Paper · 2025 · Food and Energy Security

Co‐Benefits of Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency Gains Through Combined Use of Controlled‐Release Urea and Conventional Urea in Rice

Linsheng Yang; Prakash Lakshmanan; Debao Tu; et al.

17
claims
34
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

ABSTRACT Combined use of controlled‐release urea and conventional urea (CCU) is considered a practical strategy to simultaneously achieve the dual benefits of crop yield and nitrogen use efficiency (NUE). However, the overall impact of CCU on rice production is not well understood. A meta‐analysis was conducted to determine the effect of CCU on rice yield and NUE in China. The results revealed that CCU increased rice yield by 6.22% and NUE by 16.5% compared with conventional urea. Significant yield and NUE gains from CCU were evident only when the ratio of controlled‐release urea to total nitrogen input reached 0.6 or above. Rice yield and NUE were increased simultaneously at nitrogen rates ranging from 150 to 225 kg ha −1 , with no significant improvement in grain yield and NUE with nitrogen supply beyond 290 and 327 kg ha −1 , respectively. In addition, rice yield and NUE were significantly greater with split rather than single application of CCU. Also, rice yield and NUE were increased when mean annual temperature (MAT), mean annual precipitation (MAP) and soil available nitrogen (AN) were more than 10°C, 800 mm, and 50 mg kg −1 , respectively. Soil pH and organic matter content were significant determinants of rice yield and NUE gains with CCU. Our findings clearly demonstrate that the combined use of controlled‐release urea and conventional urea will deliver significant gains in rice yield and NUE and that it should be proposed as an effective measure for sustainable rice production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined urea increased rice yield by 6.22% versus conventional urea.

Treatment
CCUe0
Outcome
rice yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
6.22%e0
Comparator
conventional ureae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results revealed that CCU increased rice yield by 6.22% and NUE by 16.5% compared with conventional urea.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 376–485 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined urea increased nitrogen use efficiency by 16.5% versus conventional urea.

Treatment
CCUe0
Outcome
NUEe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
16.5%e0
Comparator
conventional ureae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results revealed that CCU increased rice yield by 6.22% and NUE by 16.5% compared with conventional urea.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 376–485 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–132 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Significant rice yield gains required a controlled-release urea fraction of at least 0.6.

Treatment
CCUe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
gainse0
Value
0.6 or abovee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant yield and NUE gains from CCU were evident only when the ratio of controlled‐release urea to total nitrogen input reached 0.6 or above.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–632 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–132 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Significant nitrogen use efficiency gains required a controlled-release urea fraction of at least 0.6.

Treatment
CCUe0
Outcome
NUEe0
Direction
gainse0
Value
0.6 or abovee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant yield and NUE gains from CCU were evident only when the ratio of controlled‐release urea to total nitrogen input reached 0.6 or above.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–632 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–132 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice yield increased at nitrogen rates of 150 to 225 kg ha −1.

Treatment
nitrogen rates ranging from 150 to 225 kg ha −1e0
Outcome
Rice yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
150 to 225 kg ha −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rice yield and NUE were increased simultaneously at nitrogen rates ranging from 150 to 225 kg ha −1 , with no significant improvement in grain yield and NUE with nitrogen supply beyond 290 and 327 kg ha −1 , respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–854 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–132 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen use efficiency increased at nitrogen rates of 150 to 225 kg ha −1.

Treatment
nitrogen rates ranging from 150 to 225 kg ha −1e0
Outcome
NUEe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
150 to 225 kg ha −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rice yield and NUE were increased simultaneously at nitrogen rates ranging from 150 to 225 kg ha −1 , with no significant improvement in grain yield and NUE with nitrogen supply beyond 290 and 327 kg ha −1 , respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–854 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–132 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield showed no significant improvement beyond 290 kg ha −1 nitrogen.

Treatment
nitrogen supply beyond 290e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
no significant improvemente0
Value
290e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rice yield and NUE were increased simultaneously at nitrogen rates ranging from 150 to 225 kg ha −1 , with no significant improvement in grain yield and NUE with nitrogen supply beyond 290 and 327 kg ha −1 , respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–854 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–132 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen use efficiency showed no significant improvement beyond 327 kg ha −1 nitrogen.

Treatment
nitrogen supply beyond 290 and 327 kg ha −1e0
Outcome
NUEe0
Direction
no significant improvemente0
Value
327 kg ha −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rice yield and NUE were increased simultaneously at nitrogen rates ranging from 150 to 225 kg ha −1 , with no significant improvement in grain yield and NUE with nitrogen supply beyond 290 and 327 kg ha −1 , respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–854 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Split combined-urea application gave significantly greater rice yield than single application.

Treatment
splite0
Outcome
rice yielde0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
single application of CCUe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In addition, rice yield and NUE were significantly greater with split rather than single application of CCU.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–963 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Split combined-urea application gave significantly greater nitrogen use efficiency than single application.

Treatment
splite0
Outcome
NUEe0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
single application of CCUe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In addition, rice yield and NUE were significantly greater with split rather than single application of CCU.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–963 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–132 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice yield increased where mean annual temperature exceeded 10°C.

Outcome
rice yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
10°Ce0
Setting
mean annual temperature (MAT)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Also, rice yield and NUE were increased when mean annual temperature (MAT), mean annual precipitation (MAP) and soil available nitrogen (AN) were more than 10°C, 800 mm, and 50 mg kg −1 , respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1165 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–132 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice yield increased where mean annual precipitation exceeded 800 mm.

Outcome
rice yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
800 mme0
Setting
mean annual precipitation (MAP)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Also, rice yield and NUE were increased when mean annual temperature (MAT), mean annual precipitation (MAP) and soil available nitrogen (AN) were more than 10°C, 800 mm, and 50 mg kg −1 , respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1165 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–132 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice yield increased where soil available nitrogen exceeded 50 mg kg −1.

Outcome
rice yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
50 mg kg −1e0
Setting
soil available nitrogen (AN)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Also, rice yield and NUE were increased when mean annual temperature (MAT), mean annual precipitation (MAP) and soil available nitrogen (AN) were more than 10°C, 800 mm, and 50 mg kg −1 , respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1165 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–132 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen use efficiency increased under the reported temperature, precipitation and soil nitrogen thresholds.

Outcome
NUEe0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
mean annual temperature (MAT), mean annual precipitation (MAP) and soil available nitrogen (AN)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Also, rice yield and NUE were increased when mean annual temperature (MAT), mean annual precipitation (MAP) and soil available nitrogen (AN) were more than 10°C, 800 mm, and 50 mg kg −1 , respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1165 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–132 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil pH and organic matter significantly determined rice yield gains with combined urea.

Treatment
CCUe0
Outcome
rice yielde0
Setting
Soil pH and organic matter contente0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil pH and organic matter content were significant determinants of rice yield and NUE gains with CCU.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1166–1268 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–132 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil pH and organic matter significantly determined nitrogen use efficiency gains with combined urea.

Treatment
CCUe0
Outcome
NUEe0
Setting
Soil pH and organic matter contente0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil pH and organic matter content were significant determinants of rice yield and NUE gains with CCU.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1166–1268 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–132 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose combined controlled-release and conventional urea for sustainable rice production.

Outcome
effective measure for sustainable rice productione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the combined use of controlled‐release urea and conventional urea will deliver significant gains in rice yield and NUE and that it should be proposed as an effective measure for sustainable rice production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1307–1513 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–132 · show in text ↑

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

220 papers: 202 positive, 18 negative or no effect

201 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

216 papers more in this group

See all 220 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

262 papers: 217 positive, 45 negative or no effect

216 papers in the same direction as this paper · 41 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

258 papers more in this group

See all 262 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

2,045 papers: 1,803 positive, 242 negative or no effect

1,802 papers in the same direction as this paper · 193 in the opposite direction · 49 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2,041 papers more in this group

See all 2,045 papers →

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

3,182 papers in the same direction as this paper · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,451 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.