Paper · 2025 · International Journal of Molecular Sciences

Post-Harvest Quality Changes and Molecular Responses of Epidermal Wax in ‘Munage’ Grapes with Botrytis cinerea Infection

Yu Wang; Yunhao Lv; Tong Han; et al.

12
claims
19
verbatim quotes
4
citations
5
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the impact of Botrytis cinerea (B. cinerea) on the post-harvest quality of ‘Munage’ grapes and their molecular mechanism. The results showed that B. cinerea significantly reduced the post-harvest quality of ‘Munage’ grapes, which was manifested by an increase in incidence and rot rate, a significant increase in weight loss rate and fruit color difference, and a significant decrease in fruit firmness. In addition, B. cinerea infection significantly changed the reactive oxygen species and antioxidant enzyme activities of ‘Munage’ grapes, including increasing the H2O2 content and O2− generation rate as well as changing the superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione (GSH), catalase (CAT), and peroxidase (POD) activities. B. cinerea also significantly changed the wax structure and content of ‘Munage’ grapes, causing the wax to completely dissolve and disappear and reducing the relative content of wax components. Through RNA-seq analysis, it was found that after B. cinerea infection, 49 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) related to fatty acid synthesis, extension, cutin and wax synthesis, and wax transport showed up-regulation or down-regulation, and 12 different transcription factors (TFs) also showed significant differential expression. These TFs were correlated with DEGs related to wax synthesis and metabolism, indicating that they may play an important role in the epidermal wax changes in ‘Munage’ grapes caused by B. cinerea. This study revealed the impact of B. cinerea on the post-harvest quality of ‘Munage’ grapes and their molecular mechanism and provided a scientific basis for grape disease prevention and quality maintenance.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

B. cinerea reduced grape postharvest quality, increasing incidence and rot rate.

Taxon
grapese0
Material
‘Munage’e0
Treatment
B. cinereae0
Interactor
B. cinereaBotrytis cinereae0pathogen
Outcome
incidence and rot ratee0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B. cinerea significantly reduced the post-harvest quality of ‘Munage’ grapes, which was manifested by an increase in incidence and rot rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 178–317 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Infection significantly increased grape weight loss rate and fruit color difference.

Taxon
grapese1
Material
‘Munage’e1
Treatment
B. cinereae1
Interactor
B. cinereaBotrytis cinereae1pathogen
Outcome
weight loss rate and fruit color differencee0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a significant increase in weight loss rate and fruit color difference”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 319–388 · show in text ↑
e1

“B. cinerea significantly reduced the post-harvest quality of ‘Munage’ grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 178–254 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Infection significantly decreased grape fruit firmness.

Taxon
grapese1
Material
‘Munage’e1
Treatment
B. cinereae1
Interactor
B. cinereaBotrytis cinereae1pathogen
Outcome
fruit firmnesse0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a significant decrease in fruit firmness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 394–434 · show in text ↑
e1

“B. cinerea significantly reduced the post-harvest quality of ‘Munage’ grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 178–254 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Infection increased grape H2O2 content and O2− generation rate.

Taxon
grapese0
Material
‘Munage’e0
Treatment
B. cinerea infectione0
Interactor
B. cinereaBotrytis cinereae0pathogen
Outcome
H2O2 content and O2− generation ratee0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B. cinerea infection significantly changed the reactive oxygen species and antioxidant enzyme activities of ‘Munage’ grapes, including increasing the H2O2 content and O2− generation rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 449–635 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Infection changed SOD, GSH and CAT activities in grapes.

Taxon
grapese1
Treatment
B. cinerea infectione1
Interactor
B. cinereaBotrytis cinereae1pathogen
Outcome
superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione (GSH), catalase (CAT)e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“changing the superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione (GSH), catalase (CAT), and peroxidase (POD) activities.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–755 · show in text ↑
e1

“B. cinerea infection significantly changed the reactive oxygen species and antioxidant enzyme activities of ‘Munage’ grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 449–572 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Infection changed grape peroxidase activities.

Taxon
grapese1
Treatment
B. cinerea infectione1
Interactor
B. cinereaBotrytis cinereae1pathogen
Outcome
peroxidase (POD) activitiese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“changing the superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione (GSH), catalase (CAT), and peroxidase (POD) activities.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–755 · show in text ↑
e1

“B. cinerea infection significantly changed the reactive oxygen species and antioxidant enzyme activities of ‘Munage’ grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 449–572 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Infection caused grape wax to completely dissolve and disappear.

Taxon
grapese0
Treatment
B. cinereae0
Interactor
B. cinereaBotrytis cinereae0pathogen
Outcome
wax to completely dissolve and disappeare0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B. cinerea also significantly changed the wax structure and content of ‘Munage’ grapes, causing the wax to completely dissolve and disappear”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–896 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Infection reduced relative content of grape wax components.

Taxon
grapese0
Treatment
B. cinereae0
Interactor
B. cinereaBotrytis cinereae0pathogen
Outcome
relative content of wax componentse0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B. cinerea also significantly changed the wax structure and content of ‘Munage’ grapes, causing the wax to completely dissolve and disappear and reducing the relative content of wax components.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–949 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After infection, 49 genes involved in fatty acid, cutin, wax synthesis and transport were differentially expressed.

Taxon
Grapest0
Treatment
B. cinerea infectione0
Interactor
B. cinereaBotrytis cinereae0pathogen
Outcome
differentially expressed genes (DEGs)e0
Direction
up-regulation or down-regulatione0
Value
49e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“after B. cinerea infection, 49 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) related to fatty acid synthesis, extension, cutin and wax synthesis, and wax transport showed up-regulation or down-regulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 994–1189 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Munage’ Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–88 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Twelve transcription factors showed significant differential expression after infection.

Taxon
Grapest0
Treatment
B. cinerea infectione1
Interactor
B. cinereaBotrytis cinereae1pathogen
Outcome
differential expressione0
Value
12e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“12 different transcription factors (TFs) also showed significant differential expression.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1284 · show in text ↑
e1

“after B. cinerea infection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 994–1020 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Munage’ Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–88 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transcription factors correlated with wax synthesis and metabolism DEGs.

Taxon
grapese0
Gene
TFse0
Outcome
DEGs related to wax synthesis and metabolisme0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“These TFs were correlated with DEGs related to wax synthesis and metabolism, indicating that they may play an important role in the epidermal wax changes in ‘Munage’ grapes caused by B. cinerea.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1285–1479 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The transcription factors may contribute to infection-induced epidermal wax changes.

Taxon
grapese0
Interactor
B. cinereaBotrytis cinereae0pathogen
Gene
TFse0
Outcome
epidermal wax changese0
Qualifier
may play an important rolee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These TFs were correlated with DEGs related to wax synthesis and metabolism, indicating that they may play an important role in the epidermal wax changes in ‘Munage’ grapes caused by B. cinerea.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1285–1479 · show in text ↑

Botrytis cinerea · physiology: oxidative · VitisPositive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Botrytis cinerea · disease · VitisPositive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

Botrytis cinerea · molecular: metabolites · VitisPositive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

infection · physiology: oxidative · VitisPositive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.