Paper · 2025 · IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science

Impact of Bagging Type and Calcium Spraying on Some Fruit Traits and Yield of the Seedless Pomegranate Rawa cv.

O M T Alani; A F Z Al-Dulaimy

14
claims
30
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract A study was conducted in the district of Rawah, which is located 224 km away from the city of Ramadi, on the pomegranate trees of the seedless Rawa cv. The study investigated the effect of fruit bagging and calcium spray on some fruit traits and percentage of cracking in fruits. Two factors were studied during the research: the first factor involved using different types of bags to cover the fruits, including (untreated control, double gauze cloth, Saran, and white paper bags). The second factor included calcium spraying at concentrations of 0, 1, and 2 gL −1 . The findings showed that fruit bagging treatments significantly impacted every study subject characteristics except for the number of fruits and peel thickness, Saran bagging helped achieve the greatest outcomes for traits (fruit volume (cm3), percentage of fruit peel, percentage of peel moisture, and yield) at (214.40 cm 3 , 40.00%, 60.23%, and 23.27 kg tree −1 ) respectively. Furthermore, the above treatment resulted in the lowest percentage of cracked fruits at 13.43%. Conversely, the treatment of bagging with white paper bags attained the greatest value for the fruit firmness characteristic at 2.43 kg cm −2 . As for the calcium spray, It had a noteworthy impact on every subject examined. characteristics. The high concentration (2 g liter −1 ) achieved the best values for fruit volume, number of fruits, peel thickness, percentage of fruit peel, percentage of peel moisture, and yield, at 211.08 cm 3 , 58.21 fruits tree −1 , 4.36 mm, 40.91%, 61.25%, and 24.03 kg tree −1 ) respectively. Additionally, the above treatment resulted in the lowest percentage of cracked fruits at 15.24%.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit bagging significantly impacted all fruit characteristics except fruit number and peel thickness.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatume0
Treatment
fruit bagging treatmentse1
Outcome
every study subject characteristicse1
Direction
significantly impactede1
Qualifier
except for the number of fruits and peel thicknesse1
Comparator
untreated controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on the pomegranate trees of the seedless Rawa cv.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–160 · show in text ↑
e1

“fruit bagging treatments significantly impacted every study subject characteristics except for the number of fruits and peel thickness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 602–736 · show in text ↑
e2

“untreated control, double gauze cloth, Saran, and white paper bags”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 423–489 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Saran bagging gave the greatest fruit volume (214.40 cm3).

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatume0
Treatment
Saran bagginge3
Outcome
fruit volume (cm3)e3
Direction
greateste3
Value
214.40 cm 3e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on the pomegranate trees of the seedless Rawa cv.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–160 · show in text ↑
e3

“Saran bagging helped achieve the greatest outcomes for traits (fruit volume (cm3), percentage of fruit peel, percentage of peel moisture, and yield) at (214.40 cm 3 , 40.00%, 60.23%, and 23.27 kg tree −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 738–941 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Saran bagging gave the greatest fruit peel percentage (40.00%).

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatume0
Treatment
Saran bagginge3
Outcome
percentage of fruit peele3
Direction
greateste3
Value
40.00%e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on the pomegranate trees of the seedless Rawa cv.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–160 · show in text ↑
e3

“Saran bagging helped achieve the greatest outcomes for traits (fruit volume (cm3), percentage of fruit peel, percentage of peel moisture, and yield) at (214.40 cm 3 , 40.00%, 60.23%, and 23.27 kg tree −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 738–941 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Saran bagging gave the greatest peel moisture percentage (60.23%).

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatume0
Treatment
Saran bagginge3
Outcome
percentage of peel moisturee3
Direction
greateste3
Value
60.23%e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on the pomegranate trees of the seedless Rawa cv.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–160 · show in text ↑
e3

“Saran bagging helped achieve the greatest outcomes for traits (fruit volume (cm3), percentage of fruit peel, percentage of peel moisture, and yield) at (214.40 cm 3 , 40.00%, 60.23%, and 23.27 kg tree −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 738–941 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Saran bagging gave the greatest yield (23.27 kg tree-1).

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatume0
Treatment
Saran bagginge3
Outcome
yielde3
Direction
greateste3
Value
23.27 kg tree −1e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on the pomegranate trees of the seedless Rawa cv.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–160 · show in text ↑
e3

“Saran bagging helped achieve the greatest outcomes for traits (fruit volume (cm3), percentage of fruit peel, percentage of peel moisture, and yield) at (214.40 cm 3 , 40.00%, 60.23%, and 23.27 kg tree −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 738–941 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Saran bagging gave the lowest percentage of cracked fruits (13.43%).

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatume0
Treatment
Saran bagginge3
Outcome
percentage of cracked fruitse4
Direction
loweste4
Value
13.43%e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on the pomegranate trees of the seedless Rawa cv.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–160 · show in text ↑
e3

“Saran bagging helped achieve the greatest outcomes for traits (fruit volume (cm3), percentage of fruit peel, percentage of peel moisture, and yield) at (214.40 cm 3 , 40.00%, 60.23%, and 23.27 kg tree −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 738–941 · show in text ↑
e4

“the lowest percentage of cracked fruits at 13.43%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1052 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

White paper bags gave the greatest fruit firmness (2.43 kg cm-2).

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatume0
Treatment
bagging with white paper bagse5
Outcome
fruit firmnesse5
Direction
greateste5
Value
2.43 kg cm −2e5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on the pomegranate trees of the seedless Rawa cv.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–160 · show in text ↑
e5

“the treatment of bagging with white paper bags attained the greatest value for the fruit firmness characteristic at 2.43 kg cm −2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1195 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium spraying had a noteworthy impact on every fruit characteristic examined.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatume0
Treatment
calcium spraye6
Outcome
every subject examinede6
Direction
noteworthy impacte6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on the pomegranate trees of the seedless Rawa cv.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–160 · show in text ↑
e6

“As for the calcium spray, It had a noteworthy impact on every subject examined”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1198–1276 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High calcium concentration (2 g/L) gave the best fruit volume (211.08 cm3).

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatume0
Treatment
high concentratione7
Outcome
fruit volumee7
Direction
beste7
Value
211.08 cm 3e7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on the pomegranate trees of the seedless Rawa cv.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–160 · show in text ↑
e7

“The high concentration (2 g liter −1 ) achieved the best values for fruit volume, number of fruits, peel thickness, percentage of fruit peel, percentage of peel moisture, and yield, at 211.08 cm 3 , 58.21 fruits tree −1 , 4.36 mm, 40.91%, 61.25%, and 24.03 kg tree −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1295–1562 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High calcium concentration (2 g/L) gave the best number of fruits per tree (58.21).

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatume0
Treatment
high concentratione7
Outcome
number of fruitse7
Direction
beste7
Value
58.21 fruits tree −1e7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on the pomegranate trees of the seedless Rawa cv.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–160 · show in text ↑
e7

“The high concentration (2 g liter −1 ) achieved the best values for fruit volume, number of fruits, peel thickness, percentage of fruit peel, percentage of peel moisture, and yield, at 211.08 cm 3 , 58.21 fruits tree −1 , 4.36 mm, 40.91%, 61.25%, and 24.03 kg tree −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1295–1562 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High calcium concentration (2 g/L) gave the best peel thickness (4.36 mm).

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatume0
Treatment
high concentratione7
Outcome
peel thicknesse7
Direction
beste7
Value
4.36 mme7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on the pomegranate trees of the seedless Rawa cv.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–160 · show in text ↑
e7

“The high concentration (2 g liter −1 ) achieved the best values for fruit volume, number of fruits, peel thickness, percentage of fruit peel, percentage of peel moisture, and yield, at 211.08 cm 3 , 58.21 fruits tree −1 , 4.36 mm, 40.91%, 61.25%, and 24.03 kg tree −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1295–1562 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High calcium concentration (2 g/L) gave the best fruit peel percentage (40.91%).

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatume0
Treatment
high concentratione7
Outcome
percentage of fruit peele7
Direction
beste7
Value
40.91%e7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on the pomegranate trees of the seedless Rawa cv.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–160 · show in text ↑
e7

“The high concentration (2 g liter −1 ) achieved the best values for fruit volume, number of fruits, peel thickness, percentage of fruit peel, percentage of peel moisture, and yield, at 211.08 cm 3 , 58.21 fruits tree −1 , 4.36 mm, 40.91%, 61.25%, and 24.03 kg tree −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1295–1562 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High calcium concentration (2 g/L) gave the best peel moisture percentage (61.25%).

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatume0
Treatment
high concentratione7
Outcome
percentage of peel moisturee7
Direction
beste7
Value
61.25%e7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on the pomegranate trees of the seedless Rawa cv.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–160 · show in text ↑
e7

“The high concentration (2 g liter −1 ) achieved the best values for fruit volume, number of fruits, peel thickness, percentage of fruit peel, percentage of peel moisture, and yield, at 211.08 cm 3 , 58.21 fruits tree −1 , 4.36 mm, 40.91%, 61.25%, and 24.03 kg tree −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1295–1562 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High calcium concentration (2 g/L) gave the best yield (24.03 kg tree-1).

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatume0
Treatment
high concentratione7
Outcome
yielde7
Direction
beste7
Value
24.03 kg tree −1e7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on the pomegranate trees of the seedless Rawa cv.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–160 · show in text ↑
e7

“The high concentration (2 g liter −1 ) achieved the best values for fruit volume, number of fruits, peel thickness, percentage of fruit peel, percentage of peel moisture, and yield, at 211.08 cm 3 , 58.21 fruits tree −1 , 4.36 mm, 40.91%, 61.25%, and 24.03 kg tree −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1295–1562 · show in text ↑

Vinylidene chloride-vinyl chloride copolymer · yield · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

trap barrier · yield · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

trap barrier · quality: postharvest · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.