Abstract
In this study, Standard Precipitation Index (SPI) and Percent of Normal Index (PNI) values were found in order to determine the drought conditions between 2012-2020 in Ankara province. Drought severity interpretations were made according to the index values obtained and these values were evaluated together with some grain yields grown in the region. Separate regression analysis was performed between the different drought index values obtained within the scope of the study and the irrigated and dry agricultural yield values of wheat, barley and triticale. According to the index values calculated between 2012 and 2020 according to the SPI method, drought conditions are generally close to normal in the region. According to the PNI values, it was determined that 2013 had mildly dry conditions and other years had near-normal drought conditions. According to both indices, a drought close to normal was observed during the research period. In the regression analysis made according to wheat, barley and triticale yields, the highest linearity was obtained in barley, and values close to barley were found in triticale. Wheat is the cereal with the lowest linearity. The regression coefficients obtained as 0.4294 for barley, 0.3331 for triticale, and 0.0502 for wheat were found to be 0.0584 for SPI and 0.0013 for PNI. According to the results obtained, it can be said that statistically linearity is in barley and triticale. In average yields, an increase of 47% in wheat, 55% in barley and 34% in triticale was observed with irrigation. In order to ensure sustainable grain cultivation in drought conditions, it is recommended to expand modern irrigation practices in coordination with drought analysis studies and to increase scientific studies on this subject.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Barley had the highest linearity between drought indices and yield.
- Taxon
- barley
.jpg?width=60)
Hordeum vulgaree0 - Outcome
- highest linearitye0
- Setting
- regression analysise0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“In the regression analysis made according to wheat, barley and triticale yields, the highest linearity was obtained in barley, and values close to barley were found in triticale.”
Claim · model-written summary
Triticale had linearity close to barley between drought indices and yield.
- Taxon
- triticale
×Triticosecalee0 - Outcome
- values close to barleye0
- Comparator
- barleye0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In the regression analysis made according to wheat, barley and triticale yields, the highest linearity was obtained in barley, and values close to barley were found in triticale.”
Claim · model-written summary
Wheat had the lowest linearity between drought indices and yield.
- Taxon
- Wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Outcome
- lowest linearitye0
Not reportedSettingDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Wheat is the cereal with the lowest linearity.”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation increased average wheat yield by 47%.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- irrigatione0
- Outcome
- average yieldse0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 47%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In average yields, an increase of 47% in wheat, 55% in barley and 34% in triticale was observed with irrigation.”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation increased average barley yield by 55%.
- Taxon
- barleyHordeum vulgaree0
- Treatment
- irrigatione0
- Outcome
- average yieldse0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 55%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In average yields, an increase of 47% in wheat, 55% in barley and 34% in triticale was observed with irrigation.”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation increased average triticale yield by 34%.
- Taxon
- triticale×Triticosecalee0
- Treatment
- irrigatione0
- Outcome
- average yieldse0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 34%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In average yields, an increase of 47% in wheat, 55% in barley and 34% in triticale was observed with irrigation.”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend expanding modern irrigation practices with drought analysis for sustainable grain cultivation.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume1
- Outcome
- expand modern irrigation practices in coordination with drought analysis studiese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In order to ensure sustainable grain cultivation in drought conditions, it is recommended to expand modern irrigation practices in coordination with drought analysis studies and to increase scientific studies on this subject.”
e1“yield values of wheat, barley and triticale”
The same questions in other papers
irrigation · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results differ
82 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
105 papers more in this group
See all 109 papers →irrigation · yield · x Triticosecale (triticale)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- no effect
985 papers more in this group
See all 989 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.