Abstract
The article uses various diagnostic methods to investigate the salt and drought resistance of five strawberry genotypes (Reddekut, Carmen, Fakhraly F/14, Barda B/13, XQI 1/18).The water-holding capacity, one of the diagnostic indicators of resistance, in the studied samples ranges from 66% to 57%, whereas the total water content in the leaves varies from 77% to 71%.Based on the results obtained, the genotypes of the strawberry varieties Reddekut and Carmen, which exhibit lower water loss, can be classified as resistant.Another diagnostic method involves assessing the resistance of plants to stress factors by measuring changes in the amount of chlorophyll (a + b) under their influence.The Reddekut variety and the strawberry form XQI/18 demonstrated an increase in chlorophyll content under drought conditions by 8.16% and under salinity by 18.21%.According to the research results, these strawberry samples can be considered highly resistant to both salinity and drought.It was determined that exposure to stress factors disrupts metabolic processes, resulting in the accumulation of proline and various other amino acids without being consumed, thereby increasing their levels compared to the control.Consequently, the amino acid proline is utilized as a biochemical marker of resistance.In our study, following exposure to stress factors, the amount of the amino acid proline increased in all strawberry varieties and forms.However, in one form (Fakhraly F/14), a decrease in this indicator was observed compared to the control under drought conditions.This fact can be associated with the consumption of the proline reserves that the plant utilizes when resisting stress.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 14
Claim · model-written summary
Water-holding capacity in the five strawberry genotypes ranged from 66% to 57%.
- Taxon
- STRAWBERRY
Fragaria ×ananassat0 - Outcome
- water-holding capacitye1
- Value
- 66% to 57%e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_single2.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e1“The water-holding capacity, one of the diagnostic indicators of resistance, in the studied samples ranges from 66% to 57%”
t0“STRAWBERRY GENOTYPES”
Claim · model-written summary
Total water content in the leaves of the five strawberry genotypes varied from 77% to 71%.
- Taxon
- STRAWBERRY
Fragaria ×ananassat0 - Organ / stage
- leavese1
- Outcome
- total water contente1
- Value
- 77% to 71%e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_single2.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e1“the total water content in the leaves varies from 77% to 71%”
t0“STRAWBERRY GENOTYPES”
Claim · model-written summary
Strawberry genotype Reddekut, with lower water loss, can be classified as resistant.
- Taxon
- strawberry
Fragaria ×ananassae1 - Material
- Reddekute1
- Outcome
- classified as resistante1
- Qualifier
- lower water losse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_single2.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e1“the genotypes of the strawberry varieties Reddekut and Carmen, which exhibit lower water loss, can be classified as resistant”
Claim · model-written summary
Strawberry genotype Carmen, with lower water loss, can be classified as resistant.
- Taxon
- strawberry
Fragaria ×ananassae1 - Material
- Carmene1
- Outcome
- classified as resistante1
- Qualifier
- lower water losse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_single2.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e1“the genotypes of the strawberry varieties Reddekut and Carmen, which exhibit lower water loss, can be classified as resistant”
Claim · model-written summary
Chlorophyll content of the Reddekut strawberry variety increased by 8.16% under drought.
- Taxon
- strawberry
Fragaria ×ananassae1 - Material
- Reddekut varietye1
- Treatment
- drought conditionse1
- Outcome
- chlorophyll contente1
- Direction
- increasee1
- Value
- 8.16%e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_single2.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e1“The Reddekut variety and the strawberry form XQI/18 demonstrated an increase in chlorophyll content under drought conditions by 8.16% and under salinity by 18.21%”
Claim · model-written summary
Chlorophyll content of the strawberry form XQI/18 increased by 8.16% under drought.
- Taxon
- strawberry
Fragaria ×ananassae1 - Material
- strawberry form XQI/18e1
- Treatment
- drought conditionse1
- Outcome
- chlorophyll contente1
- Direction
- increasee1
- Value
- 8.16%e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_single2.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e1“The Reddekut variety and the strawberry form XQI/18 demonstrated an increase in chlorophyll content under drought conditions by 8.16% and under salinity by 18.21%”
Claim · model-written summary
Chlorophyll content of the Reddekut strawberry variety increased by 18.21% under salinity.
- Taxon
- strawberry
Fragaria ×ananassae1 - Material
- Reddekut varietye1
- Treatment
- salinitye1
- Outcome
- chlorophyll contente1
- Direction
- increasee1
- Value
- 18.21%e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_single2.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e1“The Reddekut variety and the strawberry form XQI/18 demonstrated an increase in chlorophyll content under drought conditions by 8.16% and under salinity by 18.21%”
Claim · model-written summary
Chlorophyll content of the strawberry form XQI/18 increased by 18.21% under salinity.
- Taxon
- strawberry
Fragaria ×ananassae1 - Material
- strawberry form XQI/18e1
- Treatment
- salinitye1
- Outcome
- chlorophyll contente1
- Direction
- increasee1
- Value
- 18.21%e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_single2.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e1“The Reddekut variety and the strawberry form XQI/18 demonstrated an increase in chlorophyll content under drought conditions by 8.16% and under salinity by 18.21%”
Claim · model-written summary
The strawberry samples Reddekut and XQI/18 can be considered highly resistant to both salinity and drought.
- Taxon
- strawberry
Fragaria ×ananassae1 - Outcome
- highly resistant to both salinity and droughte1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_single2.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e1“these strawberry samples can be considered highly resistant to both salinity and drought”
Claim · model-written summary
Exposure to stress factors disrupted metabolism, with proline and other amino acids accumulating and their levels increasing compared with control in strawberry.
- Taxon
- STRAWBERRY
Fragaria ×ananassat0 - Treatment
- stress factorse1
- Outcome
- accumulation of proline and various other amino acidse1
- Direction
- increasinge1
- Comparator
- controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_single2.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e1“exposure to stress factors disrupts metabolic processes, resulting in the accumulation of proline and various other amino acids without being consumed, thereby increasing their levels compared to the control”
t0“STRAWBERRY GENOTYPES”
Claim · model-written summary
After exposure to stress factors the amount of proline increased in all strawberry varieties and forms.
- Taxon
- strawberry
Fragaria ×ananassae1 - Treatment
- stress factorse1
- Outcome
- amount of the amino acid prolinee1
- Direction
- increasede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_single2.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e1“following exposure to stress factors, the amount of the amino acid proline increased in all strawberry varieties and forms”
Claim · model-written summary
In the strawberry form Fakhraly F/14 the proline indicator decreased compared with the control under drought.
- Taxon
- STRAWBERRY
Fragaria ×ananassat0 - Material
- Fakhraly F/14e1
- Treatment
- drought conditionse1
- Outcome
- this indicatore1
- Direction
- decreasee1
- Comparator
- controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_single2.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e1“in one form (Fakhraly F/14), a decrease in this indicator was observed compared to the control under drought conditions”
t0“STRAWBERRY GENOTYPES”
Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in proline in Fakhraly F/14 under drought can be associated with consumption of proline reserves used by the plant when resisting stress.
- Taxon
- STRAWBERRY
Fragaria ×ananassat0 - Compound
- proline reservese1
- Outcome
- This facte1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_single2.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e1“This fact can be associated with the consumption of the proline reserves that the plant utilizes when resisting stress”
t0“STRAWBERRY GENOTYPES”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors conclude that proline is used as a biochemical marker of resistance in strawberry.
- Taxon
- STRAWBERRY
Fragaria ×ananassat0 - Compound
- prolinee1
- Outcome
- biochemical marker of resistancee1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_single2.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e1“the amino acid proline is utilized as a biochemical marker of resistance”
t0“STRAWBERRY GENOTYPES”
The same questions in other papers
drought · physiology: pigments · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results differ
4 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →salinity · physiology: pigments · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results differ
7 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- no effect
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.