Paper · 2024 · Agriculture

Changes in Photosynthetic Efficiency, Biomass, and Sugar Content of Sweet Sorghum Under Different Water and Salt Conditions in Arid Region of Northwest China

Weihao Sun; Zhibin He; Bing Liu; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) has significant cultivation potential in arid and saline–alkaline regions due to its drought and salt tolerance. This study aims to evaluate the mechanisms by which increased soil salinity and reduced irrigation affect the growth, aboveground biomass, and stem sugar content of sweet sorghum. A two-year field experiment was conducted, with four salinity levels (CK: 4.17 dS/m, S1: 5.83 dS/m, S2: 7.50 dS/m, and S3: 9.17 dS/m) and three irrigation levels (W1: 90 mm, W2: 70 mm, and W3: 50 mm). The results showed that increased salinity and reduced irrigation significantly reduced both the emergence rate and aboveground biomass, with the decreases in the emergence rate ranging from 11.0% to 36.2% and the reductions in the aboveground biomass ranging from 15.9% to 43.8%. Additionally, increased soil salinity led to reductions in stem sugar content of 6.3% (S1), 8.8% (S2), and 12.8% (S3), respectively. The results also indicated that photosynthetic efficiency, including the net photosynthetic rate (Pn), stomatal conductance (Gs), and chlorophyll content (SPAD), was significantly hindered under increased water and salt stress, with the Pn decreasing by up to 50.4% and the SPAD values decreasing by up to 36.3% under the highest stress conditions. These findings underscore the adverse impacts of increased soil salinity and reduced irrigation on sweet sorghum’s growth, photosynthetic performance, and sugar accumulation, offering critical insights for optimizing its cultivation in arid and saline environments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased salinity and reduced irrigation significantly reduced sweet sorghum emergence rate by 11.0% to 36.2%.

Taxon
Sweet Sorghumt0
Treatment
increased salinity and reduced irrigatione0
Outcome
emergence ratee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
11.0% to 36.2%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“increased salinity and reduced irrigation significantly reduced both the emergence rate and aboveground biomass, with the decreases in the emergence rate ranging from 11.0% to 36.2% and the reductions in the aboveground biomass ranging from 15.9% to 43.8%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 560–815 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased salinity and reduced irrigation significantly reduced aboveground biomass of sweet sorghum by 15.9% to 43.8%.

Taxon
Sweet Sorghumt0
Treatment
increased salinity and reduced irrigatione0
Outcome
aboveground biomasse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
15.9% to 43.8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“increased salinity and reduced irrigation significantly reduced both the emergence rate and aboveground biomass, with the decreases in the emergence rate ranging from 11.0% to 36.2% and the reductions in the aboveground biomass ranging from 15.9% to 43.8%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 560–815 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased soil salinity S1 reduced stem sugar content by 6.3%.

Taxon
Sweet Sorghumt0
Treatment
increased soil salinitye0
Outcome
stem sugar contente0
Direction
reductionse0
Value
6.3%e0
Qualifier
S1e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“increased soil salinity led to reductions in stem sugar content of 6.3% (S1), 8.8% (S2), and 12.8% (S3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–934 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased soil salinity S2 reduced stem sugar content by 8.8%.

Taxon
Sweet Sorghumt0
Treatment
increased soil salinitye0
Outcome
stem sugar contente0
Direction
reductionse0
Value
8.8%e0
Qualifier
S2e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“increased soil salinity led to reductions in stem sugar content of 6.3% (S1), 8.8% (S2), and 12.8% (S3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–934 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased soil salinity S3 reduced stem sugar content by 12.8%.

Taxon
Sweet Sorghumt0
Treatment
increased soil salinitye0
Outcome
stem sugar contente0
Direction
reductionse0
Value
12.8%e0
Qualifier
S3e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“increased soil salinity led to reductions in stem sugar content of 6.3% (S1), 8.8% (S2), and 12.8% (S3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–934 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Net photosynthetic rate decreased by up to 50.4% under the highest water and salt stress.

Taxon
Sweet Sorghumt0
Treatment
increased water and salt stresse0
Outcome
Pne0
Direction
decreasinge0
Value
50.4%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“photosynthetic efficiency, including the net photosynthetic rate (Pn), stomatal conductance (Gs), and chlorophyll content (SPAD), was significantly hindered under increased water and salt stress, with the Pn decreasing by up to 50.4% and the SPAD values decreasing by up to 36.3% under the highest stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1297 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll content (SPAD) decreased by up to 36.3% under the highest water and salt stress.

Taxon
Sweet Sorghumt0
Treatment
increased water and salt stresse0
Outcome
SPAD valuese0
Direction
decreasinge0
Value
36.3%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“photosynthetic efficiency, including the net photosynthetic rate (Pn), stomatal conductance (Gs), and chlorophyll content (SPAD), was significantly hindered under increased water and salt stress, with the Pn decreasing by up to 50.4% and the SPAD values decreasing by up to 36.3% under the highest stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1297 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Stomatal conductance was significantly hindered under increased water and salt stress.

Taxon
Sweet Sorghumt0
Treatment
increased water and salt stresse0
Outcome
stomatal conductance (Gs)e0
Direction
hinderede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“photosynthetic efficiency, including the net photosynthetic rate (Pn), stomatal conductance (Gs), and chlorophyll content (SPAD), was significantly hindered under increased water and salt stress, with the Pn decreasing by up to 50.4% and the SPAD values decreasing by up to 36.3% under the highest stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1297 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–81 · show in text ↑

salinity · physiology: pigments · SorghumResults differ

18 papers: 0 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

salinity · growth · SorghumResults differ

89 papers: 11 positive, 78 negative or no effect

77 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

85 papers more in this group

See all 89 papers →

salinity · physiology: photosynthesis · SorghumPositive and negative results

25 papers: 1 positive, 24 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

irrigation · growth · SorghumPositive and negative results

51 papers: 31 positive, 20 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

salinity · quality: sugar starch · SorghumResults agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

salinity · physiology: gas exchange · SorghumResults agree

8 papers: 0 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.