Paper · 2014 · Ganhan diqu nongye yanjiu

Photosynthetic characteristics and agronomic traits of sweet sorghum in saline-alkaline soil

Feng Guo-ju

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Two sweet sorghum cultivars,mid-early maturity cultivarXingaoliang 3and mid-late maturity cultivarXingaoliang 9,were planted in saline-alkaline soil.Photosynthetic characteristics and agronomic traits of them were studied.The result showed that:(1)Compared to control,net photosynthetic rate(Pn),transpiration rate(Tr),stomatal conductance(Gs),intercellular CO2 concentration(Ci),water use efficiency(WUE),and SPAD value(SPAD)were significantly lower in saline-alkaline soil,especially at late growth period.Pn,Gs,WUE,and SPADof Xingaoliang 3 were higher whereas Trand Ci were lower than those of Xingaoliang 9 in saline-alkaline soil.(2)The growth duration ofXingaoliang 3was shortened by 9 days,whileXingaoliang 9only survived until jointing stage in salinealkaline soil.Compared to control,the biomass of two sweet sorghums in saline-alkaline soil was reduced by 57.8% and 76.5%,respectively,and sugar brix by 38.5% and 100%.(3)The correlation analysis indicated that Pn was highly correlated with Gs,PAR,and Ta.At early stage,the reduction in Pn was associated with stomatal limitation,whereas non-stomatal factor was the main cause after heading.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Net photosynthetic rate, transpiration rate and stomatal conductance of sweet sorghum were significantly lower in saline-alkaline soil than in control, especially late in growth.

Taxon
sweet sorghumt0
Treatment
saline-alkaline soile1
Outcome
net photosynthetic rate(Pn),transpiration rate(Tr),stomatal conductance(Gs)e1
Direction
lowere1
Qualifier
especially at late growth periode1
Comparator
controle1

Verbatim

t0

“sweet sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–68 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared to control,net photosynthetic rate(Pn),transpiration rate(Tr),stomatal conductance(Gs),intercellular CO2 concentration(Ci),water use efficiency(WUE),and SPAD value(SPAD)were significantly lower in saline-alkaline soil,especially at late growth period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 248–507 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercellular CO2 concentration, water use efficiency and SPAD value of sweet sorghum were significantly lower in saline-alkaline soil than in control.

Taxon
sweet sorghumt0
Treatment
saline-alkaline soile1
Outcome
intercellular CO2 concentration(Ci),water use efficiency(WUE),and SPAD value(SPAD)e1
Direction
lowere1
Qualifier
especially at late growth periode1
Comparator
controle1

Verbatim

t0

“sweet sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–68 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared to control,net photosynthetic rate(Pn),transpiration rate(Tr),stomatal conductance(Gs),intercellular CO2 concentration(Ci),water use efficiency(WUE),and SPAD value(SPAD)were significantly lower in saline-alkaline soil,especially at late growth period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 248–507 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In saline-alkaline soil, Pn, Gs, WUE and SPAD were higher in Xingaoliang 3 than in Xingaoliang 9.

Taxon
sweet sorghumt0
Material
Xingaoliang 3e2
Treatment
saline-alkaline soile2
Outcome
Pn,Gs,WUE,and SPADe2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
Xingaoliang 9e2

Verbatim

t0

“sweet sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–68 · show in text ↑
e2

“Pn,Gs,WUE,and SPADof Xingaoliang 3 were higher whereas Trand Ci were lower than those of Xingaoliang 9 in saline-alkaline soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 508–634 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In saline-alkaline soil, Tr and Ci were lower in Xingaoliang 3 than in Xingaoliang 9.

Taxon
sweet sorghumt0
Material
Xingaoliang 3e2
Treatment
saline-alkaline soile2
Outcome
Trand Cie2
Direction
lowere2
Comparator
Xingaoliang 9e2

Verbatim

t0

“sweet sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–68 · show in text ↑
e2

“Pn,Gs,WUE,and SPADof Xingaoliang 3 were higher whereas Trand Ci were lower than those of Xingaoliang 9 in saline-alkaline soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 508–634 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The growth duration of Xingaoliang 3 was shortened by 9 days in saline-alkaline soil.

Taxon
sweet sorghumt0
Material
Xingaoliang3e3
Outcome
growth duratione3
Direction
shortenede3
Value
9 dayse3

Verbatim

t0

“sweet sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–68 · show in text ↑
e3

“The growth duration ofXingaoliang3was shortened by 9 days”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 638–696 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Xingaoliang 9 survived only until the jointing stage in saline-alkaline soil.

Taxon
sweet sorghumt0
Material
Xingaoliang 9e4
Outcome
survivede4
Qualifier
until jointing stagee4

Verbatim

t0

“sweet sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–68 · show in text ↑
e4

“whileXingaoliang 9only survived until jointing stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 697–749 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biomass of the two sweet sorghum cultivars in saline-alkaline soil was reduced by 57.8% and 76.5% relative to control.

Taxon
sweet sorghumt0
Treatment
saline-alkaline soile5
Outcome
biomasse5
Direction
reducede5
Value
57.8% and 76.5%e5
Comparator
controle5

Verbatim

t0

“sweet sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–68 · show in text ↑
e5

“Compared to control,the biomass of two sweet sorghums in saline-alkaline soil was reduced by 57.8% and 76.5%,respectively,and sugar brix by 38.5% and 100%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–927 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugar brix of the two sweet sorghum cultivars in saline-alkaline soil was reduced by 38.5% and 100% relative to control.

Taxon
sweet sorghumt0
Treatment
saline-alkaline soile5
Outcome
sugar brixe5
Direction
reducede5
Value
38.5% and 100%e5
Comparator
controle5

Verbatim

t0

“sweet sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–68 · show in text ↑
e5

“Compared to control,the biomass of two sweet sorghums in saline-alkaline soil was reduced by 57.8% and 76.5%,respectively,and sugar brix by 38.5% and 100%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–927 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pn was highly correlated with Gs, PAR and Ta in sweet sorghum.

Taxon
sweet sorghumt0
Outcome
Pne7
Qualifier
highly correlated with Gs,PAR,and Tae7

Verbatim

t0

“sweet sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–68 · show in text ↑
e7

“The correlation analysis indicated that Pn was highly correlated with Gs,PAR,and Ta”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 931–1014 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At early stage, the reduction in Pn of sweet sorghum was associated with stomatal limitation.

Taxon
sweet sorghumt0
Outcome
reduction in Pne0
Qualifier
stomatal limitatione0

Verbatim

t0

“sweet sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“At early stage,the reduction in Pn was associated with stomatal limitation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1089 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After heading, non-stomatal factor was the main cause of the reduction in Pn of sweet sorghum.

Taxon
sweet sorghumt0
Outcome
reduction in Pne0
Qualifier
non-stomatal factor was the main cause after headinge0

Verbatim

t0

“sweet sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“the reduction in Pn was associated with stomatal limitation,whereas non-stomatal factor was the main cause after heading”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1150 · show in text ↑

salinity · growth · SorghumResults differ

89 papers: 11 positive, 78 negative or no effect

77 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

85 papers more in this group

See all 89 papers →

salinity · physiology: water · SorghumPositive and negative results

9 papers: 5 positive, 4 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

salinity · physiology: photosynthesis · SorghumPositive and negative results

25 papers: 1 positive, 24 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

salinity · quality: sugar starch · SorghumResults agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.