Paper · 2024 · European Journal of Natural History

INVESTIGATION OF THE RESISTANCE OF STRAWBERRY GENOTYPES TO STRESS FACTORS THROUGH VARIOUS DIAGNOSTIC METHODS

A.F. Gadzhieva; G.S. Medzhidova; Z.N. Guseynzade; et al.

14
claims
20
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The article uses various diagnostic methods to investigate the salt and drought resistance of five strawberry genotypes (Reddekut, Carmen, Fakhraly F/14, Barda B/13, XQI 1/18).The water-holding capacity, one of the diagnostic indicators of resistance, in the studied samples ranges from 66% to 57%, whereas the total water content in the leaves varies from 77% to 71%.Based on the results obtained, the genotypes of the strawberry varieties Reddekut and Carmen, which exhibit lower water loss, can be classified as resistant.Another diagnostic method involves assessing the resistance of plants to stress factors by measuring changes in the amount of chlorophyll (a + b) under their influence.The Reddekut variety and the strawberry form XQI/18 demonstrated an increase in chlorophyll content under drought conditions by 8.16% and under salinity by 18.21%.According to the research results, these strawberry samples can be considered highly resistant to both salinity and drought.It was determined that exposure to stress factors disrupts metabolic processes, resulting in the accumulation of proline and various other amino acids without being consumed, thereby increasing their levels compared to the control.Consequently, the amino acid proline is utilized as a biochemical marker of resistance.In our study, following exposure to stress factors, the amount of the amino acid proline increased in all strawberry varieties and forms.However, in one form (Fakhraly F/14), a decrease in this indicator was observed compared to the control under drought conditions.This fact can be associated with the consumption of the proline reserves that the plant utilizes when resisting stress.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water-holding capacity in the five strawberry genotypes ranged from 66% to 57%.

Taxon
STRAWBERRYFragaria ×ananassat0
Outcome
water-holding capacitye1
Value
66% to 57%e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The water-holding capacity, one of the diagnostic indicators of resistance, in the studied samples ranges from 66% to 57%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 176–297 · show in text ↑
t0

“STRAWBERRY GENOTYPES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–55 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total water content in the leaves of the five strawberry genotypes varied from 77% to 71%.

Taxon
STRAWBERRYFragaria ×ananassat0
Organ / stage
leavese1
Outcome
total water contente1
Value
77% to 71%e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the total water content in the leaves varies from 77% to 71%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 307–367 · show in text ↑
t0

“STRAWBERRY GENOTYPES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–55 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strawberry genotype Reddekut, with lower water loss, can be classified as resistant.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae1
Material
Reddekute1
Outcome
classified as resistante1
Qualifier
lower water losse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the genotypes of the strawberry varieties Reddekut and Carmen, which exhibit lower water loss, can be classified as resistant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–524 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strawberry genotype Carmen, with lower water loss, can be classified as resistant.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae1
Material
Carmene1
Outcome
classified as resistante1
Qualifier
lower water losse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the genotypes of the strawberry varieties Reddekut and Carmen, which exhibit lower water loss, can be classified as resistant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–524 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll content of the Reddekut strawberry variety increased by 8.16% under drought.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae1
Material
Reddekut varietye1
Treatment
drought conditionse1
Outcome
chlorophyll contente1
Direction
increasee1
Value
8.16%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The Reddekut variety and the strawberry form XQI/18 demonstrated an increase in chlorophyll content under drought conditions by 8.16% and under salinity by 18.21%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–855 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll content of the strawberry form XQI/18 increased by 8.16% under drought.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae1
Material
strawberry form XQI/18e1
Treatment
drought conditionse1
Outcome
chlorophyll contente1
Direction
increasee1
Value
8.16%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The Reddekut variety and the strawberry form XQI/18 demonstrated an increase in chlorophyll content under drought conditions by 8.16% and under salinity by 18.21%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–855 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll content of the Reddekut strawberry variety increased by 18.21% under salinity.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae1
Material
Reddekut varietye1
Treatment
salinitye1
Outcome
chlorophyll contente1
Direction
increasee1
Value
18.21%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The Reddekut variety and the strawberry form XQI/18 demonstrated an increase in chlorophyll content under drought conditions by 8.16% and under salinity by 18.21%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–855 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll content of the strawberry form XQI/18 increased by 18.21% under salinity.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae1
Material
strawberry form XQI/18e1
Treatment
salinitye1
Outcome
chlorophyll contente1
Direction
increasee1
Value
18.21%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The Reddekut variety and the strawberry form XQI/18 demonstrated an increase in chlorophyll content under drought conditions by 8.16% and under salinity by 18.21%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–855 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The strawberry samples Reddekut and XQI/18 can be considered highly resistant to both salinity and drought.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae1
Outcome
highly resistant to both salinity and droughte1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“these strawberry samples can be considered highly resistant to both salinity and drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–979 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Exposure to stress factors disrupted metabolism, with proline and other amino acids accumulating and their levels increasing compared with control in strawberry.

Taxon
STRAWBERRYFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
stress factorse1
Outcome
accumulation of proline and various other amino acidse1
Direction
increasinge1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“exposure to stress factors disrupts metabolic processes, resulting in the accumulation of proline and various other amino acids without being consumed, thereby increasing their levels compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1210 · show in text ↑
t0

“STRAWBERRY GENOTYPES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After exposure to stress factors the amount of proline increased in all strawberry varieties and forms.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae1
Treatment
stress factorse1
Outcome
amount of the amino acid prolinee1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“following exposure to stress factors, the amount of the amino acid proline increased in all strawberry varieties and forms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1312–1434 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the strawberry form Fakhraly F/14 the proline indicator decreased compared with the control under drought.

Taxon
STRAWBERRYFragaria ×ananassat0
Material
Fakhraly F/14e1
Treatment
drought conditionse1
Outcome
this indicatore1
Direction
decreasee1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“in one form (Fakhraly F/14), a decrease in this indicator was observed compared to the control under drought conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1444–1563 · show in text ↑
t0

“STRAWBERRY GENOTYPES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–55 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The decrease in proline in Fakhraly F/14 under drought can be associated with consumption of proline reserves used by the plant when resisting stress.

Taxon
STRAWBERRYFragaria ×ananassat0
Compound
proline reservese1
Outcome
This facte1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“This fact can be associated with the consumption of the proline reserves that the plant utilizes when resisting stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1564–1682 · show in text ↑
t0

“STRAWBERRY GENOTYPES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–55 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that proline is used as a biochemical marker of resistance in strawberry.

Taxon
STRAWBERRYFragaria ×ananassat0
Compound
prolinee1
Outcome
biochemical marker of resistancee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the amino acid proline is utilized as a biochemical marker of resistance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1225–1297 · show in text ↑
t0

“STRAWBERRY GENOTYPES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–55 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: pigments · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results differ

5 papers: 1 positive, 4 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

salinity · physiology: pigments · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results differ

8 papers: 1 positive, 7 negative or no effect

7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.