Paper · 2025 · BMC Plant Biology

Influence of biochar feedstock blends on soil enzyme activity, nutrient cycling, lettuce biomass accumulation and photosynthesis

Jiri Holatko; Jiri Kucerik; Adnan Mustafa; et al.

17
claims
40
verbatim quotes
18
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

The thermal conversion of municipal sewage sludge (MSS) offers significant potential for sustainable waste management, particularly through the production of biochar. This study investigates the properties and soil application effects of three biochar types produced via pyrolysis: (i) pure sewage sludge (100%), (ii) sewage sludge blended with sawdust (50%+50%), and (iii) sewage sludge combined with sawdust and zeolite (50%+45%+5%). These biochars were applied at rates of 2.5% and 7.5% (w/w) to arable soil and assessed in an 8-week greenhouse experiment using lettuce (Lactuca sativa L. var. Brilant) as a model crop. The sewage sludge biochar was characterized by high nitrogen, phosphorus, and water-extractable calcium but exhibited low organic matter and organic carbon content. It enhanced soil enzyme activities related to carbon and nitrogen mineralization without affecting microbial respiration. However, at 7.5% application rate, this biochar caused the highest chlorophyll b content in lettuce, despite acidifying the soil. Adding sawdust to the pyrolysis feedstock significantly increased organic matter, organic carbon (with reduced recalcitrance), and the C: N ratio of biochar. This biochar formulation promoted microbial activity (as indicated by changes in soil respiration) and nutrient cycling, particularly through increased glucosidase activity. Conversely, addition of zeolite to the pyrolysis feedstock reduced the organic matter and organic carbon content while increasing biochar recalcitrance and nutrient immobilization, particularly of sulfur, ammonium, phosphorus, and calcium. At the 7.5% dose, the sawdust + zeolite-enriched biochar improved soil pH and potentially enhanced nutrient retention. However, it did not stimulate microbial enzyme activity or respiration, leading to lower photosynthetic pigment levels and reduced biomassin lettuce, especially at higher application rate. For short-term soil applications under the conditions of this pot trial, the sewage sludge-sawdust biochar demonstrated the most beneficial effects, rapidly stimulating microbial activity and nutrient transformation. In contrast, the sewage sludge-sawdust-zeolite biochar limited nutrient availability and plant growth, suggesting it may be less suitable for immediate soil and plant nutrition. Long-term studies are needed to fully assess the implications of these biochar types for sustainable agriculture. This study highlights the importance of feedstock composition and selection in tailoring biochar properties to meet specific soil and crop requirements.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pure sewage-sludge biochar had high nitrogen, phosphorus, and water-extractable calcium.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae1
Treatment
sewage sludge biochare0
Outcome
high nitrogen, phosphorus, and water-extractable calciume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The sewage sludge biochar was characterized by high nitrogen, phosphorus, and water-extractable calcium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 623–726 · show in text ↑
e1

“lettuce (Lactuca sativa L. var. Brilant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–605 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pure sewage-sludge biochar had low organic matter and organic carbon.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae1
Treatment
sewage sludge biochare0
Outcome
low organic matter and organic carbon contente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sewage sludge biochar was characterized by high nitrogen, phosphorus, and water-extractable calcium but exhibited low organic matter and organic carbon content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 627–786 · show in text ↑
e1

“lettuce (Lactuca sativa L. var. Brilant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–605 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pure sewage-sludge biochar enhanced carbon- and nitrogen-mineralization enzyme activities.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae2
Treatment
sewage sludge biochare1
Outcome
soil enzyme activities related to carbon and nitrogen mineralizatione0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It enhanced soil enzyme activities related to carbon and nitrogen mineralization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 788–868 · show in text ↑
e1

“The sewage sludge biochar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 623–648 · show in text ↑
e2

“lettuce (Lactuca sativa L. var. Brilant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–605 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pure sewage-sludge biochar did not affect microbial respiration.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae2
Treatment
sewage sludge biochare1
Outcome
microbial respiratione0
Direction
without affectinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“without affecting microbial respiration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–908 · show in text ↑
e1

“The sewage sludge biochar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 623–648 · show in text ↑
e2

“lettuce (Lactuca sativa L. var. Brilant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–605 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 7.5% application, pure sludge biochar produced the highest lettuce chlorophyll b content.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae2
Treatment
sewage sludge biochare1
Outcome
chlorophyll b contente0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
7.5% application ratee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at 7.5% application rate, this biochar caused the highest chlorophyll b content in lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 919–1009 · show in text ↑
e1

“The sewage sludge biochar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 623–648 · show in text ↑
e2

“lettuce (Lactuca sativa L. var. Brilant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–605 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pure sludge biochar acidified soil.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae2
Treatment
sewage sludge biochare1
Outcome
soile0
Direction
acidifyinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“despite acidifying the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1011–1038 · show in text ↑
e1

“The sewage sludge biochar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 623–648 · show in text ↑
e2

“lettuce (Lactuca sativa L. var. Brilant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–605 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding sawdust increased biochar organic matter, organic carbon, and C:N ratio.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae1
Treatment
Adding sawdust to the pyrolysis feedstocke0
Outcome
organic matter, organic carbon (with reduced recalcitrance), and the C: N ratio of biochare0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Adding sawdust to the pyrolysis feedstock significantly increased organic matter, organic carbon (with reduced recalcitrance), and the C: N ratio of biochar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1196 · show in text ↑
e1

“lettuce (Lactuca sativa L. var. Brilant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–605 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sawdust-blended biochar promoted microbial activity and nutrient cycling, including increased glucosidase activity.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae2
Treatment
Adding sawdust to the pyrolysis feedstocke1
Outcome
microbial activity (as indicated by changes in soil respiration) and nutrient cyclinge0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This biochar formulation promoted microbial activity (as indicated by changes in soil respiration) and nutrient cycling, particularly through increased glucosidase activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1198–1370 · show in text ↑
e1

“Adding sawdust to the pyrolysis feedstock”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1081 · show in text ↑
e2

“lettuce (Lactuca sativa L. var. Brilant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–605 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding zeolite reduced biochar organic matter and organic carbon.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae1
Treatment
addition of zeolite to the pyrolysis feedstocke0
Outcome
organic matter and organic carbon contente0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“addition of zeolite to the pyrolysis feedstock reduced the organic matter and organic carbon content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1384–1484 · show in text ↑
e1

“lettuce (Lactuca sativa L. var. Brilant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–605 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding zeolite increased biochar recalcitrance and immobilization of sulfur, ammonium, phosphorus, and calcium.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae1
Treatment
addition of zeolite to the pyrolysis feedstocke0
Outcome
biochar recalcitrance and nutrient immobilization, particularly of sulfur, ammonium, phosphorus, and calciume0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“addition of zeolite to the pyrolysis feedstock reduced the organic matter and organic carbon content while increasing biochar recalcitrance and nutrient immobilization, particularly of sulfur, ammonium, phosphorus, and calcium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1384–1610 · show in text ↑
e1

“lettuce (Lactuca sativa L. var. Brilant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–605 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 7.5%, sawdust-zeolite biochar improved soil pH.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae1
Treatment
sawdust + zeolite-enriched biochare0
Outcome
soil pHe0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
7.5% dosee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the 7.5% dose, the sawdust + zeolite-enriched biochar improved soil pH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1612–1685 · show in text ↑
e1

“lettuce (Lactuca sativa L. var. Brilant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–605 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 7.5%, sawdust-zeolite biochar potentially enhanced nutrient retention.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae1
Treatment
sawdust + zeolite-enriched biochare0
Outcome
nutrient retentione0
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
potentiallye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the 7.5% dose, the sawdust + zeolite-enriched biochar improved soil pH and potentially enhanced nutrient retention”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1612–1729 · show in text ↑
e1

“lettuce (Lactuca sativa L. var. Brilant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–605 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sawdust-zeolite biochar did not stimulate microbial enzyme activity or respiration.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae2
Treatment
sawdust + zeolite-enriched biochare1
Outcome
microbial enzyme activity or respiratione0
Direction
did not stimulatee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it did not stimulate microbial enzyme activity or respiration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1740–1801 · show in text ↑
e1

“sawdust + zeolite-enriched biochar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1634–1668 · show in text ↑
e2

“lettuce (Lactuca sativa L. var. Brilant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–605 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sawdust-zeolite biochar lowered lettuce photosynthetic pigments.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
sawdust + zeolite-enriched biochare1
Outcome
photosynthetic pigment levelse0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“leading to lower photosynthetic pigment levels and reduced biomassin lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1803–1879 · show in text ↑
e1

“sawdust + zeolite-enriched biochar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1634–1668 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sawdust-zeolite biochar reduced lettuce biomass, especially at higher application rate.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
sawdust + zeolite-enriched biochare1
Outcome
biomassin lettucee0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
especially at higher application ratee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lower photosynthetic pigment levels and reduced biomassin lettuce, especially at higher application rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1814–1918 · show in text ↑
e1

“sawdust + zeolite-enriched biochar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1634–1668 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors judge sludge-sawdust biochar most beneficial for short-term soil application.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae1
Outcome
sewage sludge-sawdust biochar demonstrated the most beneficial effectse0
Qualifier
short-term soil applications under the conditions of this pot triale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For short-term soil applications under the conditions of this pot trial, the sewage sludge-sawdust biochar demonstrated the most beneficial effects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1920–2067 · show in text ↑
e1

“lettuce (Lactuca sativa L. var. Brilant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–605 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors consider sludge-sawdust-zeolite biochar less suitable for immediate soil and plant nutrition.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae1
Outcome
less suitable for immediate soil and plant nutritione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sewage sludge-sawdust-zeolite biochar limited nutrient availability and plant growth, suggesting it may be less suitable for immediate soil and plant nutrition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2154–2313 · show in text ↑
e1

“lettuce (Lactuca sativa L. var. Brilant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–605 · show in text ↑

other · physiology: photosynthesis · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Results differ

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

biochar · physiology: photosynthesis · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

other · soil: chemistry · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

other · soil: biology · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

biochar · soil: biology · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

growing medium · nutrient: content · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 13 positive, 3 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

biochar · nutrient: content · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 18 positive, 2 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

other · nutrient: content · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 32 positive, 4 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

8 of 15 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.