Abstract
The present experiment was carried out at the Horticultural Research Farm, Department of Horticulture, Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University (A Central University), Vidya Vihar, Rae Bareli Road, Lucknow, U.P., India during the year 2019-21. The field experiment was laid out in simple randomized block design comprising of eight treatments combinations with three replication son quality and yield parameters of palak. The experiment finding reveals that all the quality parameters of spinach i.e. chlorophyll content, ascorbic acid, leaf moisture and dry weight were significantly improved by FYM (M3) and application and third time cuttings (C3). Maximum green leaf yield/ha was reported under this treatment has significantly affect treatment (M3) FYM manure applied and three-time cuttings. The maximum chlorophyll content was recorded under the treatment (M3) Azotobacter and first cuttings (M3). The maximum ascorbic acid content was noticed under the treatment(M3) with first time cuttings (C3).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
FYM and third cuttings significantly improved chlorophyll content, ascorbic acid, leaf moisture and dry weight.
- Taxon
- Palak (Beta vulgaris)
Beta vulgarise0t0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“chlorophyll content, ascorbic acid, leaf moisture and dry weight were significantly improved by FYM (M3) and application and third time cuttings (C3)”
t0“Palak (Beta vulgaris)”
Claim · model-written summary
FYM and third cuttings significantly improved dry weight.
- Taxon
- Palak (Beta vulgaris)Beta vulgarise0t0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“dry weight were significantly improved by FYM (M3) and application and third time cuttings (C3)”
t0“Palak (Beta vulgaris)”
Claim · model-written summary
FYM with three cuttings gave maximum green leaf yield per hectare.
- Taxon
- Palak (Beta vulgaris)Beta vulgarise0t0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Maximum green leaf yield/ha was reported under this treatment has significantly affect treatment (M3) FYM manure applied and three-time cuttings”
t0“Palak (Beta vulgaris)”
Claim · model-written summary
Azotobacter and first cuttings gave maximum chlorophyll content.
- Taxon
- Palak (Beta vulgaris)Beta vulgarise0t0
- Interactor
- Azotobacter
Azotobactere0t0symbiont
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The maximum chlorophyll content was recorded under the treatment (M3) Azotobacter and first cuttings (M3)”
t0“Palak (Beta vulgaris)”
Claim · model-written summary
M3 with first cuttings gave maximum ascorbic acid content.
- Taxon
- Palak (Beta vulgaris)Beta vulgarise0t0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The maximum ascorbic acid content was noticed under the treatment(M3) with first time cuttings (C3)”
t0“Palak (Beta vulgaris)”
The same questions in other papers
Azotobacter · physiology: pigments · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
fertilization · physiology: pigments · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
13 papers more in this group
See all 17 papers →fertilization · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
96 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
105 papers more in this group
See all 109 papers →fertilization · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
236 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
263 papers more in this group
See all 267 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.