Paper · 2020 · Journal of Horticultural Science

Phytochemical and Quality Attributes of Strawberry Fruit under Osmotic Stress of Nutrient Solution and Foliar Application of Putrescine and Salicylic Acid

Masoud Haghshenas; Mohammad Javad Nazarideljou; Akbar Shokoohian

15
claims
30
verbatim quotes
12
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The moderating role of salicylic acid (SA) and putrescine (PUS) as plant growth regulators (PGRs), on the growth parameters and phytochemical and qualitative characteristics of strawberry fruit 'Selva' under osmotic stress was investigated under soilless culture. The osmotic potential (salinity) of the nutrient solution containing different NaCl concentrations (0, 7.5, 15, 30 and 45 mM) and foliar application of PUS (0 and 1.5 mM) and SA (0 and 1.5 mM) were studied. The results showed a significant decrease in plant leaf area (79.6%), total chlorophyll content (48%), fruit yield (73.5%), leaf relative water content (33%), total protein (33.4%), total phenol (7.8%), and vitamin C content (24.5%) under osmotic stress. Moreover, peroxidase (POD) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) enzymes activity, leaf ion leakage, and soluble carbohydrate and proline content increased significantly under osmotic stress. Application of PGRs had a significant effect on all the studied traits (except for SOD activity). Interactive effects of salinity and PGRs were significant on all the traits except for leaf ion leakage, POD activity, soluble carbohydrates, and protein. The highest total phenol and vitamin C contents were obtained with 15 mM salinity along with foliar application of PGRs. In conclusion, foliar application of PUS and SA ameliorate negative effects of salt stress on growth, yield, and quality of strawberry fruit.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Osmotic stress significantly reduced strawberry leaf area by 79.6%.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
osmotic stresse0
Outcome
plant leaf areae0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
79.6%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed a significant decrease in plant leaf area (79.6%), total chlorophyll content (48%), fruit yield (73.5%), leaf relative water content (33%), total protein (33.4%), total phenol (7.8%), and vitamin C content (24.5%) under osmotic stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 471–725 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Osmotic stress significantly reduced total chlorophyll content by 48%.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
osmotic stresse0
Outcome
total chlorophyll contente0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
48%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a significant decrease in plant leaf area (79.6%), total chlorophyll content (48%), fruit yield (73.5%), leaf relative water content (33%), total protein (33.4%), total phenol (7.8%), and vitamin C content (24.5%) under osmotic stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 490–725 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Osmotic stress significantly reduced fruit yield by 73.5%.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
osmotic stresse0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
73.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a significant decrease in plant leaf area (79.6%), total chlorophyll content (48%), fruit yield (73.5%), leaf relative water content (33%), total protein (33.4%), total phenol (7.8%), and vitamin C content (24.5%) under osmotic stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 490–725 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Osmotic stress significantly reduced leaf relative water content by 33%.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
osmotic stresse0
Outcome
leaf relative water contente0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
33%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a significant decrease in plant leaf area (79.6%), total chlorophyll content (48%), fruit yield (73.5%), leaf relative water content (33%), total protein (33.4%), total phenol (7.8%), and vitamin C content (24.5%) under osmotic stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 490–725 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Osmotic stress significantly reduced total protein by 33.4%.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
osmotic stresse0
Outcome
total proteine0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
33.4%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a significant decrease in plant leaf area (79.6%), total chlorophyll content (48%), fruit yield (73.5%), leaf relative water content (33%), total protein (33.4%), total phenol (7.8%), and vitamin C content (24.5%) under osmotic stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 490–725 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Osmotic stress significantly reduced total phenol by 7.8%.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
osmotic stresse0
Outcome
total phenole0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
7.8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a significant decrease in plant leaf area (79.6%), total chlorophyll content (48%), fruit yield (73.5%), leaf relative water content (33%), total protein (33.4%), total phenol (7.8%), and vitamin C content (24.5%) under osmotic stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 490–725 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Osmotic stress significantly reduced vitamin C content by 24.5%.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
osmotic stresse0
Outcome
vitamin C contente0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
24.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a significant decrease in plant leaf area (79.6%), total chlorophyll content (48%), fruit yield (73.5%), leaf relative water content (33%), total protein (33.4%), total phenol (7.8%), and vitamin C content (24.5%) under osmotic stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 490–725 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Osmotic stress significantly increased POD and SOD enzyme activity.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
osmotic stresse0
Outcome
peroxidase (POD) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) enzymes activitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“peroxidase (POD) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) enzymes activity, leaf ion leakage, and soluble carbohydrate and proline content increased significantly under osmotic stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–910 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Osmotic stress significantly increased leaf ion leakage.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
osmotic stresse0
Outcome
leaf ion leakagee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“leaf ion leakage, and soluble carbohydrate and proline content increased significantly under osmotic stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–910 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Osmotic stress significantly increased soluble carbohydrate and proline content.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
osmotic stresse0
Outcome
soluble carbohydrate and proline contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soluble carbohydrate and proline content increased significantly under osmotic stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–910 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar plant growth regulators significantly affected all studied traits except SOD activity.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
foliar application of PUS (0 and 1.5 mM) and SA (0 and 1.5 mM)e1
Outcome
all the studied traitse0
Qualifier
except for SOD activitye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of PGRs had a significant effect on all the studied traits (except for SOD activity).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1008 · show in text ↑
e1

“foliar application of PUS (0 and 1.5 mM) and SA (0 and 1.5 mM)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 394–456 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–50 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity and plant growth regulator interactions were significant for all studied traits except four named traits.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
salinity and PGRse0
Outcome
all the traitse0
Qualifier
except for leaf ion leakage, POD activity, soluble carbohydrates, and proteine0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Interactive effects of salinity and PGRs were significant on all the traits except for leaf ion leakage, POD activity, soluble carbohydrates, and protein.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1009–1163 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total phenol content was highest under 15 mM salinity with foliar plant growth regulators.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
15 mM salinity along with foliar application of PGRse0
Outcome
total phenole0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest total phenol and vitamin C contents were obtained with 15 mM salinity along with foliar application of PGRs.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1164–1284 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vitamin C content was highest under 15 mM salinity with foliar plant growth regulators.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
15 mM salinity along with foliar application of PGRse0
Outcome
vitamin C contentse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest total phenol and vitamin C contents were obtained with 15 mM salinity along with foliar application of PGRs.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1164–1284 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–50 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that foliar putrescine and salicylic acid ameliorate salinity effects on strawberry growth, yield and fruit quality.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Treatment
foliar application of PUS and SAe0
Outcome
growth, yield, and quality of strawberry fruite0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar application of PUS and SA ameliorate negative effects of salt stress on growth, yield, and quality of strawberry fruit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1300–1426 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: pigments · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results differ

5 papers: 1 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

drought · quality: phytochemicals · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results differ

6 papers: 1 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

drought · quality: protein · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

drought · physiology: water · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 2 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

drought · yield · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 2 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

drought · growth · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 3 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

application · quality: phytochemicals · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 18 positive, 1 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

drought · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.