Paper · 2024 · Cryoletters

The Optimal Moisture Content for Cryopreservation of Longjing Tea Seeds

Danping Song; Ganesh K. Jaganathan; Jiajin Li; et al.

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Most plant species produce seeds that can be dried to c. 3-7% moisture content, i.e., orthodox, and successfully stored in liquid nitrogen. However, tea seeds are often described as recalcitrant, i.e., they die when to lower moisture levels safe for cryopreservation. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we investigated the tolerance to desiccation and freezing of Longjing tea (Camellia sinensis) seeds and analyzed the reason behind seed mortality during desiccation and cryopreservation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed the desiccation capacity of tea seeds from Hangzhou, China and subjected the desiccated seeds to programmed cooling and thermal analysis using differential scanning calorimeter (DSC). Subsequently, we used the exotherms to determine the frozen and unfrozen water. We analyzed seed germination and seedling establishment at different water content after storing seeds in liquid nitrogen and correlated the survival with the bound and unbound water. RESULTS: Results showed that the seeds could tolerate drying to 7.9 % moisture content without significant viability loss. Moreover, the germination percentage declined sharply after cryopreservation, and the lowest moisture content at which a normal seedling could develop was 11.3+/-1 %, although seeds dried to lower MC did germinate but did not grow into the seedling phase. CONCLUSION: Longjing tea seeds used in this study were neither orthodox nor recalcitrant. We show that the interaction between lipids and freezable water in seeds may lead to the cryoinjury. https://doi.org/10.54680/fr24610110612.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tea seeds tolerated drying to 7.9% moisture content without significant viability loss.

Taxon
teat0
Treatment
drying to 7.9 % moisture contente0
Outcome
viability losse0
Direction
without significant viability losse0
Value
7.9 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the seeds could tolerate drying to 7.9 % moisture content without significant viability loss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1097 · show in text ↑
t0

“Longjing Tea Seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tea seed germination declined sharply after cryopreservation.

Taxon
teat0
Treatment
cryopreservatione0
Outcome
germination percentagee0
Direction
declined sharplye0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the germination percentage declined sharply after cryopreservation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1175 · show in text ↑
t0

“Longjing Tea Seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–71 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The lowest moisture content supporting normal tea seedling development was 11.3+/-1 %.

Taxon
teat0
Outcome
normal seedling could develope0
Direction
loweste0
Value
11.3+/-1 %e0

Verbatim

e0

“the lowest moisture content at which a normal seedling could develop was 11.3+/-1 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1264 · show in text ↑
t0

“Longjing Tea Seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–71 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tea seeds dried to lower moisture content germinated but failed to reach the seedling phase.

Taxon
teat0
Outcome
did germinate but did not grow into the seedling phasee0
Qualifier
lower MCe0

Verbatim

e0

“seeds dried to lower MC did germinate but did not grow into the seedling phase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1353 · show in text ↑
t0

“Longjing Tea Seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–71 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The studied Longjing tea seeds were neither orthodox nor recalcitrant.

Taxon
Longjing teae0
Outcome
neither orthodox nor recalcitrante0

Verbatim

e0

“Longjing tea seeds used in this study were neither orthodox nor recalcitrant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1367–1443 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Interaction between lipids and freezable water may cause cryoinjury in tea seeds.

Taxon
teat0
Compound
lipidse0
Outcome
cryoinjurye0
Qualifier
freezable watere0

Verbatim

e0

“the interaction between lipids and freezable water in seeds may lead to the cryoinjury”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1458–1544 · show in text ↑
t0

“Longjing Tea Seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–71 · show in text ↑

soil water · growth · Camellia sinensis (black tea)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

processing · growth · Camellia sinensis (black tea)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

in vitro · growth · Camellia sinensis (black tea)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 3 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.