Paper · 2024 · Journal of Environmental Biology

Zinc fortification and legume incorporation in forage based cropping systems: Implications for yield and nutrient dynamics

N.H. Mir; B.A. Alie; S. Ahmad; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the synergistic effects of legume intercropping and zinc fortification on forage yield, and plant and soil nutrient dynamics. Methodology: The experiment was laid out in a Factorial Randomized Block Design. Treatment combinations included five cropping systems, i.e., sole maize, sole cowpea, sole soybean, maize + cowpea (2:1), maize + soybean (2:1) and three zinc levels; Zn0= control or no zinc application, Zn1 = 20 kg ZnSO4 ha-1 (basal soil application) and Zn2 = 20 kg ZnSO4 ha-1 (basal soil application) + 0.5% ZnSO4 sprayed twice (30 DAS and 50 DAS). Results: Sole maize recorded highest dry matter (11938 kg ha-1) yield. Soil + foliar zinc application (Zn2) recorded an increase of 37.93 % increase in dry matter yield over control (Zn0). Maize + legumes recorded higher nitrogen uptake. There was an overall increase (122.34%) in zinc uptake from Zn0 to Zn2. Soil + foliar applied Zn increased ZnUE by 27.60 % (619.14 kg) over soil applied Zn (485.19 kg). Zn application increased Zn values of soil to 0.50 ppm with soil application and 0.56 ppm with soil + foliar application from the initial value of 0.36 ppm. Interpretation: Intercropping of legumes and application of 20 kg ZnSO4 as basal soil application plus two foliar applications of 0.5% ZnSO4 at 30 and 50 days after sowing significantly increased forage yield, nutrient uptake and enhanced soil zinc levels. Key words: Cropping systems, Intercropping, Legumes, Nutrient dynamics, Yield, Zn fortification

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole maize had the highest dry matter yield at 11938 kg ha-1.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Sole maizee0
Outcome
dry mattere0
Direction
higheste0
Value
11938 kg ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sole maize recorded highest dry matter (11938 kg ha-1) yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–646 · show in text ↑
t0

“sole maize, sole cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 285–308 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil and foliar zinc raised dry matter yield 37.93 % over control.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Soil + foliar zinc application (Zn2)e0
Outcome
dry matter yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
37.93 %e0
Comparator
control (Zn0)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil + foliar zinc application (Zn2) recorded an increase of 37.93 % increase in dry matter yield over control (Zn0).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–764 · show in text ↑
t0

“sole maize, sole cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 285–308 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize with legumes had higher nitrogen uptake.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Maize + legumese0
Outcome
nitrogen uptakee0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maize + legumes recorded higher nitrogen uptake.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–813 · show in text ↑
t0

“sole maize, sole cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 285–308 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc uptake rose 122.34% from Zn0 to Zn2.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Zn2e0
Outcome
zinc uptakee0
Direction
increasee0
Value
122.34%e0
Comparator
Zn0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was an overall increase (122.34%) in zinc uptake from Zn0 to Zn2.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 814–885 · show in text ↑
t0

“sole maize, sole cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 285–308 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil plus foliar zinc increased ZnUE 27.60 % over soil zinc alone.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Soil + foliar applied Zne0
Outcome
ZnUEe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
27.60 %e0
Qualifier
485.19 kge0
Comparator
soil applied Zne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil + foliar applied Zn increased ZnUE by 27.60 % (619.14 kg) over soil applied Zn (485.19 kg).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–982 · show in text ↑
t0

“sole maize, sole cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 285–308 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil zinc application increased soil zinc to 0.50 ppm from 0.36 ppm.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
soil applicatione0
Outcome
Zn values of soile0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.50 ppme0
Comparator
initial value of 0.36 ppme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Zn application increased Zn values of soil to 0.50 ppm with soil application and 0.56 ppm with soil + foliar application from the initial value of 0.36 ppm.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1139 · show in text ↑
t0

“sole maize, sole cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 285–308 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil plus foliar zinc increased soil zinc to 0.56 ppm from 0.36 ppm.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
soil + foliar applicatione0
Outcome
Zn values of soile0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.56 ppme0
Comparator
initial value of 0.36 ppme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Zn application increased Zn values of soil to 0.50 ppm with soil application and 0.56 ppm with soil + foliar application from the initial value of 0.36 ppm.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1139 · show in text ↑
t0

“sole maize, sole cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 285–308 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

441 papers: 391 positive, 50 negative or no effect

390 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

437 papers more in this group

See all 441 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

161 papers: 151 positive, 10 negative or no effect

150 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

157 papers more in this group

See all 161 papers →

application · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

629 papers: 575 positive, 54 negative or no effect

574 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction · 12 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

625 papers more in this group

See all 629 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.