Abstract
The present investigation entitled “Effect of integrated nutrient management and plant growth regulators on growth attributes of fig (Ficus carica L.) under semi-arid conditions in Rajasthan was conducted on five-year old fig plants grown in sandy loam soils. While studies on fig are limited, this experiment was conducted to assess the response of the fig cultivar 'Black Ischia' to various organic and inorganic nutrient sources, as well as plant growth regulators, through thirty-two treatments replicated three times. During the investigation, the result revealed that the fig plant was studied for the growth parameters viz., shoot length, shoot girth, number of fruiting branches, spread of plant, leaf area and total chlorophyll content was recorded significantly maximum under treatment 50 % RDF + 50 % VC which was over rest of the treatments. However, the treatment 50 % RDF + 50 % PM and 50 % RDF + 50 % FYM was found statistically at par with it. Similarly, the shoot length, shoot girth, number of fruiting branches per plant, the spread of the plant, leaf area and total chlorophyll content were recorded significantly maximum under treatment 50 % GA3 + 50 % NAA over the rest of the treatments, including control.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
The 50 % RDF + 50 % VC treatment gave significantly maximal shoot length, shoot girth and fruiting branch number.
- Taxon
- fig (Ficus carica L.)
Ficus caricat0 - Material
- 'Black Ischia'e1
- Treatment
- 50 % RDF + 50 % VCe0
- Outcome
- shoot length, shoot girth, number of fruiting branchese0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Comparator
- rest of the treatmentse0
- Setting
- Rajasthant0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_(Ficus_carica)_-_Cagliari%2C_Italy_2024-03-26.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“shoot length, shoot girth, number of fruiting branches, spread of plant, leaf area and total chlorophyll content was recorded significantly maximum under treatment 50 % RDF + 50 % VC which was over rest of the treatments.”
t0“fig (Ficus carica L.) under Semi-Arid Conditions in Rajasthan”
e1“fig cultivar 'Black Ischia'”
Claim · model-written summary
The 50 % RDF + 50 % VC treatment gave significantly maximal plant spread and leaf area.
- Taxon
- fig (Ficus carica L.)
Ficus caricat0 - Treatment
- 50 % RDF + 50 % VCe0
- Outcome
- spread of plant, leaf areae0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Comparator
- rest of the treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_(Ficus_carica)_-_Cagliari%2C_Italy_2024-03-26.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“spread of plant, leaf area and total chlorophyll content was recorded significantly maximum under treatment 50 % RDF + 50 % VC which was over rest of the treatments.”
t0“fig (Ficus carica L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The 50 % RDF + 50 % VC treatment gave significantly maximal total chlorophyll content.
- Taxon
- fig (Ficus carica L.)
Ficus caricat0 - Treatment
- 50 % RDF + 50 % VCe0
- Outcome
- total chlorophyll contente0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Comparator
- rest of the treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_(Ficus_carica)_-_Cagliari%2C_Italy_2024-03-26.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“total chlorophyll content was recorded significantly maximum under treatment 50 % RDF + 50 % VC which was over rest of the treatments.”
t0“fig (Ficus carica L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The 50 % RDF + 50 % PM treatment was statistically at par with the leading nutrient treatment.
- Taxon
- fig (Ficus carica L.)
Ficus caricat0 - Treatment
- 50 % RDF + 50 % PMe0
- Outcome
- statistically at pare0
- Comparator
- 50 % RDF + 50 % VCe1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_(Ficus_carica)_-_Cagliari%2C_Italy_2024-03-26.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“the treatment 50 % RDF + 50 % PM and 50 % RDF + 50 % FYM was found statistically at par with it.”
t0“fig (Ficus carica L.)”
e1“50 % RDF + 50 % VC”
Claim · model-written summary
The 50 % RDF + 50 % FYM treatment was statistically at par with the leading nutrient treatment.
- Taxon
- fig (Ficus carica L.)
Ficus caricat0 - Treatment
- 50 % RDF + 50 % FYMe0
- Outcome
- statistically at pare0
- Comparator
- 50 % RDF + 50 % VCe1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_(Ficus_carica)_-_Cagliari%2C_Italy_2024-03-26.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“the treatment 50 % RDF + 50 % PM and 50 % RDF + 50 % FYM was found statistically at par with it.”
t0“fig (Ficus carica L.)”
e1“50 % RDF + 50 % VC”
Claim · model-written summary
The 50 % GA3 + 50 % NAA treatment maximized fig shoot length, girth and fruiting branches relative to other treatments.
- Taxon
- fig (Ficus carica L.)
Ficus caricat0 - Treatment
- 50 % GA3 + 50 % NAAe0
- Outcome
- shoot length, shoot girth, number of fruiting branches per plante0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Comparator
- rest of the treatments, including controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_(Ficus_carica)_-_Cagliari%2C_Italy_2024-03-26.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“the shoot length, shoot girth, number of fruiting branches per plant, the spread of the plant, leaf area and total chlorophyll content were recorded significantly maximum under treatment 50 % GA3 + 50 % NAA over the rest of the treatments, including control.”
t0“fig (Ficus carica L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The 50 % GA3 + 50 % NAA treatment maximized fig plant spread and leaf area.
- Taxon
- fig (Ficus carica L.)
Ficus caricat0 - Treatment
- 50 % GA3 + 50 % NAAe0
- Outcome
- spread of the plant, leaf areae0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Comparator
- rest of the treatments, including controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_(Ficus_carica)_-_Cagliari%2C_Italy_2024-03-26.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“the spread of the plant, leaf area and total chlorophyll content were recorded significantly maximum under treatment 50 % GA3 + 50 % NAA over the rest of the treatments, including control.”
t0“fig (Ficus carica L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The 50 % GA3 + 50 % NAA treatment maximized fig total chlorophyll content.
- Taxon
- fig (Ficus carica L.)
Ficus caricat0 - Treatment
- 50 % GA3 + 50 % NAAe0
- Outcome
- total chlorophyll contente0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Comparator
- rest of the treatments, including controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_(Ficus_carica)_-_Cagliari%2C_Italy_2024-03-26.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“total chlorophyll content were recorded significantly maximum under treatment 50 % GA3 + 50 % NAA over the rest of the treatments, including control.”
t0“fig (Ficus carica L.)”
The same questions in other papers
Gibberellic acid · physiology: pigments · Ficus carica (common fig)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Gibberellic acid · growth · Ficus carica (common fig)Results agree
6 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →1-naphthaleneacetic acid · growth · Ficus carica (common fig)Results agree
7 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →fertilization · growth · Ficus carica (common fig)Positive and negative results
13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
12 papers more in this group
See all 16 papers →fertilization · physiology: pigments · Ficus carica (common fig)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.