Paper · 2025 · Journal of Pure and Applied Microbiology

Comparative Study of Trichoderma BHU-1 Mediated Drought Alleviation of Susceptible and Tolerant Rice Cultivars

Ram Nandan Yadav; Renu Yadav; Najam Waris Zaidi; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The study investigated Trichoderma-mediated morphological and biochemical responses in drought-susceptible and tolerant rice cultivars, namely IR-64 and DRR-44, under drought-stressed and normal conditions. Various morphological and biochemical parameters were recorded 30, 60, and 90 days after transplanting. The shoot length was insignificant, while the root length was significant in drought-susceptible DRR-44 compared to non-stressed plants. The number of roots was also significant in Trichoderma BHU-1 treated plants of both cultivars. Proline content was more substantial in drought susceptible cultivars than tolerant and similarly, lignin, TPC, PAL, and PO activities were higher in Trichoderma BHU-1 treated drought-stressed plants than in normal ones. The result revealed that Trichoderma BHU-1 treatment modulates an increase in root length, shoot length, and the total number of tillers and roots under drought conditions. It also maintained the level of phenolics in plants by upregulating the pathway thereby helping the plant to sustain drought.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Root length was significantly different in drought-susceptible rice cultivar DRR-44 under drought compared with non-stressed plants.

Material
DRR-44e1
Treatment
droughte1
Outcome
root lengthe1
Comparator
non-stressed plantse1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–110 · show in text ↑
e1

“the root length was significant in drought-susceptible DRR-44 compared to non-stressed plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 353–446 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot length was not significantly different in drought-susceptible DRR-44 compared with non-stressed plants.

Material
DRR-44e1
Treatment
droughte1
Outcome
shoot lengthe1
Comparator
non-stressed plantse1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–110 · show in text ↑
e1

“The shoot length was insignificant, while the root length was significant in drought-susceptible DRR-44 compared to non-stressed plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 311–446 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The number of roots was significantly different in Trichoderma BHU-1 treated plants of both rice cultivars.

Treatment
Trichoderma BHU-1e1
Interactor
Trichoderma BHU-1e1symbiont
Outcome
number of rootse1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–110 · show in text ↑
e1

“The number of roots was also significant in Trichoderma BHU-1 treated plants of both cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 448–542 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Proline content was higher in drought-susceptible rice cultivars than in tolerant ones.

Material
drought susceptible cultivarse1
Outcome
Proline contente1
Direction
more substantiale1
Comparator
tolerante1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–110 · show in text ↑
e1

“Proline content was more substantial in drought susceptible cultivars than tolerant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 544–627 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lignin and total phenolic content (TPC) were higher in Trichoderma BHU-1 treated drought-stressed rice plants than in normal plants.

Treatment
Trichoderma BHU-1e1
Interactor
Trichoderma BHU-1e1symbiont
Outcome
lignin, TPCe1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
normal onese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–110 · show in text ↑
e1

“lignin, TPC, PAL, and PO activities were higher in Trichoderma BHU-1 treated drought-stressed plants than in normal ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 643–763 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PAL and PO activities were higher in Trichoderma BHU-1 treated drought-stressed rice plants than in normal plants.

Treatment
Trichoderma BHU-1e1
Interactor
Trichoderma BHU-1e1symbiont
Outcome
PAL, and PO activitiese1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
normal onese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–110 · show in text ↑
e1

“lignin, TPC, PAL, and PO activities were higher in Trichoderma BHU-1 treated drought-stressed plants than in normal ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 643–763 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trichoderma BHU-1 treatment increased root length and shoot length of rice under drought conditions.

Treatment
Trichoderma BHU-1 treatmente1
Interactor
Trichoderma BHU-1e1symbiont
Outcome
root length, shoot lengthe1
Direction
increasee1
Qualifier
under drought conditionse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–110 · show in text ↑
e1

“Trichoderma BHU-1 treatment modulates an increase in root length, shoot length, and the total number of tillers and roots under drought conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–936 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trichoderma BHU-1 treatment increased the total number of tillers and roots of rice under drought conditions.

Treatment
Trichoderma BHU-1 treatmente1
Interactor
Trichoderma BHU-1e1symbiont
Outcome
total number of tillers and rootse1
Direction
increasee1
Qualifier
under drought conditionse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–110 · show in text ↑
e1

“Trichoderma BHU-1 treatment modulates an increase in root length, shoot length, and the total number of tillers and roots under drought conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–936 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors state that Trichoderma BHU-1 maintained the level of phenolics in rice plants by upregulating the pathway, helping the plant sustain drought.

Outcome
level of phenolicse1
Qualifier
upregulating the pathwaye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–110 · show in text ↑
e1

“It also maintained the level of phenolics in plants by upregulating the pathway thereby helping the plant to sustain drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1062 · show in text ↑

Trichoderma · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

36 papers: 30 positive, 6 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

Trichoderma · molecular: metabolites · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Trichoderma · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

32 papers: 32 positive, 0 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

drought · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

282 papers: 98 positive, 184 negative or no effect

183 papers in the same direction as this paper · 98 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

278 papers more in this group

See all 282 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.