange young trees cv. local with age 8 years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 159–214 · show in text ↑

shade · yield · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Results differ

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

application · physiology: pigments · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 18 positive, 1 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

shade · physiology: pigments · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

shade · growth · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.