Abstract
The present investigation entitled “Effect of integrated nutrient management on leaf nutrient status, yield and quality of spinach (Beta vulgaris L.) var. Pusa Jyoti” was carried out during kharif 2016 – 17 (first year), 2017 – 18 (second year) and pooled at the Experimental field, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, RVSKVV, Datia (M.P.) with 16 treatment combinations of three levels of inorganic fertilizers i.e. 50% RDF (75:40:50 kg NPK ha-1), 75% RDF (112.5:60:75 kg NPK ha-1) and 100% RDF control (150:80:100 kg NPK ha-1), three organic manure i.e. 20 t FYM ha-1, 10 t vermicompost (VC) ha-1 and 7.5 t poultry manure (PM) ha-1 and two bio-fertilizers viz,. 5 kg Azotobacter (Azo) ha-1 and 5 kg PSB ha-1. Experiments were laid out in Randomized Complete Block Design with three replications. Results revealed that the application of 75% RDF + 10 t Vermicompost ha-1 + 5 kg PSB ha-1 + 5 kg Azotobacter ha-1 (T8) was recorded significantly maximum leaf nitrogen (51.30, 52.30 and 51.80 g kg-1), phosphorus (7.30, 8.30 and 7.80 g kg-1), potash (57.30, 58.30 and 57.80 g kg-1), vitamin ‘C’ (49.6, 51.0 and 50.30 mg 100 g-1), chlorophyll index (140.20, 141.20 and 140.70 mg 100 g-1) and leaves yield hectare-1 (252.27, 254.87 and 253.57 q ha-1) at first year, second year and pooled, respectively as compared to control.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
The 75% RDF plus vermicompost, PSB and Azotobacter treatment (T8) gave the maximum leaf nitrogen.
- Taxon
- spinach (Beta vulgaris L.)
Beta vulgarist0 - Organ / stage
- leafe1
- Treatment
- application of 75% RDF + 10 t Vermicompost ha-1 + 5 kg PSB ha-1 + 5 kg Azotobacter ha-1 (T8)e1
- Interactor
- Azotobacter
Azotobactere4symbiont - Second interactor
- PSBe4symbiont
- Outcome
- leaf nitrogene1
- Direction
- maximume1
- Value
- 51.30, 52.30 and 51.80 g kg-1e1
- Comparator
- controle2
- Setting
- Experimental field, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, RVSKVV, Datia (M.P.)e3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Effect of integrated nutrient management on leaf nutrient status, yield and quality of spinach (Beta vulgaris L.) var. Pusa Jyoti”
e1“the application of 75% RDF + 10 t Vermicompost ha-1 + 5 kg PSB ha-1 + 5 kg Azotobacter ha-1 (T8) was recorded significantly maximum leaf nitrogen (51.30, 52.30 and 51.80 g kg-1), phosphorus (7.30, 8.30 and 7.80 g kg-1), potash (57.30, 58.30 and 57.80 g kg-1), vitamin ‘C’ (49.6, 51.0 and 50.30 mg 100 g-1), chlorophyll index (140.20, 141.20 and 140.70 mg 100 g-1) and leaves yield hectare-1 (252.27, 254.87 and 253.57 q ha-1) at first year, second year and pooled, respectively as compared to control”
e2“as compared to control”
e3“pooled at the Experimental field, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, RVSKVV, Datia (M.P.)”
e4“two bio-fertilizers viz,. 5 kg Azotobacter (Azo) ha-1 and 5 kg PSB ha-1”
Claim · model-written summary
The T8 treatment gave the maximum leaf phosphorus.
- Taxon
- spinach (Beta vulgaris L.)Beta vulgarist0
- Organ / stage
- leafe1
- Treatment
- application of 75% RDF + 10 t Vermicompost ha-1 + 5 kg PSB ha-1 + 5 kg Azotobacter ha-1 (T8)e1
- Interactor
- AzotobacterAzotobactere4symbiont
- Second interactor
- PSBe4symbiont
- Outcome
- phosphoruse1
- Direction
- maximume1
- Value
- 7.30, 8.30 and 7.80 g kg-1e1
- Comparator
- controle2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Effect of integrated nutrient management on leaf nutrient status, yield and quality of spinach (Beta vulgaris L.) var. Pusa Jyoti”
e1“the application of 75% RDF + 10 t Vermicompost ha-1 + 5 kg PSB ha-1 + 5 kg Azotobacter ha-1 (T8) was recorded significantly maximum leaf nitrogen (51.30, 52.30 and 51.80 g kg-1), phosphorus (7.30, 8.30 and 7.80 g kg-1), potash (57.30, 58.30 and 57.80 g kg-1), vitamin ‘C’ (49.6, 51.0 and 50.30 mg 100 g-1), chlorophyll index (140.20, 141.20 and 140.70 mg 100 g-1) and leaves yield hectare-1 (252.27, 254.87 and 253.57 q ha-1) at first year, second year and pooled, respectively as compared to control”
e2“as compared to control”
e4“two bio-fertilizers viz,. 5 kg Azotobacter (Azo) ha-1 and 5 kg PSB ha-1”
Claim · model-written summary
The T8 treatment gave the maximum leaf potash.
- Taxon
- spinach (Beta vulgaris L.)Beta vulgarist0
- Organ / stage
- leafe1
- Treatment
- application of 75% RDF + 10 t Vermicompost ha-1 + 5 kg PSB ha-1 + 5 kg Azotobacter ha-1 (T8)e1
- Interactor
- AzotobacterAzotobactere4symbiont
- Second interactor
- PSBe4symbiont
- Outcome
- potashe1
- Direction
- maximume1
- Value
- 57.30, 58.30 and 57.80 g kg-1e1
- Comparator
- controle2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Effect of integrated nutrient management on leaf nutrient status, yield and quality of spinach (Beta vulgaris L.) var. Pusa Jyoti”
e1“the application of 75% RDF + 10 t Vermicompost ha-1 + 5 kg PSB ha-1 + 5 kg Azotobacter ha-1 (T8) was recorded significantly maximum leaf nitrogen (51.30, 52.30 and 51.80 g kg-1), phosphorus (7.30, 8.30 and 7.80 g kg-1), potash (57.30, 58.30 and 57.80 g kg-1), vitamin ‘C’ (49.6, 51.0 and 50.30 mg 100 g-1), chlorophyll index (140.20, 141.20 and 140.70 mg 100 g-1) and leaves yield hectare-1 (252.27, 254.87 and 253.57 q ha-1) at first year, second year and pooled, respectively as compared to control”
e2“as compared to control”
e4“two bio-fertilizers viz,. 5 kg Azotobacter (Azo) ha-1 and 5 kg PSB ha-1”
Claim · model-written summary
The T8 treatment gave the maximum leaf vitamin C.
- Taxon
- spinach (Beta vulgaris L.)Beta vulgarist0
- Organ / stage
- leafe1
- Treatment
- application of 75% RDF + 10 t Vermicompost ha-1 + 5 kg PSB ha-1 + 5 kg Azotobacter ha-1 (T8)e1
- Interactor
- AzotobacterAzotobactere4symbiont
- Second interactor
- PSBe4symbiont
- Outcome
- vitamin ‘C’e1
- Direction
- maximume1
- Value
- 49.6, 51.0 and 50.30 mg 100 g-1e1
- Comparator
- controle2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Effect of integrated nutrient management on leaf nutrient status, yield and quality of spinach (Beta vulgaris L.) var. Pusa Jyoti”
e1“the application of 75% RDF + 10 t Vermicompost ha-1 + 5 kg PSB ha-1 + 5 kg Azotobacter ha-1 (T8) was recorded significantly maximum leaf nitrogen (51.30, 52.30 and 51.80 g kg-1), phosphorus (7.30, 8.30 and 7.80 g kg-1), potash (57.30, 58.30 and 57.80 g kg-1), vitamin ‘C’ (49.6, 51.0 and 50.30 mg 100 g-1), chlorophyll index (140.20, 141.20 and 140.70 mg 100 g-1) and leaves yield hectare-1 (252.27, 254.87 and 253.57 q ha-1) at first year, second year and pooled, respectively as compared to control”
e2“as compared to control”
e4“two bio-fertilizers viz,. 5 kg Azotobacter (Azo) ha-1 and 5 kg PSB ha-1”
Claim · model-written summary
The T8 treatment gave the maximum chlorophyll index.
- Taxon
- spinach (Beta vulgaris L.)Beta vulgarist0
- Organ / stage
- leafe1
- Treatment
- application of 75% RDF + 10 t Vermicompost ha-1 + 5 kg PSB ha-1 + 5 kg Azotobacter ha-1 (T8)e1
- Interactor
- AzotobacterAzotobactere4symbiont
- Second interactor
- PSBe4symbiont
- Outcome
- chlorophyll indexe1
- Direction
- maximume1
- Value
- 140.20, 141.20 and 140.70 mg 100 g-1e1
- Comparator
- controle2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Effect of integrated nutrient management on leaf nutrient status, yield and quality of spinach (Beta vulgaris L.) var. Pusa Jyoti”
e1“the application of 75% RDF + 10 t Vermicompost ha-1 + 5 kg PSB ha-1 + 5 kg Azotobacter ha-1 (T8) was recorded significantly maximum leaf nitrogen (51.30, 52.30 and 51.80 g kg-1), phosphorus (7.30, 8.30 and 7.80 g kg-1), potash (57.30, 58.30 and 57.80 g kg-1), vitamin ‘C’ (49.6, 51.0 and 50.30 mg 100 g-1), chlorophyll index (140.20, 141.20 and 140.70 mg 100 g-1) and leaves yield hectare-1 (252.27, 254.87 and 253.57 q ha-1) at first year, second year and pooled, respectively as compared to control”
e2“as compared to control”
e4“two bio-fertilizers viz,. 5 kg Azotobacter (Azo) ha-1 and 5 kg PSB ha-1”
Claim · model-written summary
The T8 treatment gave the maximum leaf yield per hectare.
- Taxon
- spinach (Beta vulgaris L.)Beta vulgarist0
- Treatment
- application of 75% RDF + 10 t Vermicompost ha-1 + 5 kg PSB ha-1 + 5 kg Azotobacter ha-1 (T8)e1
- Interactor
- AzotobacterAzotobactere4symbiont
- Second interactor
- PSBe4symbiont
- Outcome
- leaves yield hectare-1e1
- Direction
- maximume1
- Value
- 252.27, 254.87 and 253.57 q ha-1e1
- Comparator
- controle2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Effect of integrated nutrient management on leaf nutrient status, yield and quality of spinach (Beta vulgaris L.) var. Pusa Jyoti”
e1“the application of 75% RDF + 10 t Vermicompost ha-1 + 5 kg PSB ha-1 + 5 kg Azotobacter ha-1 (T8) was recorded significantly maximum leaf nitrogen (51.30, 52.30 and 51.80 g kg-1), phosphorus (7.30, 8.30 and 7.80 g kg-1), potash (57.30, 58.30 and 57.80 g kg-1), vitamin ‘C’ (49.6, 51.0 and 50.30 mg 100 g-1), chlorophyll index (140.20, 141.20 and 140.70 mg 100 g-1) and leaves yield hectare-1 (252.27, 254.87 and 253.57 q ha-1) at first year, second year and pooled, respectively as compared to control”
e2“as compared to control”
e4“two bio-fertilizers viz,. 5 kg Azotobacter (Azo) ha-1 and 5 kg PSB ha-1”
The same questions in other papers
Azotobacter · physiology: pigments · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
fertilization · quality: phytochemicals · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →fertilization · physiology: pigments · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
13 papers more in this group
See all 17 papers →fertilization · nutrient: content · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
55 papers more in this group
See all 59 papers →fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
64 papers more in this group
See all 68 papers →fertilization · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
236 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
263 papers more in this group
See all 267 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.