Paper · 2024 · New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science

Agronomic biofortification of tomatoes with iron enhances growth, yield and quality

Nabeel Ahmad Ikram; Abdul Ghaffar; Asif Ali Khan; et al.

9
claims
24
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT Agronomic biofortification with iron (Fe) in tomatoes has emerged as a promising strategy to combat global iron deficiency. Iron is essential for human health and plays a critical role in the growth and development of crops. This study aimed to determine the optimal dose of Fe for tomato biofortification and assess its impact on its growth, yield and quality attributes, particularly the fruit’s Fe content. A greenhouse experiment was conducted using tomato hybrids Sandal and Sahel, applying Fe foliar treatments at concentrations of 0, 1, 3, 6 and 9 mM Fe per plant. The results demonstrated that foliar application of 6 mM Fe significantly enhanced the tomato’s growth, yield and quality, while markedly increasing the fruit’s Fe content to 30.07 and 34.1 mg kg −1 in Sandal and Sahel hybrids, respectively. These values were substantially higher than those of the control treatment with Fe contents of 14.77 and 15.0 mg kg −1 , respectively. However, higher doses of Fe (> 6 mM Fe per plant) showed adverse effects on growth, yield, and quality. Foliar application of iron proved an effective and economical solution, readily integrated into commercial tomato production, offering farmers a practical method to produce Fe‐biofortified tomatoes and combat iron deficiency‐linked malnutrition.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar 6 mM Fe significantly enhanced tomato growth.

Treatment
foliar application of 6 mM Fee0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
0t0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar application of 6 mM Fe significantly enhanced the tomato’s growth, yield and quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–702 · show in text ↑
t0

“0, 1, 3, 6 and 9 mM Fe per plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–579 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar 6 mM Fe significantly enhanced tomato yield.

Treatment
foliar application of 6 mM Fee0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
0t0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar application of 6 mM Fe significantly enhanced the tomato’s growth, yield and quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–702 · show in text ↑
t0

“0, 1, 3, 6 and 9 mM Fe per plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–579 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar 6 mM Fe significantly enhanced tomato quality.

Treatment
foliar application of 6 mM Fee0
Outcome
qualitye0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
0t0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar application of 6 mM Fe significantly enhanced the tomato’s growth, yield and quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–702 · show in text ↑
t0

“0, 1, 3, 6 and 9 mM Fe per plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–579 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 6 mM Fe, Sandal fruit iron content reached 30.07 mg kg −1, above the control value of 14.77 mg kg −1.

Material
Sandale0
Treatment
6 mM Fee1
Outcome
fruit’s Fe contente0
Direction
markedly increasinge0
Value
30.07e0
Qualifier
14.77e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while markedly increasing the fruit’s Fe content to 30.07 and 34.1 mg kg −1 in Sandal and Sahel hybrids, respectively. These values were substantially higher than those of the control treatment with Fe contents of 14.77 and 15.0 mg kg −1 , respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–957 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–38 · show in text ↑
t1

“tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–38 · show in text ↑
e1

“foliar application of 6 mM Fe significantly enhanced the tomato’s growth, yield and quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–702 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 6 mM Fe, Sahel fruit iron content reached 34.1 mg kg −1, above the control value of 15.0 mg kg −1.

Material
Sahele0
Treatment
6 mM Fee1
Outcome
fruit’s Fe contente0
Direction
markedly increasinge0
Value
34.1 mg kg −1e0
Qualifier
15.0e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while markedly increasing the fruit’s Fe content to 30.07 and 34.1 mg kg −1 in Sandal and Sahel hybrids, respectively. These values were substantially higher than those of the control treatment with Fe contents of 14.77 and 15.0 mg kg −1 , respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–957 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–38 · show in text ↑
t1

“tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–38 · show in text ↑
e1

“foliar application of 6 mM Fe significantly enhanced the tomato’s growth, yield and quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–702 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Iron above 6 mM per plant adversely affected tomato growth.

Treatment
higher doses of Fe (> 6 mM Fe per plant)e0
Outcome
growthe0
Comparator
6 mM Fee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher doses of Fe (> 6 mM Fe per plant) showed adverse effects on growth, yield, and quality.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1061 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–38 · show in text ↑
t1

“tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Iron above 6 mM per plant adversely affected tomato yield.

Treatment
higher doses of Fe (> 6 mM Fe per plant)e0
Outcome
yielde0
Comparator
6 mM Fee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher doses of Fe (> 6 mM Fe per plant) showed adverse effects on growth, yield, and quality.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1061 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–38 · show in text ↑
t1

“tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Iron above 6 mM per plant adversely affected tomato quality.

Treatment
higher doses of Fe (> 6 mM Fe per plant)e0
Outcome
qualitye0
Comparator
6 mM Fee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher doses of Fe (> 6 mM Fe per plant) showed adverse effects on growth, yield, and quality.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1061 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–38 · show in text ↑
t1

“tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–38 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar iron was presented as an effective economical commercial biofortification approach.

Outcome
Foliar application of iron proved an effective and economical solutione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar application of iron proved an effective and economical solution, readily integrated into commercial tomato production, offering farmers a practical method to produce Fe‐biofortified tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1259 · show in text ↑

iron atom · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

30 papers: 27 positive, 3 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

iron atom · quality: general · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

iron atom · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 21 positive, 2 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

iron atom · nutrient: content · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 28 positive, 3 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

application · quality: general · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

46 papers: 40 positive, 6 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

application · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

253 papers: 225 positive, 28 negative or no effect

224 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

249 papers more in this group

See all 253 papers →

application · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

296 papers: 261 positive, 35 negative or no effect

260 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

292 papers more in this group

See all 296 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.