Paper · 2024 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Better growth and yield performance of lentil under different level of phosphorus,sulphur and zinc in sub-humid Southern plain of Rajasthan

Sundar Anchra Sundar Anchra; M.K. KAUSHIK; J. CHOUDHARY; et al.

20
claims
38
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during the winter (rabi) season of 2020–21 and 2021–22 at Instructional Farm, Rajasthan College of Agriculture, Udaipur (Rajasthan) to assess the impact of different levels of phosphorus, sulphur and zinc on growth parameters and yield of lentil. The experiment was laid out in randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications and 18 treatment combinations. Phosphorus factor comprised of 3 levels, viz. 30, 40 and 50 kg P2 O5 /ha along with sulphur that comprised of 3 levels, viz. 15, 20 and 25 kg/ha; and zinc factor with 2 levels, viz. control and 0.5 % ZnSO4 foliar spray at 55 Days after sowing (DAS). Results revealed that the higher plant height, dry matter accumulation (DMA) and primary branches/plant were recorded with application of 40 kg P2 O5 /ha in combination of 25 kg/ha sulphur and foliar spray of 0.5% ZnSO4 at 55 DAS. The dry matter accumulation (0.838**) and plant height (0.871**) had a significant and positive correlation with the seed yield. The crop growth rate (CGR) enlaced by 10.49% and root-shoot ratio by 7.21% with application of 40 kg P2 O5 /ha over 30 kg P2 O5 /ha. Similarly, the CGR and root-shoot ratio of lentil were significantly enhanced by 11.95 and 5.19%, respectively with 25 kg/ha over 15 kg/ha sulphur application at 60-90 DAS. Likewise, the significantly increased CGR by 5.09% and root-shoot ratio by 3.72% with application of 0.5% ZnSO4 as foliar spray over control. Moreover, the effective nodules increased by 22.68% and fresh and dry weight by 20.9 and 8.0% respectively with 50 kg P2 O5 /ha during both the years. The effective nodules and fresh and dry weight of nodules/ plant increased by 13.59, 12.68 and 6.52% respectively with 25 kg/ha over 15 kg/ha suphur application while it was increased by. 6.71%, the by 6.39 and 4.08% respectively with 0.5% foliar spray of ZnSO4 over control. Furthermore, significantly higher seed, haulm and biological yields increased by 9.34, 12.90 and 11.75%, respectively with 40 kg P2 O5 /ha followed by 50 kg P2 O5 /ha over 30 kg P2 O5 /ha. Similarly, the application of 25 kg/ha sulphur significantly enhanced seed yield, haulm and biological yields of lentil but it has no significant effect on the harvest index. The foliar spray of 0.5% ZnSO4 increased the seed yield by 4.71 per cent, haulm yield by 7.30 per cent and biological yield by 6.45% over control. The plant growth parameters, yield attributes and yield of lentil were significantly enhanced with the application of P2O5 (40 kg/ha) and sulphur (25 kg/ha) along with ZnSO4 (0.5%) as foliar spray at 55 days after sowing as compared to other treatment combinations. These treatment combinations could be adopted to achieve better growth performances and bridging yield gap of lentil in sub-humid agro ecologies.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined phosphorus, sulphur and zinc treatment produced higher plant height, dry matter and primary branches.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise1
Treatment
40 kg P2 O5 /ha in combination of 25 kg/ha sulphur and foliar spray of 0.5% ZnSO4 at 55 DASe0
Outcome
plant height, dry matter accumulation (DMA) and primary branches/plante0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results revealed that the higher plant height, dry matter accumulation (DMA) and primary branches/plant were recorded with application of 40 kg P2 O5 /ha in combination of 25 kg/ha sulphur and foliar spray of 0.5% ZnSO4 at 55 DAS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–886 · show in text ↑
e1

“to assess the impact of different levels of phosphorus, sulphur and zinc on growth parameters and yield of lentil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 165–279 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

dry matter accumulation correlated positively and significantly with seed yield.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise1
Organ / stage
dry matter accumulatione0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
positivee0
Value
0.838**e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The dry matter accumulation (0.838**) and plant height (0.871**) had a significant and positive correlation with the seed yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–1015 · show in text ↑
e1

“to assess the impact of different levels of phosphorus, sulphur and zinc on growth parameters and yield of lentil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 165–279 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

plant height correlated positively and significantly with seed yield.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise1
Organ / stage
plant heighte0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
positivee0
Value
0.871**e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The dry matter accumulation (0.838**) and plant height (0.871**) had a significant and positive correlation with the seed yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–1015 · show in text ↑
e1

“to assess the impact of different levels of phosphorus, sulphur and zinc on growth parameters and yield of lentil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 165–279 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

40 kg P2 O5 /ha increased lentil crop growth rate (CGR) by 10.49%.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise1
Treatment
40 kg P2 O5 /hae0
Outcome
crop growth rate (CGR)e0
Direction
enlacede0
Value
10.49%e0
Comparator
30 kg P2 O5 /hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The crop growth rate (CGR) enlaced by 10.49% and root-shoot ratio by 7.21% with application of 40 kg P2 O5 /ha over 30 kg P2 O5 /ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1148 · show in text ↑
e1

“to assess the impact of different levels of phosphorus, sulphur and zinc on growth parameters and yield of lentil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 165–279 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

40 kg P2 O5 /ha increased lentil root-shoot ratio by 7.21%.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise1
Treatment
40 kg P2 O5 /hae0
Outcome
root-shoot ratioe0
Direction
enlacede0
Value
7.21%e0
Comparator
30 kg P2 O5 /hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The crop growth rate (CGR) enlaced by 10.49% and root-shoot ratio by 7.21% with application of 40 kg P2 O5 /ha over 30 kg P2 O5 /ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1148 · show in text ↑
e1

“to assess the impact of different levels of phosphorus, sulphur and zinc on growth parameters and yield of lentil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 165–279 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

25 kg/ha increased lentil CGR by 11.95.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise1
Treatment
25 kg/hae0
Outcome
CGRe0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
11.95e0
Comparator
15 kg/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similarly, the CGR and root-shoot ratio of lentil were significantly enhanced by 11.95 and 5.19%, respectively with 25 kg/ha over 15 kg/ha sulphur application at 60-90 DAS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1149–1321 · show in text ↑
e1

“to assess the impact of different levels of phosphorus, sulphur and zinc on growth parameters and yield of lentil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 165–279 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

25 kg/ha increased lentil root-shoot ratio by 5.19%.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise1
Treatment
25 kg/hae0
Outcome
root-shoot ratioe0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
5.19%e0
Comparator
15 kg/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similarly, the CGR and root-shoot ratio of lentil were significantly enhanced by 11.95 and 5.19%, respectively with 25 kg/ha over 15 kg/ha sulphur application at 60-90 DAS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1149–1321 · show in text ↑
e1

“to assess the impact of different levels of phosphorus, sulphur and zinc on growth parameters and yield of lentil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 165–279 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

0.5% ZnSO4 as foliar spray increased lentil CGR by 5.09%.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise1
Treatment
0.5% ZnSO4 as foliar spraye0
Outcome
CGRe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
5.09%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Likewise, the significantly increased CGR by 5.09% and root-shoot ratio by 3.72% with application of 0.5% ZnSO4 as foliar spray over control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1322–1463 · show in text ↑
e1

“to assess the impact of different levels of phosphorus, sulphur and zinc on growth parameters and yield of lentil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 165–279 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

0.5% ZnSO4 as foliar spray increased lentil root-shoot ratio by 3.72%.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise1
Treatment
0.5% ZnSO4 as foliar spraye0
Outcome
root-shoot ratioe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
3.72%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Likewise, the significantly increased CGR by 5.09% and root-shoot ratio by 3.72% with application of 0.5% ZnSO4 as foliar spray over control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1322–1463 · show in text ↑
e1

“to assess the impact of different levels of phosphorus, sulphur and zinc on growth parameters and yield of lentil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 165–279 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

50 kg P2 O5 /ha increased lentil effective nodules by 22.68%.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise1
Treatment
50 kg P2 O5 /hae0
Outcome
effective nodulese0
Direction
increasede0
Value
22.68%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Moreover, the effective nodules increased by 22.68% and fresh and dry weight by 20.9 and 8.0% respectively with 50 kg P2 O5 /ha during both the years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1464–1614 · show in text ↑
e1

“to assess the impact of different levels of phosphorus, sulphur and zinc on growth parameters and yield of lentil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 165–279 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

50 kg P2 O5 /ha increased lentil fresh by 20.9.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise1
Treatment
50 kg P2 O5 /hae0
Outcome
freshe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
20.9e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Moreover, the effective nodules increased by 22.68% and fresh and dry weight by 20.9 and 8.0% respectively with 50 kg P2 O5 /ha during both the years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1464–1614 · show in text ↑
e1

“to assess the impact of different levels of phosphorus, sulphur and zinc on growth parameters and yield of lentil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 165–279 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

50 kg P2 O5 /ha increased lentil dry weight by 8.0%.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise1
Treatment
50 kg P2 O5 /hae0
Outcome
dry weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
8.0%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Moreover, the effective nodules increased by 22.68% and fresh and dry weight by 20.9 and 8.0% respectively with 50 kg P2 O5 /ha during both the years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1464–1614 · show in text ↑
e1

“to assess the impact of different levels of phosphorus, sulphur and zinc on growth parameters and yield of lentil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 165–279 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

25 kg/ha increased lentil effective nodules by 13.59.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise1
Treatment
25 kg/hae0
Outcome
effective nodulese0
Direction
increasede0
Value
13.59e0
Comparator
15 kg/ha suphur applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effective nodules and fresh and dry weight of nodules/ plant increased by 13.59, 12.68 and 6.52% respectively with 25 kg/ha over 15 kg/ha suphur application while it was increased by. 6.71%, the by 6.39 and 4.08% respectively with 0.5% foliar spray of ZnSO4 over control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1615–1890 · show in text ↑
e1

“to assess the impact of different levels of phosphorus, sulphur and zinc on growth parameters and yield of lentil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 165–279 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

25 kg/ha increased lentil fresh by 12.68.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise1
Treatment
25 kg/hae0
Outcome
freshe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
12.68e0
Comparator
15 kg/ha suphur applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effective nodules and fresh and dry weight of nodules/ plant increased by 13.59, 12.68 and 6.52% respectively with 25 kg/ha over 15 kg/ha suphur application while it was increased by. 6.71%, the by 6.39 and 4.08% respectively with 0.5% foliar spray of ZnSO4 over control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1615–1890 · show in text ↑
e1

“to assess the impact of different levels of phosphorus, sulphur and zinc on growth parameters and yield of lentil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 165–279 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

25 kg/ha increased lentil dry weight of nodules/ plant by 6.52%.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise1
Treatment
25 kg/hae0
Outcome
dry weight of nodules/ plante0
Direction
increasede0
Value
6.52%e0
Comparator
15 kg/ha suphur applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effective nodules and fresh and dry weight of nodules/ plant increased by 13.59, 12.68 and 6.52% respectively with 25 kg/ha over 15 kg/ha suphur application while it was increased by. 6.71%, the by 6.39 and 4.08% respectively with 0.5% foliar spray of ZnSO4 over control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1615–1890 · show in text ↑
e1

“to assess the impact of different levels of phosphorus, sulphur and zinc on growth parameters and yield of lentil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 165–279 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

0.5% foliar spray of ZnSO4 increased lentil effective nodules by 6.71%.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise1
Treatment
0.5% foliar spray of ZnSO4e0
Outcome
effective nodulese0
Direction
increasede0
Value
6.71%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effective nodules and fresh and dry weight of nodules/ plant increased by 13.59, 12.68 and 6.52% respectively with 25 kg/ha over 15 kg/ha suphur application while it was increased by. 6.71%, the by 6.39 and 4.08% respectively with 0.5% foliar spray of ZnSO4 over control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1615–1890 · show in text ↑
e1

“to assess the impact of different levels of phosphorus, sulphur and zinc on growth parameters and yield of lentil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 165–279 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

0.5% foliar spray of ZnSO4 increased lentil fresh by 6.39.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise1
Treatment
0.5% foliar spray of ZnSO4e0
Outcome
freshe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
6.39e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effective nodules and fresh and dry weight of nodules/ plant increased by 13.59, 12.68 and 6.52% respectively with 25 kg/ha over 15 kg/ha suphur application while it was increased by. 6.71%, the by 6.39 and 4.08% respectively with 0.5% foliar spray of ZnSO4 over control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1615–1890 · show in text ↑
e1

“to assess the impact of different levels of phosphorus, sulphur and zinc on growth parameters and yield of lentil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 165–279 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

0.5% foliar spray of ZnSO4 increased lentil dry weight of nodules/ plant by 4.08%.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise1
Treatment
0.5% foliar spray of ZnSO4e0
Outcome
dry weight of nodules/ plante0
Direction
increasede0
Value
4.08%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effective nodules and fresh and dry weight of nodules/ plant increased by 13.59, 12.68 and 6.52% respectively with 25 kg/ha over 15 kg/ha suphur application while it was increased by. 6.71%, the by 6.39 and 4.08% respectively with 0.5% foliar spray of ZnSO4 over control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1615–1890 · show in text ↑
e1

“to assess the impact of different levels of phosphorus, sulphur and zinc on growth parameters and yield of lentil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 165–279 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur at 25 kg/ha enhanced seed, haulm and biological yields.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
25 kg/ha sulphure0
Outcome
seed yield, haulm and biological yieldse0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of 25 kg/ha sulphur significantly enhanced seed yield, haulm and biological yields of lentil but it has no significant effect on the harvest index.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2091–2254 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur at 25 kg/ha had no significant effect on harvest index.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
25 kg/ha sulphure0
Outcome
harvest indexe0
Direction
no significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of 25 kg/ha sulphur significantly enhanced seed yield, haulm and biological yields of lentil but it has no significant effect on the harvest index.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2091–2254 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results differ

23 papers: 22 positive, 1 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

zinc sulfate · symbiosis · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

zinc sulfate · growth · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

zinc sulfate · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

16 papers: 16 positive, 0 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

application · symbiosis · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

application · growth · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 16 positive, 4 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

application · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 57 positive, 4 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.