Paper · 2024 · Indian Journal of Pure & Applied Biosciences

Effect of Integrated Nutrient Management and Plant Growth Regulators on Growth Attributes of Fig (Ficus carica L.) under Semi-Arid Conditions in Rajasthan

Tulsi Ram Jangid

8
claims
19
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The present investigation entitled “Effect of integrated nutrient management and plant growth regulators on growth attributes of fig (Ficus carica L.) under semi-arid conditions in Rajasthan was conducted on five-year old fig plants grown in sandy loam soils. While studies on fig are limited, this experiment was conducted to assess the response of the fig cultivar 'Black Ischia' to various organic and inorganic nutrient sources, as well as plant growth regulators, through thirty-two treatments replicated three times. During the investigation, the result revealed that the fig plant was studied for the growth parameters viz., shoot length, shoot girth, number of fruiting branches, spread of plant, leaf area and total chlorophyll content was recorded significantly maximum under treatment 50 % RDF + 50 % VC which was over rest of the treatments. However, the treatment 50 % RDF + 50 % PM and 50 % RDF + 50 % FYM was found statistically at par with it. Similarly, the shoot length, shoot girth, number of fruiting branches per plant, the spread of the plant, leaf area and total chlorophyll content were recorded significantly maximum under treatment 50 % GA3 + 50 % NAA over the rest of the treatments, including control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 50 % RDF + 50 % VC treatment gave significantly maximal shoot length, shoot girth and fruiting branch number.

Taxon
fig (Ficus carica L.)Ficus caricat0
Material
'Black Ischia'e1
Treatment
50 % RDF + 50 % VCe0
Outcome
shoot length, shoot girth, number of fruiting branchese0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
rest of the treatmentse0
Setting
Rajasthant0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus carica
Ficus carica · TaxonRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shoot length, shoot girth, number of fruiting branches, spread of plant, leaf area and total chlorophyll content was recorded significantly maximum under treatment 50 % RDF + 50 % VC which was over rest of the treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 632–853 · show in text ↑
t0

“fig (Ficus carica L.) under Semi-Arid Conditions in Rajasthan”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 93–154 · show in text ↑
e1

“fig cultivar 'Black Ischia'”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 354–381 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 50 % RDF + 50 % VC treatment gave significantly maximal plant spread and leaf area.

Taxon
fig (Ficus carica L.)Ficus caricat0
Treatment
50 % RDF + 50 % VCe0
Outcome
spread of plant, leaf areae0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
rest of the treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus carica
Ficus carica · TaxonRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spread of plant, leaf area and total chlorophyll content was recorded significantly maximum under treatment 50 % RDF + 50 % VC which was over rest of the treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–853 · show in text ↑
t0

“fig (Ficus carica L.)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 93–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 50 % RDF + 50 % VC treatment gave significantly maximal total chlorophyll content.

Taxon
fig (Ficus carica L.)Ficus caricat0
Treatment
50 % RDF + 50 % VCe0
Outcome
total chlorophyll contente0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
rest of the treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus carica
Ficus carica · TaxonRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total chlorophyll content was recorded significantly maximum under treatment 50 % RDF + 50 % VC which was over rest of the treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–853 · show in text ↑
t0

“fig (Ficus carica L.)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 93–114 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 50 % RDF + 50 % PM treatment was statistically at par with the leading nutrient treatment.

Taxon
fig (Ficus carica L.)Ficus caricat0
Treatment
50 % RDF + 50 % PMe0
Outcome
statistically at pare0
Comparator
50 % RDF + 50 % VCe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus carica
Ficus carica · TaxonRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the treatment 50 % RDF + 50 % PM and 50 % RDF + 50 % FYM was found statistically at par with it.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–959 · show in text ↑
t0

“fig (Ficus carica L.)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 93–114 · show in text ↑
e1

“50 % RDF + 50 % VC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 796–814 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 50 % RDF + 50 % FYM treatment was statistically at par with the leading nutrient treatment.

Taxon
fig (Ficus carica L.)Ficus caricat0
Treatment
50 % RDF + 50 % FYMe0
Outcome
statistically at pare0
Comparator
50 % RDF + 50 % VCe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus carica
Ficus carica · TaxonRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the treatment 50 % RDF + 50 % PM and 50 % RDF + 50 % FYM was found statistically at par with it.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–959 · show in text ↑
t0

“fig (Ficus carica L.)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 93–114 · show in text ↑
e1

“50 % RDF + 50 % VC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 796–814 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 50 % GA3 + 50 % NAA treatment maximized fig shoot length, girth and fruiting branches relative to other treatments.

Taxon
fig (Ficus carica L.)Ficus caricat0
Treatment
50 % GA3 + 50 % NAAe0
Outcome
shoot length, shoot girth, number of fruiting branches per plante0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
rest of the treatments, including controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus carica
Ficus carica · TaxonRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the shoot length, shoot girth, number of fruiting branches per plant, the spread of the plant, leaf area and total chlorophyll content were recorded significantly maximum under treatment 50 % GA3 + 50 % NAA over the rest of the treatments, including control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1229 · show in text ↑
t0

“fig (Ficus carica L.)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 93–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 50 % GA3 + 50 % NAA treatment maximized fig plant spread and leaf area.

Taxon
fig (Ficus carica L.)Ficus caricat0
Treatment
50 % GA3 + 50 % NAAe0
Outcome
spread of the plant, leaf areae0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
rest of the treatments, including controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus carica
Ficus carica · TaxonRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the spread of the plant, leaf area and total chlorophyll content were recorded significantly maximum under treatment 50 % GA3 + 50 % NAA over the rest of the treatments, including control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1041–1229 · show in text ↑
t0

“fig (Ficus carica L.)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 93–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 50 % GA3 + 50 % NAA treatment maximized fig total chlorophyll content.

Taxon
fig (Ficus carica L.)Ficus caricat0
Treatment
50 % GA3 + 50 % NAAe0
Outcome
total chlorophyll contente0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
rest of the treatments, including controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus carica
Ficus carica · TaxonRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total chlorophyll content were recorded significantly maximum under treatment 50 % GA3 + 50 % NAA over the rest of the treatments, including control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1080–1229 · show in text ↑
t0

“fig (Ficus carica L.)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 93–114 · show in text ↑

Gibberellic acid · physiology: pigments · Ficus carica (common fig)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Gibberellic acid · growth · Ficus carica (common fig)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · growth · Ficus carica (common fig)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

fertilization · growth · Ficus carica (common fig)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 14 positive, 2 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Ficus carica (common fig)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.